• Selected Findings
• References

Although some items, such as those on school and classroom connectivity, have appeared annually on the survey, new items have been added as technology has changed and new issues have arisen. For example, an item on types of Internet connections was added in 1996 and has remained part of the subsequent surveys, with some modifications. The fall 2002 survey included items on access to the Internet outside of regular school hours; technologies and procedures used to prevent student access to inappropriate material on the Internet; school web sites; staff responsible for computer hardware, software, Internet, and web site support; loans of laptop computers to students; and provision of hand-held computers to students and teachers.

This survey was conducted by NCES using the Fast Response Survey System (FRSS). FRSS is designed to administer short, focused, issue-oriented surveys that place minimal burden on respondents and have a quick turnaround from data collection to reporting. Questionnaires for this survey were mailed to a representative sample of 1,206 public schools in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Data have been weighted to yield national estimates.

In addition to national estimates, selected survey findings are presented by the following school characteristics:

• instructional level (elementary, secondary);
• school size (enrollment of less than 300, 300 to 999, 1,000 or more);
• locale (city, urban fringe, town, rural);
• percent minority enrollment (less than 6 percent, 6 to 20 percent, 21 to 49 percent, 50 percent or more); and
• percent of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch (less than 35 percent, 35 to 49 percent, 50 to 74 percent, 75 percent or more), which is used as a measure of poverty concentration at the school.

Key findings from the survey "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 2002" are presented below. For selected topics, data from previous FRSS Internet surveys are presented as well. The findings are organized as follows:

• school connectivity;
• students and computer access;
• school web sites;
• technologies and procedures to prevent student access to inappropriate material on the Internet; and
• teacher professional development on how to integrate the use of the Internet into the curriculum.

The survey asked whether schools had access to the Internet. Other data collected allowed for the computation of the proportion of instructional rooms with Internet access. In addition, schools were asked to indicate the type of Internet connections used, as well as the staff position of the person primarily responsible for computer hardware, software, and Internet support at the school.

• In fall 2002, 99 percent of public schools in the United States had access to the Internet. When NCES first started estimating Internet access in schools in 1994, 35 percent of public schools had access. In 2002, no differences in school Internet access were observed by any school characteristics. This is consistent with data reported previously (Kleiner and Farris 2002), which showed that there have been virtually no differences in school access to the Internet by school characteristics since 1999.

• Public schools have made consistent progress in expanding Internet access in instructional rooms,¹ from 3 percent in 1994 to 77 percent in 2000 and 92 percent in 2002 (figure 1).
• In 2002, there were differences in Internet access in instructional rooms by locale. A smaller percentage of instructional rooms were connected to the Internet in city schools (88 percent) than in schools located in towns (96 percent) and rural areas (93 percent).

Figure 1. Percent of public school instructional rooms with Internet access: 1994–2002
NOTE: Percentages are based on all schools. All of the estimates in this report were recalculated from raw data files using the same computational algorithms. Consequently, some estimates presented here may differ trivially (i.e., by 1 percent) from results published prior to 2001.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Fast Response Survey System (FRSS): "Survey on Advanced Telecommunications in U.S. Public Schools, K–12," FRSS 51, 1994; "Survey on Advanced Telecommunications in U.S. Public Schools, K-12," FRSS 57, 1995; "Advanced Telecommunications in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 1996," FRSS 61, 1996; "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 1997," FRSS 64, 1997; "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 1998," FRSS 69, 1998; "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 1999," FRSS 75, 1999; "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 2000," FRSS 79, 2000; "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 2001," FRSS 82, 2001; and "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 2002," FRSS 83, 2002.

Over the years, changes have occurred in the types of Internet connections used by public schools and the speed at which they are connected to the Internet. In 1996, dial-up Internet connections (a type of narrowband connection) were used by about three-fourths (74 percent) of public schools having Internet access (Heaviside, Riggins, and Farris 1997). In comparison, in 2001, 5 percent of schools used dial-up connections, while the majority of public schools (55 percent) reported using T1/DS1 lines (a type of broadband connection), a continuous and much faster type of Internet connection than dial-up connections (Kleiner and Farris 2002).

• In 2002, 94 percent of public schools with Internet access used broadband connections to access the Internet. This is an increase from 2001 and 2000, when 85 percent and 80 percent of the schools, respectively, were using broadband connections.² In 2002, as in previous years (Kleiner and Farris 2002), the likelihood of using broadband connections increased with school size; 90 percent of small schools reported using broadband connections to access the Internet, compared with 100 percent of large schools.
• The use of broadband connections increased between 2000 and 2002, from 81 percent to 95 percent, in schools with the highest minority enrollment. Similarly, the percentage of schools with the highest poverty concentration (as measured by the percent of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch) using broadband connections to access the Internet increased from 75 percent to 95 percent.
• Twenty-three percent of public schools with Internet access used wireless Internet connections in 2002.³ Large schools were more likely than medium-sized and small schools to use wireless Internet connections (37 percent compared with 23 percent and 17 percent, respectively).
• Of the schools using wireless Internet connections in 2002, 88 percent indicated that they used broadband wireless Internet connections. Across all school characteristics, this percentage ranged from 76 percent to 100 percent.
• In 2002, 15 percent of all public school instructional rooms had wireless Internet connections. Differences were observed only by instructional level. A higher percentage of instructional rooms had wireless Internet connections in secondary schools (19 percent) than in elementary schools (13 percent).

• The staff position of the person with primary responsibility for computer hardware, software, and Internet support varied considerably across schools in 2002. Thirty-eight percent of schools indicated that it was a full-time, paid school technology director or coordinator; 26 percent, district staff; 18 percent, a teacher or other staff as part of formal responsibilities; 11 percent, a part-time, paid school technology director or coordinator; 3 percent, a consultant or outside contractor; 3 percent, a teacher or other staff as volunteers; and 1 percent, some other position (figure 2).
• The likelihood that the person primarily responsible for computer hardware, software, and Internet support would be a full-time, paid technology director or coordinator increased with school size in 2002, from 29 percent in small schools to 48 percent in large schools. Differences were also observed by percent minority enrollment; schools with the lowest minority enrollment were more likely than other schools to report that a full-time, paid technology director or coordinator was the person primarily responsible for computer hardware, software, and Internet support (49 percent compared with 32 to 34 percent in other schools).

Figure 2. Percentage distribution of the staff position of those who were primarily responsible for computer hardware, software, and Internet support at the school: 2002
¹This category includes consultant/outside contractor, teachers or other staff as volunteers, and other.

NOTE: Percentages are based on the 99 percent of public schools with Internet access.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Fast Response Survey System (FRSS), "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 2002," FRSS 83, 2002.

More children and adolescents in the nation used computers at school than at home in 2001 (DeBell and Chapman 2003). The survey "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 2002" obtained information on various measures of student access to computers at school, such as the ratio of students to instructional computers with Internet access, student access to the Internet outside of regular school hours, the provision of hand-held computers to students and teachers, and laptop loans to students.

• The ratio of students to instructional computers with Internet access was computed by dividing the total number of students in all public schools by the total number of instructional computers with Internet access in all public schools (i.e., including schools with no Internet access).⁴ In 2002, the ratio of students to instructional computers with Internet access in public schools was 4.8 to 1, an improvement from the 12.1 to 1 ratio in 1998, when it was first measured (figure 3).
• However, as in previous years (Kleiner and Farris 2002), there were differences by school characteristics in 2002. For example, the ratio of students to instructional computers with Internet access was higher in schools with the highest poverty concentration than in schools with the lowest poverty concentration (5.5 to 1 compared with 4.6 to 1). Despite this gap, in schools with the highest poverty concentration, the ratio improved from 6.8 students per computer in 2001 to 5.5 per computer in 2002. The difference between schools with the highest and lowest poverty concentrations in the ratio of students per instructional computer with Internet access decreased from 6.2 students per computer in 1998 to 0.8 students per computer in 2002.

Figure 3. Ratio of public school students to instructional computers with Internet access: 1998–2002

• In 2001, 5- to 17-year-olds whose families were in poverty were less likely to use the Internet at their home than 5- to 17-year-olds whose families were not in poverty (47 percent compared with 82 percent) (DeBell and Chapman 2003). Making the Internet accessible outside of regular school hours allows students who do not have access to the Internet at home to use this resource for school-related activities such as homework.
• In 2002, 53 percent of public schools with Internet access reported that they made computers with access to the Internet available to students outside of regular school hours. Differences by school characteristics were observed only for instructional level and school size. Secondary schools were more likely to make the Internet available to students outside of regular school hours than were elementary schools (73 percent compared with 47 percent). Similarly, large schools reported making the Internet available to students outside of regular school hours more often than did medium-sized and small schools (79 percent compared with 50 percent and 49 percent, respectively).
• Among schools providing computers with Internet access to students outside of regular school hours in 2002, 96 percent made them available after school; 74 percent, before school; and 6 percent, on weekends. The availability of computers with Internet access before school was lower in schools with the highest minority enrollment (62 percent) than in schools with the two lowest categories of minority enrollment (80 percent and 78 percent). A similar pattern occurred by school poverty concentration for the availability of computers with Internet access before school, with 57 percent for schools with the highest poverty concentration, compared with 75 percent and 82 percent for schools with the two lowest categories of poverty concentration. There were no differences by school characteristics for the availability of computers with Internet access after school. In addition, there were virtually no differences by school characteristics for the availability of computers with Internet access on weekends.
• In 2002, schools making computers with Internet access available to students outside of regular school hours reported that students had, on average, access to 49 computers with Internet access. No increase was observed in the average number of computers with Internet access available to students outside of regular school hours between 2001 and 2002.

• In 2002, 7 percent of public schools provided hand-held computers to students or teachers for instructional purposes.⁵ No differences were observed by school characteristics.
• Among schools providing hand-held computers to students or teachers for instructional purposes in 2002, the median number of hand-held computers provided per school was 9 (i.e., half of the schools reported a lower number than 9 and the other half a higher number).⁶

In addition to asking about the availability of computers with Internet access outside of regular school hours and the provision of hand-held computers to students or teachers, the survey asked whether the schools lent laptop computers to students, how many laptops were available for loan, and the maximum length of time for which they could be borrowed. If schools did not lend laptop computers to students in 2002, a question inquired whether they planned to lend them in the 2003–04 school year.

• In 2002, 8 percent of public schools lent laptop computers to students.⁷ In those schools, the median number of laptop computers available for loan was 7. This represents 1 laptop computer for 16 students.⁸ Fifty-nine percent of schools lending laptop computers reported that students could borrow them for less than 1 week, 19 percent reported that students could borrow them for a period of 1 week to less than 1 month, and 16 percent reported lending laptops for the entire school year.
• Of the 92 percent of schools without laptop computers available for loan to students in 2002, 7 percent were planning to make laptops available for students to borrow during the 2003–04 school year. No differences were observed by school characteristics.

Since 99 percent of public schools were connected to the Internet in 2002, most schools had the capability to make information available to parents and students directly via e-mail or through a web site. The survey asked whether the schools had a web site or a web page (e.g., a web page on the district's web site), how often it was updated, and who was primarily responsible for the school's web site or web page support.⁹

• Nationwide, 86 percent of public schools with access to the Internet had a web site or web page in 2002. This is an increase from 2001, when 75 percent of public schools reported having a web site. There were differences by school characteristics in the likelihood of having a web site or web page. For example, the likelihood of having a web site or a web page was lower in schools with the highest minority enrollment than in other schools (76 percent compared with 87 to 92 percent). The likelihood of having a web site or web page also decreased as the poverty concentration increased: 94 percent of schools with the lowest poverty concentration had a web site or web page, compared to 66 percent of schools with the highest poverty concentration.
• Of the schools having a web site or a web page, 68 percent reported that their web site or web page was updated at least monthly.¹⁰ Among the 32 percent of schools updating their web site or web page less often than monthly, differences by school characteristics were observed. For example, schools with the highest minority enrollment (49 percent) were more likely than other schools (22 percent to 30 percent) to update their web site or web page less than monthly. The likelihood of updating the web site or web page less than monthly also increased with poverty concentration of the schools (from 22 percent for schools with the lowest poverty concentration to 51 percent for schools with the highest poverty concentration).
• Among schools having a web site or web page, 29 percent reported that a teacher or other staff member was primarily responsible for the school's web site or web page support as part of his or her formal responsibilities (figure 4). Schools also reported that primary responsibility was assigned to a full-time, paid school technology director or coordinator (22 percent); a teacher or other staff as volunteers (18 percent); district staff (18 percent); a part-time, paid school technology director or coordinator (5 percent); students (2 percent); or a consultant or outside contractor (2 percent). Some other person was cited by 4 percent of the schools.
• The likelihood of having a teacher or other staff primarily responsible for the school's web site as part of his or her formal responsibilities was higher in secondary schools (35 percent) than in elementary schools (28 percent). The likelihood also increased with school size (from 26 percent in small schools to 39 percent in large schools).

Figure 4. Percentage distribution of types of staff and students who were primarily responsible for the school's web site or web page support: 2002
¹This category includes part-time, paid school technology director/coordinator, students, consultant/outside contractor, and other.

NOTE: Percentages are based on 85 percent of public schools (99 percent with Internet access x 86 percent with a web site or web page). Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Fast Response Survey System (FRSS), "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 2002," FRSS 83, 2002.

Given the diversity of the information carried on the Internet, student access to inappropriate material is a major concern of many parents and teachers. Moreover, under the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), no school may receive E-rate¹¹ discounts unless it certifies that it is enforcing a policy of Internet safety that includes the use of filtering or blocking technology.¹²

• In 2002, almost all public schools with Internet access (99 percent) used various technologies or procedures to control student access to inappropriate material on the Internet. Across all school characteristics, between 98 and 100 percent of schools reported using these technologies or procedures. In addition, 99 percent of these schools used at least one of these technologies or procedures on all Internet-connected computers used by students.
• Among schools using technologies or procedures to prevent student access to inappropriate material on the Internet in 2002, 96 percent used blocking or filtering software. Ninety-one percent of schools reported that teachers or other staff members monitored student Internet access, 82 percent had a written contract that parents have to sign, 77 percent had a contract that students have to sign, 52 percent used monitoring software, 41 percent had honor codes, and 32 percent allowed access only to their intranet.¹³ As these numbers suggest, most of the schools (96 percent) used more than one procedure or technology as part of their Internet use policy (not shown in tables).
• Ninety percent of public schools using technologies or procedures to prevent student access to inappropriate material on the Internet in 2002 indicated that they disseminated the information about these technologies or procedures to students and parents via their school policies or rules distributed to students and parents. Sixty-four percent did so with a special notice to parents, 57 percent used their newsletters to disseminate this information, 32 percent posted a message on the school web site or web page, 24 percent had a notice on a bulletin board at the school, 15 percent had a pop-up message at computer or Internet log-on, and 5 percent used a method other than the ones listed above.

Although approximately one-half of public school teachers in 1999 reported that they used computers or the Internet for instruction during class time, and/or that they assigned their students work that involves research using the Internet, one-third of teachers reported feeling well or very well prepared (Smerdon et al. 2000). The survey "Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools, Fall 2002" asked about teacher professional development on how to integrate the use of the Internet into the curriculum.

• Nationwide, 87 percent of public schools with Internet access indicated that their school or school district had offered professional development to teachers in their school on how to integrate the use of the Internet into the curriculum in the 12 months prior to the fall 2002 survey.
• Forty-two percent of the schools that had professional development on how to integrate the use of the Internet into the curriculum had 1 to 25 percent of their teachers attending such professional development in the 12 months preceding the survey. Seventeen percent of the schools had 26 to 50 percent of their teachers, 11 percent of the schools had 51 to 75 percent of their teachers, and 30 percent of the schools had 76 percent or more of their teachers attending such professional development in the 12 months preceding the survey. Another 1 percent reported not having any teachers attending such professional development during this time frame.

DeBell, M., and Chapman, C. (2003). Computer and Internet Use by Children and Adolescents in 2001 (NCES 2004–014). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Heaviside, S., Riggins, T., and Farris, E. (1997). Advanced Telecommunications in U.S. Public Elementary and Secondary Schools, Fall 1996 (NCES 97–944). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Kleiner, A., and Farris, E. (2002). Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994–2001 (NCES 2002–018). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Smerdon, B., Cronen, S., Lanahan, L., Anderson, J., Iannotti, N., and Angeles, J. (2000). Teachers' Tools for the 21st Century: A Report on Teachers' Use of Technology (NCES 2000–102). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

¹Instructional rooms include classrooms, computer and other labs, library/media centers, and any other rooms used for instructional purposes.

²In 2000 and 2001, respondents were instructed to circle as many types of connections as there were in the school. The 2002 questionnaire directly asked whether the schools used broadband and narrowband connections. These percentages include schools using only broadband connections, as well as schools using both broadband and narrowband connections. They do not include schools using narrowband connections exclusively. Broadband connections include T3/DS3, fractional T3, T1/DS1, fractional T1, and cable modem connections. In 2001 and 2002, they also included DSL connections, which had not been an option on the 2000 questionnaire.

³A school could use both wireless and wired Internet connections. Wireless Internet connections can be broadband or narrowband.

⁴This is one method of calculating students per computer. Another method involves calculating the number of students in each school divided by the number of instructional computers with Internet access in each school and then taking the mean of this ratio across all schools. When "students per computer" was first calculated for this NCES series in 1998, a decision was made to use the first method; this method continues to be used for comparison purposes. A couple of factors influenced the choice of that particular method. There was (and continues to be) considerable skewness in the distribution of students per computer per school. In addition, in 1998, 11 percent of public schools had no instructional computers with Internet access.

⁵Hand-held computers are computers, or personal digital assistants, small enough to be held in one hand. Examples are Palm Pilots or Pocket PCs.

⁶On average, 22 hand-held computers per school were provided to students or teachers in schools that supplied such computers in 2002. The average number of hand-held computers would decrease to 18 if the data for 1 school in the sample were taken out of the calculation because the school reported a number of hand-held computers much higher (1,000 hand-held computers) than any of the other schools in the sample (ranging from 1 to 140). The number of hand-held computers at that school was verified with the respondent.

⁷The difference between the percent of schools lending laptop computers to students in 2002 (8 percent) and in 2001 (10 percent) is not statistically significant.

⁸The ratio of students per laptop computer would increase to 19.9 to 1 if 1 school in the sample were taken out of the calculation because the school reported a number of laptop computers much higher (2,700) than any of the other schools in the sample (ranging from 1 to 850). The number of laptop computers at that school was verified with the respondent.

⁹In 2001, the questionnaire asked about the school's "web site." In 2002, the wording was changed to "web site or web page."

¹⁰This estimate is derived from the percentage of public schools updating their web site monthly, weekly, or daily.

¹¹The Education rate (E-rate) program was established in 1996 to make telecommunications services, Internet access, and internal connections available to schools and libraries at discounted rates based upon the income level of the students in their community and whether their location is urban or rural.

¹²More information about CIPA (P.L. 106-554) can be found at the web site of the Schools and Libraries Division, Universal Service Administrative Company (http://www.sl.universalservice.org/reference/CIPA.asp). The law is effective for Funding Year 4 (July 1, 2001, to June 30, 2002) and for all future years. Schools and libraries receiving only telecommunications services are excluded from the requirements of CIPA.

¹³An intranet is a controlled computer network similar to the Internet, but accessible only to those who have permission to use it. For example, school administrators can restrict student access to only their school's intranet, which may include information from the Internet chosen by school officials, rather than allow full Internet access.