Title: | Alternative student growth measures for teacher evaluation: Profiles of early‑adopting districts |
Description: | States and districts are beginning to use student achievement growth — as measured by state assessments (often using statistical techniques known as value-added models or student growth models) — as part of their teacher evaluation systems. But this approach has limited application in most states, because their assessments are typically administered only in grades 3–8 and only in math and reading. In response, some districts have turned to alternative measures of student growth. These alternative measures include alternative assessment-based value-added models (VAMs) that use the results of end-of-course assessments or commercially available tests in statistical models, and student learning objectives (SLOs), which are determined by individual teachers, approved by principals, and used in evaluations that do not involve sophisticated statistical modeling. For this report, administrators in eight districts that were early adopters of alternative measures of student growth were interviewed about how they used these measures to evaluate teacher performance. Key findings from the study are:
|
Online Availability: | |
Cover Date: | April 2014 |
Web Release: | April 29, 2014 |
Print Release: | April 29, 2014 |
Publication #: | REL 2014016 General Ordering Information |
Center/Program: | REL |
Associated Centers: | NCEE |
Authors: | Brian Gill, Brittany English, Joshua Furgeson, and Moira McCullough: Mathematica Policy Research |
Type of Product: | What's Happening |
Keywords: | |
Questions: |
For questions about the content of this What's Happening, please contact: Erin Pollard. |