View Quarterly by:
This Issue | Volume and Issue | Topics
|
|||
| |||
This article was originally published as the Executive Summary of the Technical Report of the same name. The universe data are from the NCES Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS). | |||
A well-known classification system for higher education in the United States was developed by the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education. Originally published in 1973and refined and updated in 1976, 1987, 1994, and 2000 the Carnegie classification system divides colleges and universities into categories based on their degree-granting activity (doctoral, master's, baccalaureate, and associate's). In addition, the Carnegie classification system identifies myriad "specialized institutions," such as theological seminaries, schools of law, teachers colleges, and medical schools. A limitation of the Carnegie classification system is how 2-year institutions are categorized. While there are six distinct subcategories for 4-year institutions, the 2000 Carnegie classification system places the 1,669 institutions that offer associate of arts degrees or certificates and with few exceptionsoffer no baccalaureate degrees into a single grouping, Associate's Colleges (The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching 2000). This single grouping of institutions accounts for more institutions than Doctoral/Research Universities, Master's Colleges and Universities, and Baccalaureate Colleges combined (1,478). Furthermore, the Carnegie classification includes only accredited and degree-granting institutions, excluding over 700 of the 2,427 2-year institutions with participation agreements for Title IV student aid funds, as found in the 1997-98 "Institutional Characteristics Survey" of the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) database. About half of all students in postsecondary education are enrolled in 2-year institutions.1 Placing all 2-year institutions into one category, thereby masking their differences, has limited the understanding of this crucial segment of higher education. While community colleges and other 2-year institutions often share a commitment to open access, comprehensiveness, and/or responsiveness to local needs, these unique American inventions are in fact a disparate group of institutions. The purpose of this report is to describe a classification system for 2-year institutions that can contribute to research and provide a framework for policy discussions.
This study used the IPEDS database. The universe of institutions consists of 2,068 Title IV participating 2-year postsecondary institutions that met the data criteria for this study.2 K-means cluster analysisin combination with various other procedures was the primary method used to classify these institutions. Cluster analysis is a multivariate statistical procedure that attempts to mathematically form "clusters," or groups of relatively homogenous entities, based on measures of similarity with respect to specific variables, while maximizing the differences between groups. A focus group of experts in the fieldresearchers, association leaders, and policy analystsalong with preliminary data analysis, determined which variables were both policy relevant and appropriate to be included in the cluster analysis procedure. The results of the cluster analysis, in conjunction with subsequent analyses, revealed which variables created the most distinguishable categories of institutions.
The universe of institutions was first separated into three sectors by institutional controlpublic, private not-for-profit, and private for-profit. Further analyses were conducted within each sector, resulting in the seven-category classification system described below (figure A).
Public institutions Size of institutional enrollment is the most distinguishing characteristic of public 2-year institutions. Below is a brief description of the three categories within this sector:
Figure A.Classification system of 2-year institutions NOTE: The sum of the number of institutions in each category does not add to the total number of institutions due to missing data in the variables chosen for categorization. In the universe of 2,068 institutions analyzed in this report, 61 institutions could not be placed in a final category: 15 public 2-year institutions, 16 private not-for-profit institutions, and 30 private for-profit institutions. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), 1997 Full Collection Year. Community Development and Career Institutions are institutions with an unduplicated headcount of less than 2,000 students. These institutions tend to confer awards and degrees primarily in job and career skills development, and to focus on overall workforce development for the communities they serve. Community Connector Institutions are institutions with an unduplicated headcount of 2,000 to 9,999 students. These institutions tend to confer awards and degrees that target job and career skills development, and to offer academic programs with some component of general education that can facilitate transfer to 4-year institutions. Community Mega-Connector Institutions are institutions with an unduplicated headcount of at least 10,000 students. These institutions tend to be in urban locations, to confer awards and degrees that target job and career skills development, and to offer academic programs with some component of general education that can facilitate transfer to 4-year institutions.
Private not-for-profit institutions The percentage of total awards granted that are in allied health programs is the distinguishing characteristic of private not-for-profit 2-year institutions. Two categories were created within this sector: Allied Health Institutions are institutions that grant 100 percent of their awards in allied health programs. These institutions tend to be small in enrollment and to have an exclusive focus on allied health training. Connector Institutions are institutions that grant less than 100 percent of their awards in allied health programs. These institutions tend to confer awards and degrees that target job and career skills development, and to offer academic programs with some component of general education that can facilitate transfer to 4-year institutions.
Private for-profit institutions A distinguishing characteristic of private for-profit 2-year institutions is the percentage of total awards granted that are certificates. Below is a description of the two categories within this sector: Career Connector Institutions are institutions that grant less than 100 percent of their awards as certificates. They are degree-granting institutionsalthough many also offer certificatesthat target job and career skills development. Many of these institutions offer academic programs with some component of general education that can facilitate transfer to 4-year institutions. Certificate Institutions are institutions that grant 100 percent of their awards as certificates. These institutions provide specialized training, usually in a single job category or area.
Footnotes
1This enrollment information is based on the NCES 1995-96 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:96), Data Analysis System.
2About 350 institutions were not included in this study because of inconsistencies in their data reporting in the different IPEDS surveys.
The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. (2000). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Available: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/Classification/CIHE2000/Tables.htm
|