Back | Download Excel (28 KB) | Download SE Excel (20 KB) |
Table 30. Percentage of public high schools reporting that their efforts to reduce or prevent crime at school were limited in a major or minor way due to specified school-level factors, by selected school characteristics: School year 2009–10 |
---|
School characteristic | Lack of or inadequate teacher training in classroom management | Lack of or inadequate alternative placements or programs for disruptive students | Likelihood of complaints from parents | Lack of teacher support for school policies | Lack of parental support for school policies | Teachers’ fear of student retaliation | Fear of litigation | Inconsistent application of school policies by faculty or staff | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All public high schools | 49.8 | 59.4 | 32.0 | 33.3 | 49.0 | 26.0 | 31.8 | 57.5 | |||||||
Enrollment size | |||||||||||||||
Less than 300 | 41.0 | 46.0 | 36.6 | 24.1 | 42.0 | 23.3 | 25.8 | 45.9 | |||||||
300–499 | 45.0 | 64.1 | 24.1 | 20.7 | 42.8 | 20.2 | 29.8 | 51.0 | |||||||
500–999 | 51.9 | 60.4 | 31.9 | 31.8 | 54.8 | 24.4 | 30.6 | 57.0 | |||||||
1,000 or more | 54.1 | 62.8 | 32.8 | 42.3 | 50.8 | 29.9 | 35.7 | 64.9 | |||||||
Urbanicity | |||||||||||||||
City | 57.1 | 67.8 | 33.5 | 44.2 | 53.0 | 34.7 | 35.1 | 66.2 | |||||||
Suburb | 49.3 | 60.0 | 32.2 | 34.1 | 47.4 | 23.0 | 32.6 | 60.5 | |||||||
Town | 52.3 | 56.5 | 36.0 | 30.3 | 54.0 | 24.9 | 35.7 | 53.2 | |||||||
Rural | 43.5 | 54.1 | 28.5 | 26.1 | 44.5 | 22.3 | 26.6 | 50.8 | |||||||
Crime level where students live1 | |||||||||||||||
High | 64.7 | 75.6 | 37.8 | 54.5 | 62.5 | 42.9 | 31.6 | 70.2 | |||||||
Moderate | 63.4 | 70.1 | 33.9 | 44.2 | 56.5 | 40.5 | 37.6 | 69.1 | |||||||
Low | 45.3 | 54.7 | 32.8 | 27.4 | 45.8 | 19.9 | 31.8 | 52.3 | |||||||
Mixed | 41.9 | 54.3 | 23.7 | 29.8 | 44.0 | 21.0 | 25.3 | 55.7 | |||||||
Percent of combined Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and American Indian/ Alaska Native students | |||||||||||||||
Less than 5 percent | 50.8 | 57.3 | 32.1 | 27.8 | 50.2 | 19.5 | 34.1 | 51.0 | |||||||
5 to less than 20 percent | 48.5 | 59.3 | 33.1 | 26.9 | 44.7 | 25.1 | 33.2 | 56.0 | |||||||
20 to less than 50 percent | 45.0 | 54.5 | 29.2 | 32.3 | 44.7 | 20.5 | 26.7 | 57.7 | |||||||
50 percent or more | 53.8 | 64.0 | 33.1 | 41.6 | 54.6 | 33.6 | 33.4 | 61.6 | |||||||
Percent of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch |
|||||||||||||||
0–20 percent | 40.5 | 53.2 | 25.6 | 26.9 | 39.7 | 22.7 | 35.6 | 51.1 | |||||||
21–50 percent | 53.5 | 61.8 | 32.6 | 35.1 | 50.0 | 25.5 | 30.2 | 61.0 | |||||||
More than 50 percent | 50.6 | 59.9 | 34.6 | 34.8 | 52.7 | 28.1 | 31.6 | 57.0 | |||||||
Percent of students below 15th percentile on standardized tests |
|||||||||||||||
0–5 percent | 39.8 | 50.4 | 30.0 | 26.4 | 42.3 | 19.1 | 28.8 | 49.5 | |||||||
6–15 percent | 53.7 | 61.7 | 30.8 | 32.3 | 46.7 | 27.2 | 35.8 | 58.7 | |||||||
More than 15 percent | 57.4 | 67.9 | 36.4 | 44.1 | 61.3 | 33.2 | 29.8 | 66.4 | |||||||
Percent of students likely to attend college |
|||||||||||||||
0–35 percent | 57.8 | 65.0 | 40.3 | 36.5 | 53.4 | 35.8 | 37.9 | 55.7 | |||||||
36–60 percent | 55.8 | 62.1 | 31.3 | 36.8 | 54.6 | 29.6 | 33.6 | 65.0 | |||||||
More than 60 percent | 44.6 | 56.4 | 29.6 | 30.8 | 45.0 | 21.2 | 29.0 | 54.7 | |||||||
Percent of students who consider academic achievement important |
|||||||||||||||
0–25 percent | 53.7 | 66.1 | 41.2 | 41.5 | 59.3 | 31.1 | 38.7 | 64.6 | |||||||
26–50 percent | 54.2 | 58.8 | 34.4 | 33.2 | 52.8 | 29.4 | 28.6 | 61.0 | |||||||
51–75 percent | 54.7 | 67.4 | 32.7 | 34.9 | 51.7 | 27.9 | 33.8 | 62.2 | |||||||
More than 75 percent | 44.4 | 53.5 | 29.1 | 31.1 | 44.1 | 22.5 | 30.8 | 52.0 | |||||||
Percent male enrollment | |||||||||||||||
0–44 percent | 36.1 | 54.3 | 37.6 | 26.3 | 44.9 | 24.0 | 31.3 | 46.3 | |||||||
45–55 percent | 52.1 | 60.5 | 31.5 | 34.1 | 49.3 | 26.0 | 32.0 | 58.6 | |||||||
More than 55 percent | 47.3 | 55.5 | 28.6 | 35.6 | 51.9 | 28.2 | 30.9 | 63.1 | |||||||
Student-to-FTE ratio2 | |||||||||||||||
Less than 12 students | 48.4 | 51.5 | 28.3 | 27.4 | 47.7 | 29.6 | 22.5 | 50.9 | |||||||
12–16 students | 50.1 | 58.8 | 34.0 | 35.2 | 51.8 | 23.9 | 31.8 | 58.9 | |||||||
More than 16 students | 50.0 | 62.0 | 31.6 | 33.6 | 47.3 | 26.4 | 34.4 | 58.4 | |||||||
Number of classroom changes3 | |||||||||||||||
0–3 changes | 33.3 | 57.0 | 41.3 | 22.0 | ! | 39.1 | 21.1 | ! | 37.1 | 44.6 | |||||
4–6 changes | 50.4 | 61.1 | 29.1 | 35.8 | 46.4 | 25.4 | 30.9 | 59.1 | |||||||
More than 6 changes | 51.4 | 57.9 | 33.7 | 32.2 | 52.9 | 27.2 | 32.0 | 57.6 | |||||||
Regular use of law enforcement4 | |||||||||||||||
Regular use | 52.9 | 61.1 | 32.8 | 37.4 | 50.9 | 29.1 | 34.8 | 58.0 | |||||||
No regular use | 39.9 | 53.9 | 29.2 | 20.0 | 42.6 | 15.8 | 22.1 | 56.1 | |||||||
Number of serious discipline problems5 | |||||||||||||||
No problems | 42.4 | 53.9 | 28.3 | 25.2 | 42.3 | 20.2 | 28.7 | 50.1 | |||||||
1 problem | 59.2 | 63.2 | 33.5 | 44.0 | 55.4 | 30.3 | 30.5 | 67.4 | |||||||
2 problems | 74.5 | 80.9 | 45.1 | 54.3 | 73.0 | 40.5 | 41.9 | 77.6 | |||||||
3 or more problems | 73.2 | 79.6 | 49.5 | 62.9 | 72.7 | 53.9 | 52.8 | 83.1 | |||||||
Transfers as a percentage of enrollment6 | |||||||||||||||
Less than 6 percent | 45.2 | 55.0 | 36.0 | 28.7 | 42.9 | 16.2 | 30.6 | 46.6 | |||||||
6 to less than 11 percent | 45.9 | 54.4 | 28.1 | 25.3 | 43.4 | 26.4 | 29.9 | 52.9 | |||||||
11 to less than 21 percent | 54.2 | 63.9 | 31.3 | 36.4 | 52.8 | 30.0 | 32.6 | 65.0 | |||||||
21 percent or more | 52.5 | 62.8 | 33.1 | 42.4 | 55.9 | 29.8 | 34.0 | 63.1 | |||||||
Prevalence of schoolwide disruptions7 |
|||||||||||||||
No disruptions | 50.0 | 59.1 | 32.1 | 32.6 | 48.0 | 25.5 | 30.8 | 57.1 | |||||||
Any disruptions | 48.4 | 62.3 | 30.4 | 42.0 | 60.7 | 30.8 | 43.3 | 62.3 | |||||||
Percent of students absent on a daily basis |
|||||||||||||||
0–2 percent | 34.3 | 42.8 | 23.1 | ! | 18.8 | 30.9 | 15.5 | ! | 16.2 | 37.7 | |||||
3–5 percent | 42.3 | 54.7 | 32.6 | 28.7 | 43.0 | 21.0 | 31.9 | 50.7 | |||||||
6–10 percent | 56.0 | 62.1 | 31.6 | 35.4 | 52.0 | 28.7 | 32.3 | 61.8 | |||||||
More than 10 percent | 55.5 | 69.5 | 35.0 | 44.7 | 62.3 | 34.2 | 35.9 | 69.2 | |||||||
Prevalence of violent incidents8 | |||||||||||||||
No violent incidents | 22.3 | 35.4 | 17.5 | ! | 12.5 | ! | 33.3 | 16.6 | ! | 26.5 | 29.5 | ||||
Any violent incidents | 52.6 | 61.8 | 33.4 | 35.4 | 50.6 | 26.9 | 32.3 | 60.3 | |||||||
!Interpret data with caution. The standard error for this estimate is from 30 percent to 50 percent of the estimate's value. | |||||||||||||||
1Respondents were asked, "How would you describe the crime level in the area(s) in which your students live?" Response options included "high level of crime," "moderate level of crime," "low level of crime," and "students come from areas with very different levels of crime." | |||||||||||||||
2Student-to-FTE ratio was calculated by dividing the total number of students enrolled in the school by the total number of full-time-equivalent teachers and aides. The total number of full-time-equivalent teachers and aides is a combination of the full-time and part-time teachers and aides, including special education teachers and aides, with an adjustment to compensate for the part-time status. | |||||||||||||||
3Respondents were asked, "How many classroom changes do most students make in a typical day?" Responses exclude morning arrival and afternoon departure. | |||||||||||||||
4Respondents were asked, "During the 2009–10 school year, did you have any security guards, security personnel, or sworn law enforcement officers present at your school at least once a week?" | |||||||||||||||
5Serious discipline problems include student racial/ethnic tensions, student bullying, student sexual harassment of other students, student verbal abuse of teachers, widespread disorder in classrooms, student acts of disrespect for teachers other than verbal abuse, gang activities, and cult or extremist group activities. If a respondent reported that any of these problems occurred daily or weekly in their school, each was counted once in the total number of serious discipline problems. | |||||||||||||||
6Transfers as a percentage of enrollment combines the number of students who were transferred to a school and the number of students who were transferred from a school divided by the total number of students enrolled in the school. | |||||||||||||||
7Schoolwide disruptions include actions that disrupted school activities such as death threats, bomb threats, and chemical, biological, or radiological threats. Respondents were instructed to exclude all fire alarms, including false alarms. | |||||||||||||||
8Violent incidents include rape or attempted rape, sexual battery other than rape, physical attack or fight with or without a weapon, threat of physical attack with or without a weapon, and robbery with or without a weapon. | |||||||||||||||
NOTE: Respondents were asked to rate the level of limitation in their school's efforts to reduce or prevent crime for each factor. Survey response options included "limits in major way," "limits in minor way," or "does not limit." The estimates in this table represent only those schools that reported limitations in a major or minor way. Responses were provided by the principal or the person most knowledgeable about crime and safety issues at the school. Race categories exclude persons of Hispanic ethnicity. | |||||||||||||||
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), 2009–10 School Survey on Crime and Safety (SSOCS). |
Back | Download Excel (28 KB) | Download SE Excel (20 KB) |