Actual rates | Predicted rates | 2005–07 Change measure | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
District | 2005 | 2007 | 2007 | Change | Std error | |||
Atlanta | 68.9 | 47.7 | 69.6 | -21.9 | * | 5.32 | ||
Austin | 45.8 | 47.3 | 48.7 | -1.4 | 5.75 | |||
Boston | 68.1 | 74.7 | 70.2 | 4.5 | 3.28 | |||
Charlotte | 79.4 | 80.8 | 77.1 | 3.7 | 4.06 | |||
Chicago | 64.8 | 71.7 | 68.4 | 3.3 | 5.60 | |||
Cleveland | 29.5 | 17.8 | 26.0 | -8.2 | 4.79 | |||
District of Columbia | 57.7 | 28.6 | 58.6 | -30.0 | * | 3.39 | ||
Houston | 44.6 | 52.3 | 37.9 | 14.5 | * | 5.94 | ||
Los Angeles | 73.6 | 83.2 | 76.1 | 7.1 | 6.92 | |||
New York City | 83.5 | 86.6 | 84.7 | 1.8 | 8.05 | |||
San Diego | 79.6 | 74.8 | 79.2 | -4.4 | 6.03 | |||
* 2005–07 change over time is significantly different from zero (p < .05). | ||||||||
1 In the jurisdiction-specific approach, the change measure is, by construction, the difference between the 2007 actual and 2007 predicted rates. | ||||||||
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 2005 and 2007 Reading Assessments. |
Read more about Measuring Status and Change in NAEP Inclusion Rates of Students with Disabilities: Trial Urban District Assessment 2005 to 2007.