Remedial Education at Degree-Granting Postsecondary Institutions in Fall 2000

List of Tables and Figures

Tables

Table 1.-Number of degree-granting institutions that enrolled freshmen, and the percent of those institutions that offered remedial reading, writing, or mathematics courses, by institutional type: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 1)
Table 2.-Mean number of different remedial courses offered by degree-granting institutions that enrolled freshmen, by subject area and institutional type: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 2)
Table 3.-Percent of degree-granting institutions that provided remedial education services/courses to local business and industry, and the subject area and location of those services/ courses: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 3)
Table 4.-Number of entering freshmen at degree-granting institutions, and the percent of entering freshmen that enrolled in remedial courses, by subject area and institutional type: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 4)
Table 5.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses, percentage distribution indicating the approximate average length of time a student takes remedial courses at the institution, by institutional type: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 5)
Table 6.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in the given subjects, percentage distribution indicating the usual selection approach for remedial courses, by subject area and institutional type: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 6)
Table 7.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in the given subjects, percentage distribution indicating the most frequent requirement status for remedial courses, by subject area and institutional type: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 7)
Table 8.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in the given subjects, percentage distribution indicating the most frequent type of credit earned for remedial courses, by subject area and institutional type: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 8)
Table 9.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses, percent indicating that there is a limitation on the length of time a student may take remedial courses at the institution, and the percentage distribution indicating how the time limit on remediation is set, by institutional type: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 9)
Table 10.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in the given subjects, percentage distribution indicating the extent of restrictions on regular academic courses that students can take while taking remedial courses, by subject area: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 10)
Table 11.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in the given subjects, percentage distribution indicating the location within the institution of the most frequent provider of remedial education, by subject area and institutional type: Fall 1995 and 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 11)
Table 12.-Among Title IV degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in the given subjects, percentage distribution indicating how frequently computers are used by students as a hands-on instructional tool for on-campus remedial courses, by subject area and institutional type: Fall 2000 (Standard Errors for Table 12)
Table B-13.-Standard errors for the figures and for data not shown in tables: Fall 1995 and 2000

Figures

Figure 1.-Among Title IV degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in the given subjects, percentage distribution indicating various numbers of different remedial courses offered, by subject area: Fall 2000
Figure 2.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses in thegiven subjects, percentage distribution indicating various numbers of different remedial courses offered, by subject area: Fall 1995
Figure 3.-Among Title IV degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses, percent indicating that they offered remedial courses in academic subjects other than reading, writing, or mathematics, by institutional type: Fall 2000
Figure 4.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses, percent indicating that they offered remedial courses in academic subjects other than reading, writing, or mathematics, by institutional type: Fall 1995
Figure 5.-Among Title IV degree-granting institutions that did not offer remedial courses, percent indicating the reasons they did not offer remedial courses: Fall 2000
Figure 6.-Among degree-granting institutions that did not offer remedial courses, percent indicating the reasons they did not offer remedial courses: Fall 1995
Figure 7.-Percent of Title IV degree-granting institutions that provided remedial education services/courses to local business and industry, by institutional type: Fall 2000
Figure 8.-Percent of degree-granting institutions that provided remedial education services/courses to local business and industry, by institutional type: Fall 1995
Figure 9.-Among Title IV degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses, percent indicating that the institution offered remedial courses through distance education, by institutional type: Fall 2000
Figure 10.-Among degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses, percent indicating that the institution offered remedial courses through distance education, by institutional type: Fall 1995
Figure 11.-Among Title IV degree-granting institutions that offered remedial courses through distance education, percent indicating the types of technology used as a primary mode of instructional delivery for the remedial courses offered through distance education: Fall 2000

Top