 |
|
Chapter 2
Planning for School Facilities Maintenance
GOALS:
An essential component of an effective school program is a well-conceived
school facilities maintenance plan. A properly implemented plan provides
school administrators comfort and confidence when contemplating the future
of their campuses.
Effective Management Starts with Planning
Unless
facilities maintenance planning is a component of a greater organizational
management plan, it is doomed to failure. After all, how else can maintenance
planners be certain that other policy-makers share their priorities?
Or that funds will be available to achieve their goals? And how else
can they learn about demographic and enrollment projections and the
ensuing changes in building demand? Thus, facilities maintenance planning
must be an element of the overall organizational strategy-part of the
"master plan."
The
master plan is the "blueprint" for daily decision-making throughout a
school district. It provides concrete documentation about the organization's
needs and intentions. Moreover, it is a formal way of communicating the
district's priorities, and establishes necessary documentation for funding
authorities and other approving organizations. Good plans include short-
and long-term objectives, budgets, and timelines, all of which demonstrate
organizational commitment to facilities maintenance. Effective planning
also requires that planners evaluate both the organization's overarching
goals and the day-to-day details needed to meet those targets. Thus, a
comprehensive plan serves both as a blueprint for the here and now and
a road map to the future!
|
"Planning" is the formulation of a strategy for getting an organization
from the here and now to the future. As circumstances change over time,
strategies for achieving tomorrow's successes often change as well. Good
planners are always mindful of the need to review, and even revise, plans
to meet the changing needs of the organization.
|
Having said this, however, planners must also accept that the future
is not now (despite the adage that suggests differently). In other words,
change takes time, and improvements in organization-wide endeavors most
often occur in steps. If a school district finds itself in need of a major
overhaul in its facilities maintenance management system, it cannot expect
to jump to the head of the field in one or two years. Instead, planners
must institute improvements over longer time frames and accept that progress
is measured relative to the organization's starting point rather than
by comparisons with other organizations that may or may not be working
under comparable circumstances.
Why Collaborate
during Planning (and with Whom)?
In
many ways, the process of planning is more important than the outcome.
The process of formulating a plan establishes a forum through which interested
parties have a chance to voice their opinions about the future of the
organization. This opportunity, and the dialogue (and even debate) that
ensues, is an effective way of infusing fresh ideas and new perspectives
into school management. Collaborative planning also helps stakeholders
feel that their views are respected and valued. In turn, this atmosphere
of respect often fosters staff and community support for the decisions
being made about the future direction of the organization (and, perhaps
more importantly, the day-to-day steps that must be taken to achieve these
goals).
Good Intentions Don't Keep Schools Running
The
school facilities belonged to Ted, or so you'd think from the devoted
way in which he cared for them. He was the head of the facilities
maintenance department and took great pride in the condition of
the school district's buildings and grounds. He'd done a fabulous
job for nearly 30 years and knew the needs of the district like
the back of his hand. But the long-time superintendent had recently
retired, and there was a new sheriff in town. Ted had briefed the
newly hired superintendent on the status and future of the facilities
she had inherited and listened politely when she told him about
her own five-year plan. Ted hadn't agreed completely with her assessment
of the future, but thought that he'd give her a year or two to learn
on the job.
Six months later, Ted was tremendously upset when he found out that
the district was closing his favorite old elementary school. He'd never
thought the superintendent would actually do it and had repeatedly ignored
her warnings-choosing instead to revamp the facility for 21st century
instruction so that he could make a case for keeping the beautiful old
building when the time came. When news of the building's impending demise
arrived, he went straight to the superintendent to tell her that it was
a bad decision, but to no avail. She explained to him that demographic
reports showed that the school wouldn't be able to meet the needs of the
growing population. Moreover, funds had already been allocated for a new
building. The school supervisors were on board, she was on board, and
it was time for Ted to get on board. Ted took a deep breath, swallowed
his pride, and realized that the team had a new boss-and if he was going
to be a team player, he had to align his work with her goals. Their efforts
had to be coordinated. It was as simple as that. |
Developing a facilities maintenance plan requires:
|
 |
involving stakeholders in the planning process
|
|
 |
identifying needs (e.g., improving cleanliness
and safety, correcting deficiencies, addressing deferred projects,
increasing efficiency, decreasing utility bills)
|
|
 |
establishing priorities and targets
|
|
 |
collecting and using supporting data to
inform decision-making
|
|
 |
sharing the plan to garner support from
management and key stakeholders
|
|
 |
allocating funds to pay for planned activities
|
|
 |
training staff to implement planned activities
|
|
 |
implementing the plan
|
|
 |
being patient while awaiting cost savings
or other results
|
|
 |
evaluating the plan systematically
|
|
 |
refining efforts based on evaluation findings
|
|
 |
reviewing and revising the plan periodically
(e.g., every three years) |
|
|
Why include
stakeholders in the planning process?
- to hear new ideas and perspectives
- to demonstrate that planners value stakeholder
opinions
- to increase the likelihood that stakeholders
will "buy in" to the plan
|
Who
is involved in the planning process? Ideally, stakeholders include anyone
who has a "sense of ownership" in facilities decision-making, even though
they might not have any legal rights (or even expectations) to make decisions
about school facilities and property. As the list of stakeholders grows
larger, it often makes sense to include representatives of stakeholder
groups (rather than every individual) as long as the selection process
is conducted fairly and equitably.
Steps for effectively engaging stakeholders in the planning process
include:
|
 |
identifying all stakeholders
|
|
 |
determining appropriate ways to invite stakeholders
to share their opinions during the planning process (e.g., newspaper
ads, web sites, or direct mail)
|
|
 |
contacting stakeholders well in advance of the
planning meetings
|
|
 |
entering a dialogue that truly welcomes stakeholders'
opinions
|
|
 |
inviting stakeholders to share unique skills and
expertise they bring to the process (e.g., you may have engineers,
architects, or landscapers in the PTA who could lend their expertise)
|
|
 |
fostering a consensus-building atmosphere
|
|
 |
recognizing dissent as necessary, but not allowing
it to derail consensus building
|
|
 |
including stakeholders in follow-up documentation
and implementation efforts
|
Opinions Welcome: Stakeholders and the Planning Process
Potential stakeholders in the planning process include, but are not
limited to:
maintenance staff/contractors
custodial staff/contractors
superintendent(s)
principals
teachers
department of education staff againsters* |
parents
PTA representatives
taxpayers
school board members
school business officials partners (in joint-use facilities)
other government officials |
students
community groups/users foundation representatives
public safety officials/regulators city/county planners
dept. of environmental quality staff
expert consultants (architects, engineers, demographers, attorneys) |
*Againsters are people who make a habit of opposing any kind of change.
To minimize the likelihood of last-minute delay tactics, planners must
include these stakeholders in the decision-making process from the onset.
|
|
What does your
community value? The appearance of your community's school buildings says
a lot about its values. Some communities have gone one step further and
actively planned for their schools to reflect greater community values.
For example, one school district in Utah requires that art museums and
climbing walls be included in all new school construction to reflect the
community's belief in the importance of art, exercise, and nature.
A vision statement
is a proclamation of how an organization, department, group, or individual
wants to see itself in the future.
|
Creating
a Unified Organizational Vision
vision\ vizh- n\
n: the act or power of seeing; unusual discernment or foresight.
After planners (including stakeholders) have been identified, the first and most important step in the planning process is achieving agreement on the desired outcome of the organization's efforts-that is, what is the group hoping that the plans will lead to in the future? A good way of clarifying and specifying these expectations is by developing a vision statement that affirms how an entity wants to see itself in the future. An individual can have a vision statement, as can a department, group, or even an entire organization. The purpose of a vision statement is to develop a shared image of the future, which means gaining consensus about priorities. Thus, if an individual or department in an organization has a vision for its future, it cannot conflict with the vision of the larger organization within which they work. The vision for the facilities maintenance department, for example, must be driven by, and aligned with, the mission and goals of the district it serves; otherwise, the facilities manager and school superintendent will come into conflict-which is not good for the school district and certainly not good for the facilities manager!
Some administrators might argue that the goal of the maintenance department is simply that of the greater district it serves. However, it becomes difficult to operationalize such a "vision" that is not closely related to the day-to-day operations of the department. Thus, it is good practice for the facilities department to collaborate with representatives of the rest of the organization when generating consensus about its vision but, at the same time, to create a vision that directly relates to its day-to-day activities.
A vision statement should be a living document, but not short-lived. Otherwise, it can't inform long-term decision-making and investment. All
the same, a vision statement must be reviewed regularly to ensure that it remains relevant to the potentially changing needs of the organization. Investing time in creating a vision statement can save energy in the long run
by reminding staff of their priorities, but it is not an answer in itself-the work of maintaining a building still needs to get done. The vision statement merely (but not unimportantly) sets the goal against which policies, practices,
and efforts will be evaluated. For this reason, a vision statement should be supported by measurable objectives.
|
|
|
Creating a "vision"
should take place in a creative atmosphere. Brainstorming, free-thinking,
and open-mindedness are essential aspects of an honest assessment of an
organization's desired future.
|
The
National School Boards Association's online toolkit for "Creating a Vision"
(http://www.nsba.org/sbot/toolkit/cav.html)
recommends that when creating a vision statement, it helps to:
|
 |
describe an ideal future for the organization
|
|
 |
think about the organization's best interests
and not individual or department interests
|
|
 |
stretch one's thinking
|
|
 |
be open to change (even substantial change if
that is deemed necessary)
|
|
 |
be positive and inspiring
|
|
 |
be clear |
Moreover, when creating a vision statement, it is important to avoid:
 |
closed-mindedness |
 |
parochialism |
 |
selfishness |
 |
disrespect |
 |
short-term thinking |
 |
partisanship |
|
|
complacency |
|
infighting |
|
fear of change |
|
apathy |
|
"reality" ("we don't have the budget for that
anyway") |
|
|
Although a vision
statement should be of a lasting nature, it must be revisited periodically
to verify its continued relevance in an ever-changing world.
|
For
more information about creating a vision,
visit the following web pages: "Creating a Vision" (National School Boards
Association) at http://www.nsba.org/sbot/toolkit/cav.html; "A Visioning
Process for Designing Responsive Schools" (National Clearinghouse for
Educational Facilities) at http://www.edfacilities.org/pubs/sanoffvision.pdf;
and "Community Participation in Planning" (National Clearinghouse for
Educational Facilities) at http://www.edfacilities.org/rl/community_participation.cfm.
Examples of Unclear and Clear Vision Statements
Unclear: The Facilities Maintenance
Department will contribute to the school district's mission of
educating our children to meet the intellectual, physical, and
emotional demands of the 21st century.
While commendable, this
vision statement provides little direction for day-to-day decision-making
about the operations of the department.
Clear: The Facilities Maintenance Department
will provide a clean, orderly, safe, cost-effective, and instructionally
supportive school environment that contributes to the school district's
mission of educating our children to meet the intellectual, physical,
and emotional demands of the 21st century.
This vision statement
clearly and succinctly describes the department's role in the district's
overall mission, and provides a target that can direct the department's
day-to-day activities. |
Links to Budgeting and Planning
This
is not a capital planning guide, but any responsible examination of
school facilities planning warrants some discussion about the links
between facilities maintenance and facilities construction and renovation.
Capital outlay for school construction is generally a more palatable
proposition for taxpayers and public officials when a school district
demonstrates that appropriate care and maintenance has been given to
existing facilities.
Responsible facilities maintenance planning demands that attention be given to a wide range of other issues that influence organizational budgeting, including insurance coverage, land acquisition, equipment purchases, and building construction and renovation. While a detailed discussion of these issues is outside the scope of this Planning Guide, links to other resources that address these and other budgeting topics can be found at the end of this chapter.
For
more information about maintenance costs and budgeting, visit the following
web pages: "Budgeting for Facilities Maintenance and Repair Activities"
at http://www.nap.edu/books/NI000085/html/index.html
and "Maintenance & Operations Costs" at http://www.edfacilities.org/rl/mo_costs.cfm.
Facilities Managers, Good Accountants, and Common Sense Will
Tell You That:
The
maintenance and operations budget is for existing facilities and
equipment. Capital project funding - including staff time devoted
to capital projects - must come from other sources. Otherwise,
existing facilities will be neglected whenever there is a construction
or renovation project because the maintenance staff will be drafted
into service to work on capital improvements.
|
What A Shared Vision Can Accomplish
An
elementary school created a vision statement that emphasized each
child learning how to read. The development process included comprehensive
input from staff, students, and community members. Moreover, planners
went to great efforts to publicize the vision within the school
and community. Several days after the kick-off ceremony for the
school's Vision for the 21st Century, the principal noticed that
labels had appeared on objects throughout the school. The water
fountains were marked "water fountain," fire extinguishers were
labeled "fire extinguisher," and the smoke detectors were marked
"smoke detector." When the principal inquired about the phenomenon,
the school custodian admitted that he had posted the labels as his
contribution to helping the children learn how to read-and the principal
immediately knew that the team approach to developing and publicizing
the school's vision statement had been a success.
|
Experts in Residence: Maximizing Community Resources
The
facilities management planning team at Valley School District
had worked very hard to devise a strategy that would ensure a
sound future for the small district's grounds and buildings. Three
parents, two teachers, a vice principal, an assistant superintendent,
a school board member, the PTA president, the mayor's assistant,
the facilities manager, his assistant, and a custodian all came
to a consensus regarding the major points of the plan. When the
document was presented to the superintendent, she said that the
plan sounded very good but that she wanted to have it reviewed
by some construction and insurance specialists. The facilities
manager politely interrupted her, "Excuse me, ma'am, but I don't
think we need to do that." The superintendent looked at him with
surprise. "Why, Edward, I'm not doubting the planning team's abilities,
but it's my professional opinion that the plan should be reviewed
by experts outside the field of facilities management." "Oh, I
agree," Edward responded, "I just wanted to let you know that
we've already gotten input from an insurance agent and a developer,
and we didn't need to pay for it either. You see, Mr. Jackson,
who has a child in the high school, is a developer, and Mrs. Ramirez,
the PTA president, is a commercial real estate agent. What's more,
Mrs. Allen, who is also a parent, is an accountant, and she's
verified that all of our financial projections are sound." The
superintendent looked at the group, "My goodness, you've done
a thorough job. And efficient too." She looked to the community
volunteers in particular, "We owe you thanks not only for your
time, but also for your expertise." The facilities manager smiled,
knowing that he and his team had done a good job and maximized
their community's resources to benefit the district. The project
would go on without delay or additional expense.
|
|