● Change in average score is significantly different than the change in the U.S. average score at the .05 level of significance. — Not available. † Not applicable. # Rounds to zero. * p<.05. Change in average score is significant at the .05 level of statistical significance. 1 For Costa Rica, the change between PISA 2009 and PISA 2012 represents change between 2010 and 2012 because it implemented the PISA 2009 assessment one year later, in 2010. NOTE: Education systems are ordered by 2015 average score. The PISA science framework was revised in 2006. Because of changes in the framework, it is not possible to compare science learning outcomes from PISA 2000 and 2003 with those from PISA 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2015. Scores are reported on a scale from 0 to 1,000. Standard error is noted by s.e. Italics indicate non-OECD countries and education systems. B-S-J-G (China) refers to the four PISA participating China provinces: Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu, and Guangdong. Although Argentina, Malaysia, and Kazakhstan participated in PISA 2015, technical problems with their samples prevent results from being discussed in this report. SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2006, 2009, 2012, and 2015. |