● Change in average score is significantly different than the change in the U.S. average score at the .05 level of significance. — Not available. † Not applicable. # Rounds to zero. * p<.05. Change in average score is significant at the .05 level of statistical significance. 1The OECD trend scores are based on the averages of the 29 OECD countries with comparable data for 2003 and 2015 and with each country weighted equally. The five current OECD members not included in the OECD averages used to report on trends in mathematics literacy include Chile, Estonia, Israel, and Slovenia, which did not participate in 2003; and the United Kingdom, which did not meet PISA response-rate standards for the 2003 assessment. The OECD excluded the data for Austria from the trend analysis in its report (OECD, PISA 2009 Results: Learning Trends - Changes in Student Performance Since 2000 (Volume V), available at http://www.pisa.oecd.org because of a concern over a data collection issue in 2009; however, after consultation with Austrian officials, NCES kept the Austrian data in the U.S. trend reporting. 2 Because of low response rates, 2003 data for the United Kingdom are not presented. 3 The Republics of Montenegro and Serbia were a united country under the PISA 2003 assessment. 4 For Costa Rica the change between PISA 2009 and PISA 2015 represents change between 2010 and 2015 because it implemented the PISA 2009 assessment one year later, in 2010. NOTE: Education systems are ordered by 2015 average score. The PISA mathematics framework was revised in 2003. Because of changes in the framework, it is not possible to compare mathematics learning outcomes from PISA 2000 with those from PISA 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2015. Scores are reported on a scale from 0 to 1,000. Standard error is noted by s.e. Italics indicate non-OECD countries and education systems. B-S-J-G (China) refers to the four PISA participating China provinces: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Guangdong. Although Argentina, Malaysia, and Kazakhstan participated in PISA 2015, technical problems with their samples prevent results from being discussed in this report. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2003, 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2015. |