References

Address Before the Congress on the State of the Union. (1997, February 4). White House ElectronicPublications. [online]. http//:www.pub.whitehouse.gov/uri-es/I2R?urn:pdi://oma.eop.gov.us/1997/2/5/6.text1.

Annual Back to School Address to the National Press Club. (1998, September). Remarks as prepared fordelivery by the U.S. Secretary of Education Richard W. Riley. [online].http://www.ed.gov/Speeches/980915.html.

Asian-Pacific Economic Cooperation. (1997). Overview of teacher induction policy and practice:Results of the exploratory survey. (Issue brief No. 97-HR-01.1). Washington, DC: Asian-PacificEconomic Cooperation.

Ball, D.L. (1990). Reflections and deflections of policy: The case of Carol Turner. EducationalEvaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 263-275.

Ball, D.L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What we think we know and what weneed to learn. Phi Delta Kappan, (March), 500-508.

Ball, D.L., and Wilson, S.M. (1996). Integrity in teaching: Recognizing the fusion of the moral andintellectual. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 155-192.

Ballou, D., and Podgursky, M. (1997). Reforming teacher training and recruitment. Government UnionReview, 17(4), 1-47.

Ballou, D., and Podgursky, M. (1998). The case against teacher certification. Public Interest, 132, 17-29.

Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy. (1986). Task Force on Teaching as a profession. Anation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century. New York: Carnegie Corporation.Cohen, D.K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluationand Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327-345.

Council of Chief State School Officers. (1998). Key state education policies on K-12 education.Washington, DC: CCSSO.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a nationalcommission report. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 5-15.

Darling-Hammond, L., and McLaughlin, M.V. (1996). Policies that support professional development inan era of reform. In Teacher learning: New policies and practices, edited by M.V. McLaughlin andI. Oberman. New York: Teachers College Press.

Directive on Info Sharing: Promoting Excellence and Accountability in Teaching. (1996, September 12).White House Electronic Publications. [online]. http://www.pub.whitehouse.gov/urires/I2R?urn:pdi://oma.eop.gov.us/1996/9/12/1.text.1.

Education and Training Priorities for the Fall. (1998, August 31). [online]. http://www.ed.gov/PressReleases/08-1998.wh-0831.html.

Ferguson, R.F. (1990). Racial patterns in how school and teacher quality affect achievement andearnings. Dallas: Meadows Foundation.

Finn, J., and Achilles, C.M. (1990). Answers and questions about class size: a statewide experiment.American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 557-577.

Fullan, M., with Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York:Teacher's College Press.

Galvez-Hjornevik, C. (1986). Mentoring among teachers: A review of literature. (Report No.SP026700). Austin, TX: Journal of Teacher Education. (ERIC No. ED 262 032).

Gold, Y. (1996). Beginning teacher support: Attrition, mentoring, and induction. In Handbook ofresearch on teacher education, edited by J.P Sikula, T.J. Buttery, and E. Guyton. New York:Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers. East Lansing, MI: The Holmes Group, Inc.Ingersoll, R. (June 1998). The problem of out-of-field teaching. [online].http://www.pdkintl.org/kappan/king9806.htm.

Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (1995). INTASC Core Standards. [online].http://develop.ccsso.cybercentral.com/intascst.htm.

Jones, V. (1996). Classroom management. In Handbook of research on teacher education, edited by J.PSikula, T.J. Buttery, and E. Guyton. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

King, S.H., and Bey, T.M. The need for urban teacher mentors. Education and Urban Society, 28, (1), 3-10.

Kruse, S.M., Lewis, K., and Bryk, A. (1994). Building professional community in schools. (Issue reportNo. 6). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center on Organization andRestructuring of Schools.

Leinhardt, G. (1989). Math lessons: A contrast of novice and expert competence. Journal for Research inMathematics Education, 20(1), 52-75.

Mandel, D.R. (1996). Teacher education, training, and staff development: Implications for nationalsurveys. In Conference proceedings. From data to information: New directions for the NationalCenter for Education Statistics, edited by G. Hoachlander, J.E. Griffith, and J.H. Ralph. NCES 96-901. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

McLaughlin, M.W., and Oberman, I. (1996). (Eds). Teacher learning: New policies and practices. NewYork: Teachers College Press.

National Association of Secondary School Principals. (1996). Breaking ranks: Changing an Americaninstitution. Reston, VA: NASSP.

National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1998). What teachers should know and be able todo. [online]. http://www.nbpts.org/nbpts/standards/intro.html.

National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teaching forAmerica's future. New York: NCTAF.

National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing inquality teaching. New York: NCTAF.

Newmann. F.M. (1994). School-wide professional community. (Issue Report No. 6). Madison, WI:University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center on Organization and Restructuring of Schools.

Odden, A. (1990). Class size and student achievement: Research-based policy alternatives. EducationalEvaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(2), 213-227.

Peterson, P.L. (1990). Doing more in the same amount of time: Cathy Swift. Educational Evaluation andPolicy Analysis, 12(3), 277-296.

Ravitch, D. Lesson plan for teachers. The Washington Post, 10 August 1998, p. A17.

Sizer, T.R. (1992). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin Co.

Sprinthall, N.A., Reiman, A.J., and Theis-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. InHandbook of research on teacher education, edited by J.P Sikula, T.J. Buttery, and E. Guyton.New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Stodolsky, S.S. (1984). Teacher evaluation: The limits of looking. Educational Researcher, 13(9), 11-18.

Stodolsky, S.S. (1996). Should SASS measure instructional processes and teacher effectiveness? In TheSchools and Staffing Survey: Recommendations for the future, edited by J. Mullins and D.Kasprzyk. NCES 97-597. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Stodolsky, S.S., and Grossman, P.L. (1995). The impact of subject matter on curricular activity: Ananalysis of five academic subjects. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 227-249.

Sykes, G. (1990). Organizing policy into practice: Reactions to the cases. Educational Evaluation andPolicy Analysis, 12(3), 243-247.

Talbert, J.E., and McLaughlin, M.W. (1993). Understanding teaching in context. In Teaching forunderstanding: Challenges for policy and practice, edited by D.K. Cohen, M.W. McLaughlin, andJ.E. Talbert, pp. 1-10. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

U.S. Department of Education. (1988). Class size and public policy: Politics and panaceas,by T. Tomlinson. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. (1994a). Strong families, strong schools. Washington, DC: U.S.Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (1994b). Qualifications of thepublic school teacher workforce: 1988 and 1991. Statistical Analysis Report No. 95-665, by S.A.Bobbitt and M.M. McMillen. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996a). National assessments ofteacher quality. Working Paper No. 96-24, by Richard M. Ingersoll. Washington, DC: U.S.Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996b). Out-of-field teachingand educational equality. Statistical Analysis Report No. 96-040, by Richard M. Ingersoll.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (1996c). Are high schoolteachers teaching core subjects without college majors or minors in those subjects? Issue BriefIB-1-96, NCES 96-839, by Richard M. Ingersoll. Washington, DC: U.S. Department ofEducation.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). America's teachers:Profile of a profession, 1993-94. NCES 97-460, by R.R. Henke, S.P. Choy, X. Chen, S. Geis,M.N. Alt, and S.P. Brougham. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (1998a). The TIMSS videotapeclassroom study: Methods and findings from an exploratory research project on eighth-grademathematics instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Research and DevelopmentReport No. 98-047, by James W. Stigler, Patrick Gonzales, Takako Kawanaka, Steffen Knoll, andAna Serrano. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (1998b). School policies andpractices affecting instruction in mathematics. NCES 98-495, by E.F. Hawkins, F. Stancavage,and J.A. Dossey. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (1998c). Toward betterteaching professional development in 1993-94. Statistical Analysis Report No. 98-230, by S.Choy, X. Chen, and M. Ross. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics. (forthcoming). What happensin classrooms? Elementary and secondary school instruction, 1994-95, by R.R. Henke, X. Chen,and G. Golman. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Westerman, D.A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education,42(4), 292-305.

Wise, A.E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M.W., and Bernstein, H.T. (1984). Teacher evaluation:A study of effective practices. (Report No. R-3139-NIE). Santa Monica, CA: The RandCorporation.

Word, E., Achilles, C., Bain, H.P., Folger, J., Johnston, J., and Lintz, M.N. (1990). The state ofTennessee's student/teacher ratio (STAR) project: Technical report. Nashville, TN: Tennessee Department of Education.

Top