Skip Navigation

EDUCATION INDICATORS: An International Perspective


Indicator 4: Nonuniversity Enrollment


Table 4: Percentage of young adults enrolled1 in public and private
nonuniversity higher education, by age group and country: 1992

--------------------------------------------------------
	
                               Age
                       ---------------------------------
Country			18-21	22-25	26-29
--------------------------------------------------------
G-72		
Canada3			8.1	2.7	0.8
France			8.8	2.3	0.3
West Germany (former)	2.3	1.7	1.4
United Kingdom		3.9	2.0	1.1
United States          13.8     6.5     4.1
Other		
Australia              22.9     9.2    11.4
Belgium                14.0     2.5     0.1
Czech Republic          0.8     -       -
Denmark                 0.7     2.7     1.4
Finland                 4.6     5.9     2.0
			
Greece			8.2	3.3	0.5
Hungary			4.7	1.4	0.5
New Zealand		4.2	4.2	3.0
Norway			5.7	5.1	2.5
Poland			3.5	1.2	-
			
Russia			9.5	4.6	-
Spain			0.3	-	-
Sweden			6.3	4.6	2.7
Switzerland		2.4	5.4	3.0
Turkey			1.1	0.3	0.1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

-Not available.
1/ Head counts.
2/ No data available for Italy and Japan. 31991 data.

NOTE: See supplemental note to Indicator 4 for details on indicator calculation for Australia, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Poland, and Russia and for information on the calculation of enrollment rates and full-time equivalents.

SOURCE: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Center for Educational Research and Innovation, International Indicators Project, 1995.



Figure 4: Percentage enrolled in nonuniversity higher education, by age group and G-7 country:1,2 1992


1/ No data available for Italy and Japan
2/ Countries are sorted in descending order by the percentage of 18- to 21-year-olds enrolled in nonuniversity higher education.
3/ 1991 data.

SOURCE: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Center for Educational Research and Innovation, International Indicators Project, 1995.

See Supplemental Notes on Figure and Tables


[Indicator 3] Previous Table of Contents Next[Indicator 5]