Figure R1a. Percentage of 15-year-old students performing at PISA reading literacy proficiency levels 5 and above and below level 2, by education system: 2012
! Interpret data with caution. Estimate is unstable due to high coefficient of variation.
� Reporting standards not met.
* p<.05. Significantly different from the U.S. percentage at the .05 level of statistical significance.
NOTE: Education systems are ordered by 2012 percentages of 15-year-olds in levels 5 and above. To reach a particular proficiency level, a student must correctly answer a majority of items at that level. Students were classified into reading proficiency levels according to their scores. Exact cut scores are as follows: below level 1b (a score less than or equal to 262.04); level 1b (a score greater than 262.04 and less than or equal to 334.75); level 1a (a score greater than 334.75 and less than or equal to 407.47); level 2 (a score greater than 407.47 and less than or equal to 480.18); level 3 (a score greater than 480.18 and less than or equal to 552.89); level 4 (a score greater than 552.89 and less than or equal to 625.61); level 5 (a score greater than 625.61 and less than or equal to 698.32); and level 6 (a score greater than 698.32). Scores are reported on a scale from 0 to 1,000. The OECD average is the average of the national percentages of the OECD member countries, with each country weighted equally. Italics indicate non-OECD countries and education systems. Results for Connecticut, Florida, and Massachusetts are for public school students only. This figure corresponds to figure 3 in Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Mathematics, Science, and Reading Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2014-024).
SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2012.
Table R1b. Percentage of 15-year-old students performing at PISA reading literacy proficiency levels 5 and above and below level 2, by education system: 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Education system | Below level 2 | Levels 5 and above | Education system | Below level 2 | Levels 5 and above | |||||||||||
Percent | s.e. | Percent | s.e. | Percent | s.e. | Percent | s.e. | |||||||||
OECD average | 18.0 | 0.18 | 8.4 | 0.12 | ||||||||||||
Shanghai-China | 2.9 | * | 0.39 | 25.1 | * | 1.19 | Russian Federation | 22.3 | * | 1.29 | 4.6 | * | 0.58 | |||
Singapore | 9.9 | * | 0.42 | 21.2 | * | 0.60 | Vietnam | 9.4 | * | 1.43 | 4.5 | * | 0.81 | |||
Japan | 9.8 | * | 0.92 | 18.5 | * | 1.27 | Croatia | 18.7 | 1.29 | 4.4 | * | 0.69 | ||||
Hong Kong-China | 6.8 | * | 0.72 | 16.8 | * | 1.16 | Slovak Republic | 28.2 | * | 1.78 | 4.4 | * | 0.68 | |||
Korea, Republic of | 7.6 | * | 0.89 | 14.1 | * | 1.24 | Turkey | 21.6 | * | 1.43 | 4.3 | * | 0.85 | |||
New Zealand | 16.3 | 0.83 | 14.0 | * | 0.77 | Bulgaria | 39.4 | * | 2.21 | 4.3 | * | 0.64 | ||||
Finland | 11.3 | * | 0.71 | 13.5 | * | 0.64 | Latvia | 17.0 | 1.14 | 4.2 | * | 0.55 | ||||
France | 18.9 | 0.98 | 12.9 | * | 0.85 | Cyprus | 32.8 | * | 0.67 | 4.0 | * | 0.32 | ||||
Canada | 10.9 | * | 0.45 | 12.9 | * | 0.62 | Lithuania | 21.2 | * | 1.18 | 3.3 | * | 0.37 | |||
Chinese Taipei | 11.5 | * | 0.87 | 11.8 | * | 0.84 | Serbia, Republic of | 33.1 | * | 1.66 | 2.2 | * | 0.41 | |||
Belgium | 16.1 | 0.81 | 11.8 | * | 0.60 | United Arab Emirates | 35.5 | * | 1.08 | 2.2 | * | 0.29 | ||||
Australia | 14.2 | 0.46 | 11.7 | * | 0.54 | Qatar | 57.1 | * | 0.42 | 1.6 | * | 0.14 | ||||
Ireland | 9.6 | * | 0.88 | 11.4 | * | 0.65 | Romania | 37.3 | * | 1.87 | 1.6 | * | 0.38 | |||
Liechtenstein | 12.4 | 1.88 | 10.9 | 2.89 | Albania | 52.3 | * | 1.28 | 1.2 | * | 0.25 | |||||
Norway | 16.2 | 1.03 | 10.2 | * | 0.74 | Montenegro, Republic of | 43.3 | * | 0.75 | 1.0 | * | 0.19 | ||||
Poland | 10.6 | * | 0.80 | 10.0 | 0.93 | Uruguay | 47.0 | * | 1.42 | 0.9 | * | 0.27 | ||||
Netherlands | 14.0 | 1.23 | 9.8 | 0.82 | Thailand | 33.0 | * | 1.40 | 0.8 | * | 0.22 | |||||
Israel | 23.6 | * | 1.64 | 9.6 | 0.84 | Chile | 33.0 | * | 1.67 | 0.6 | * | 0.10 | ||||
Switzerland | 13.7 | * | 0.76 | 9.1 | 0.68 | Costa Rica | 32.4 | * | 1.81 | 0.6 | !* | 0.19 | ||||
Germany | 14.5 | 0.91 | 8.9 | 0.70 | Argentina | 53.6 | * | 1.73 | 0.5 | * | 0.14 | |||||
Luxembourg | 22.2 | * | 0.74 | 8.9 | 0.39 | Brazil | 49.2 | * | 1.13 | 0.5 | * | 0.12 | ||||
United Kingdom | 16.6 | 1.30 | 8.8 | 0.74 | Peru | 59.9 | * | 1.95 | 0.5 | !* | 0.21 | |||||
Estonia | 9.1 | * | 0.65 | 8.3 | 0.72 | Mexico | 41.1 | * | 0.90 | 0.4 | * | 0.09 | ||||
United States | 16.6 | 1.26 | 7.9 | 0.67 | Colombia | 51.4 | * | 1.78 | 0.3 | !* | 0.13 | |||||
Sweden | 22.7 | * | 1.15 | 7.9 | 0.64 | Tunisia | 49.3 | * | 2.24 | ‡ | † | |||||
Macao-China | 11.5 | * | 0.42 | 7.0 | 0.41 | Jordan | 50.7 | * | 1.57 | ‡ | † | |||||
Italy | 19.5 | * | 0.67 | 6.7 | 0.35 | Malaysia | 52.7 | * | 1.71 | ‡ | † | |||||
Czech Republic | 16.9 | 1.21 | 6.1 | * | 0.55 | Indonesia | 55.2 | * | 2.18 | ‡ | † | |||||
Iceland | 21.0 | * | 0.72 | 5.8 | * | 0.51 | Kazakhstan | 57.1 | * | 1.56 | ‡ | † | ||||
Portugal | 18.8 | 1.42 | 5.8 | * | 0.61 | |||||||||||
Hungary | 19.7 | 1.22 | 5.6 | * | 0.75 | |||||||||||
Spain | 18.3 | 0.76 | 5.5 | * | 0.30 | U.S. state education systems | ||||||||||
Austria | 19.5 | 1.07 | 5.5 | * | 0.61 | |||||||||||
Denmark | 14.6 | 1.07 | 5.4 | * | 0.62 | Massachusetts | 11.5 | * | 1.37 | 16.1 | * | 1.98 | ||||
Greece | 22.6 | * | 1.24 | 5.1 | * | 0.61 | Connecticut | 13.2 | 1.76 | 14.5 | * | 1.68 | ||||
Slovenia | 21.1 | * | 0.68 | 5.0 | * | 0.43 | Florida | 17.5 | 2.00 | 5.5 | * | 1.02 | ||||
† Not applicable. ! Interpret data with caution. Estimate is unstable due to high coefficient of variation. # Rounds to zero. ‡ Reporting standards not met. * p<.05. Significantly different from the U.S. percentage at the .05 level of statistical significance. NOTE: Education systems are ordered by 2012 percentages of 15-year-olds in levels 5 and above. To reach a particular proficiency level, a student must correctly answer a majority of items at that level. Students were classified into reading proficiency levels according to their scores. Exact cut scores are as follows: below level 1b (a score less than or equal to 262.04); level 1b (a score greater than 262.04 and less than or equal to 334.75); level 1a (a score greater than 334.75 and less than or equal to 407.47); level 2 (a score greater than 407.47 and less than or equal to 480.18); level 3 (a score greater than 480.18 and less than or equal to 552.89); level 4 (a score greater than 552.89 and less than or equal to 625.61); level 5 (a score greater than 625.61 and less than or equal to 698.32); and level 6 (a score greater than 698.32). Scores are reported on a scale from 0 to 1,000. The OECD average is the average of the national percentages of the OECD member countries, with each country weighted equally. Standard error is noted by s.e. Italics indicate non-OECD countries and education systems. Results for Connecticut, Florida, and Massachusetts are for public school students only. This table corresponds to figure 3 in Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Mathematics, Science, and Reading Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2014-024). SOURCE: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), 2012. |