References

American Council on Education. (1995). Computers, technology, and people with disabilities.Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Anderson, R.E., and Ronnkvist, A. (1999). The presence of computers in American schools. Irvine,CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University ofCalifornia, Irvine.

Allen, N., Kline, D., and Zelenal, C. (1997). The NAEP 1994 technical report (NCES 97-897).U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Ballator, Nada. (1997). The NAEP guide: A description of the content and methods of the 1994and 1996 Assessments (NCES 97-586). U.S. Department of Education. Washington,DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Ball, D. L. (1990). "Reflections and deflections of policy: The case of Carol Turner." EducationalEvaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 263-275.

Bare, J., and Meek, A. (1998). Internet access in public schools (NCES 98-031). U.S. Departmentof Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Becker, H. J. (1983). "School uses of microcomputers: Report #1 from a national survey."Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 3(2), 29-33.

Becker, H. J. (1985). How schools use microcomputers: Summary of the first national survey. Baltimore,MD: Center for Social Organization of Schools, Johns Hopkins University.

Becker, H. J. (1986). Instructional uses of school computers. Reports from the 1985 National Survey.Issue No. 3. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organizationof Schools.

Becker, H. J. (1990a). Effects of computer use on mathematics achievement. Findings from anationwide field experiment in grades five to eight. Classes: Rationale, study design, andaggregate effect sizes (Report No. 51). Baltimore, MD: Center for Research on Elementaryand Middle Schools.

Becker, H. J. (1990b). When powerful tools meet conventional beliefs and institutional constraints:National survey findings on computer use by American teachers. (Report No. 49). Baltimore,MD: Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.

Becker, H. J. (1991). "When powerful tools meet conventional beliefs and institutional constraints."The Computing Teacher, 18(8), 6-9.

Becker, H. J. (1994). Analysis and trends of school use of new information technologies. Irvine, CA:University of California, Irvine. Department of Education.

Becker, H. J. (1998). "Running to catch a moving train: Schools and informationtechnologies."Theory Into Practice, 37(1), 20-30.

Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directedstudent use. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations,University of California, Irvine, and the University of Minnesota..

Becker, H. J., Ravitz, J. L., and Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use ofcomputers and software. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technologyand Organizations, University of California, Irvine, and the University of Minnesota.

Byrom, E. (1998). Factors influencing the effective use of technology for teaching and learning:Lessons learned from the SEIRTEC intensive site schools. Greensboro, NC: SERVE, Inc.

Calderone, J., Horkay, N. and King, L.M. (1997). The NAEP guide: A description of the contentand methods of the 1997 and 1998 Assessments (NCES 97-990). U.S. Department ofEducation. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Carpenter, J. (1996). E.D.TAB: Advanced telecommunications in U.S. public elementary andsecondary schools, 1995 (NCES 96-854). U.S. Department of Education. Washington,DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

CEO Forum on Education and Technology. (2000). The power of learning: Integrating digitalcontent. Washington, DC: Author.

Clark, R. E. (1994). "Media will never influence learning." Educational Technology Researchand Development, 42(2), 21-29.

Cohen, D. K. (1990). "A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier." EducationalEvaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 327-345..

Coley, R., Cradler, J., and Engel, P. K. (1997). Computers and classrooms: The status of technologyin U.S. schools. Policy information report. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Dunn, O. J. (1961). "Multiple Comparisons Among Means." Journal of the American StatisticalAssociation, 56: 52-64

Fullan, M. with Steigelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York:Teachers College Press..

Fulton, K. (1997). Learning in a digital age: Insights into the issues: The skills students need fortechnological fluency. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology..

Glennan, T. K. and Melmed, A. (1996). Fostering the use of educational technology: Elements of anational strategy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Gorman, Steve. (1994). The 1992 NAEP Technical Report for the National Assessment (NCES94-490). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for EducationStatistics.

Heaviside, S., Farris, E., and Malitz, G. (1995). E.D.TAB: Advanced telecommunications in U.S.public schools, K-12 (NCES 95-731). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics.

Heaviside, S., Farris, E., and Riggins, T. (1997). Statistics in brief: Advanced telecommunicationsin U.S. public elementary and secondary schools, Fall 1996 (NCES 97-944). U.S. Departmentof Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Kozma, R. B. and Croninger, R. G. (1992). Technology and the fate of at-risk students. Educationand Urban Society, 24(4), 440-453.

Levin, D., Stephens, M., Kirshstein, R., and Birman, B. (1998). Toward assessing the effectivenessof using technology in K-12 education. U.S. Department of Education. Washington,DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Lewis, L., Parsad, B., Carey, N., Bartfai, N., Farris, E., and Smerdon, B. (1999). Teacher quality:A report on the preparation and qualifications of public school teachers (NCES 1999-080).U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., and Kottkamp, R. (1999). West Virginia story: Achievementgains from a statewide comprehensive instructional technology program. Santa Monica,CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.

McLaughlin, M. W. and Oberman, I. (Eds.). (1996). Teacher learning: New policies and practices.New York: Teachers College Press.

Means, B. and Olson, K. (1995). Technology's role in education reform: Findings from a nationalstudy of innovating schools (Contract No. RR 9117010). U.S. Department of Education.Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Moursund, D. and Bielefeldt, T. (1999). Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age? Anational survey on information technology in teacher education. Santa Monica, CA: MilkenExchange on Education Technology and the International Society for Technology inEducation.

National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. (1996). What matters most: Teachingfor America's future. New York: Author.

Peterson, P. L. (1990). "Doing more in the same amount of time: Cathy Swift." EducationalEvaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(3), 277-296.

Phillips, G., and Johnson, E. (1991). NAEP: Technical Summary Report (NCES 91-1051). U.S.Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Piele, P. K. (1990). "The politics of technology utilization," in D. E. Mitchell and M. E. Goertz(Eds.), Education politics for the new century: The twentieth anniversary yearbook of thePolitics of Education Association (pp. 93-106). New York: The Falmer Press.

President's Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology. (1997). Report to the Presidenton the use of technology to strengthen K-12 education in the United States. Washington,DC: Author.

Rowand, C. (1999). Internet access in public schools: 1994-1998 (NCES 99-017). U.S. Departmentof Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Snyder, T., and Wirt, J. (1998). The Condition of Education 1998 (NCES 98-013). U.S. Departmentof Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Software and Information Industry Association. (2000). 2000 report on the effectiveness of technologyin schools: Executive summary. Washington, DC: Author.

Sprinthall, N. A., Reiman, A. J., and Theis-Sprinthall, L. (1996). "Teacher professional development,"in J. P. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, and E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research onteacher education (pp. 666-703). New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.

Sutton, R. E. (1991). "Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research." Review ofEducational Research, 61(4), 475-503.

Trotter, A. (1999). "Preparing teachers for the digital age." Education Week, 19, 37-43.

U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making theconnection (OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, A Note from the ChiefStatistician, No. 2, 1993.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993).Using technology to support education reform (Contract No. RR91172010). B. Means, J.Blando, K. Olson, T. Middleton, C.C. Morocco, A.R. Remz, and J. Zorfass. Washington,DC.

U.S. Department of Education. (1996). Getting America's students ready for the 21st Century:Meeting the technology literacy challenge. A report to the Nation on technology and education.Washington, DC: Author.

U.S. Department of Education. (2000). Educational technology programs at the U.S. Departmentof Education. Washington DC: Author.

Williams, C. (2000). Internet access in public schools: 1994-1999 (NCES 2000-086). U.S.Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology andstudent achievement in mathematics (Policy Information Report). Princeton: Educational

Top