List of Tables and Figures

List of Tables | List of Appendix Tables | List of Figures

List of Tables

• Table 1: Total public school district fiscal year (FY) 2000 and FY 2001 energy expenditures and FY 2001 and FY 2002 energy budgets as reported in FY 2002, by selected district characteristics: FY 2000 to FY 2002

• Table 2: Mean energy expenditures per pupil of public school districts in fiscal year (FY) 2000 and FY 2001, mean energy budgets per pupil of public school districts in FY 2001 and FY 2002, and percentage difference between various years, by selected district characteristics: FY 2000 to FY 2002

• Table 3: Percent of public school districts using various measures to reduce energy expenditures, by selected district characteristics: Fiscal years 2001 and 2002

• Table 4: Percent of public school districts with sufficient energy budgets and the mean energy budget surplus per pupil in fiscal year (FY) 2001, and the percent of public school districts with insufficient energy budgets and the mean energy budget shortfall per pupil in FY 2001, by selected district characteristics: FY 2001

• Table 5: Percent of public school districts with budget surpluses and budget shortfalls in fiscal year (FY) 2001, by size and selected district characteristics: FY 2001

• Table 6: Percent of public school districts with insufficient energy budgets for fiscal year (FY) 2001, by primary factors in shortfall and selected district characteristics: FY 2001

• Table 7: Percent of public school districts agreeing, neither agreeing nor disagreeing, and disagreeing with the statement "Our district has successfully reduced energy usage," by selected district characteristics: Fiscal year 2001

• Table 8: Percent of public school districts agreeing, neither agreeing nor disagreeing, and disagreeing with the statement "Our district has successfully reduced the cost per unit of energy," by selected district characteristics: Fiscal year 2001

• Table 9: Percent of public school districts agreeing, neither agreeing nor disagreeing, and disagreeing with the statement "Our district has an immediate energy problem," by selected district characteristics: Fiscal year 2001

• Table 10: Percent of public school districts agreeing, neither agreeing nor disagreeing, and disagreeing with the statement "Our district has a long -term energy problem," by selected district characteristics: Fiscal year 2001

• Table 11: Percent of public school districts agreeing, neither agreeing nor disagreeing, and disagreeing with the statement "Future increases in energy costs pose a major threat to the allocation of district funds to essential areas such as student instruction," by selected district characteristics: Fiscal year 2001

List of Appendix Tables

• Table A-1: Unweighted and weighted response rates and standard errors, by selected district characteristics

• Table A-2: Number and percent of responding public school districts in the study sample and estimated number and percent of public school districts the sample represents, by selected district characteristics

List of Figures

• Figure 1: Seasonally adjusted Producer Price Index (PPI) commodities for finished energy goods: January 1992–January 2002

• Figure 2: Percent of public school districts with insufficient energy budgets for fiscal year (FY) 2001 reporting various levels of difficulty responding to the insufficiency: FY 2001

• Figure 3: Percent of public school districts with insufficient energy budgets for fiscal year (FY) 2001 reporting various reasons for difficulty responding to the insufficiency: FY 2001

Top