View Quarterly by:
This Issue | Volume and Issue | Topics
|
|||
| |||
This article was originally published as the Introduction and Highlights of the E.D. Tabs report of the same name. The sample survey data are from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88). | |||
Introduction
This report uses postsecondary transcript data collected as part of the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88/2000) to examine aspects of the (1) postsecond- ary attainment, (2) postsecondary attendance patterns, (3) postsecondary curriculum, and (4) postsecondary performance of a cohort of approximately 9,5001 individuals (ages 26-27) who were in the 12th grade in 1992 and attended institutions of postsecondary education2 during the period 1992-2000. Most of these individuals were eighth-graders in 1988 and graduated from high school in 1992.3 All tables in this report follow their histories through December 31, 2000. In addition to the postsecondary variables that were built from data recorded from postsecondary transcripts, this report uses data collected from previous waves of NELS:88, including high school transcript data. Thus, it is possible to examine the relationship between postsecondary histories and outcomes and earlier high school experiences, attainment, and coursetaking. The evidence of student records as set forth in postsecondary transcript information offers cogent documentation of precisely what college students study, when and where they study it, and how well they perform in each course. It is important to note that transcript records do not do anything more than that. They do not tell us how much students have learned, whether the learning is retained, or what classroom experiences, teaching methods, or delivery systems produced the best results. For any one student, they provide only an outline of educational history, but an outline that suggests productive paths to analysis. Highlights
The collection of tables in the full report is designed to illustrate some of the range and analytical promise of the NELS:88/2000 Postsecondary Transcript Files. Highlights include the following: Attainment
Attendance
Curriculum
Performance
|
Table A. Percentage distribution of the highest postsecondary attainment of 1992 12th-graders who were likely postsecondary participants, by race/ethnicity, sex, and socioeconomic status: 1992–2000
1"Some postbaccalaureate enrollment" includes both incomplete graduate degrees and nondegree postbaccalaureate coursework.
2"Graduate" includes master's, first-professional, and doctoral degrees. 3Race categories exclude Hispanic origin unless specified. NOTE: "All likely postsecondary participants" include (1) those for whom transcripts were received; and (2) those for whom transcripts were requested but not received, and for whom other evidence in the NELS files supports the student's report of postsecondary attendance (see expanded description in appendix B, section 5.1, of the full report). Weighted N=1.9 million. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88/2000), "Fourth Follow-up, Postsecondary Education Transcript Study (PETS), 2000." (Taken from table 1 on p. 5 of the complete report from which this article is excerpted.) |
Table B. Percentage distribution of the type of postsecondary institution first attended by 1992 12th-graders, by selected student characteristics: 1992–2000
1"Other sub-baccalaureate" includes 2-year institutions other than community colleges and nondegree-granting schools.
2Race categories exclude Hispanic origin unless specified. NOTE: Data refer to individuals' true institution of first attendance, which excludes postsecondary institutions attended while the student was still in high school, institutions attended in the summer between high school graduation and fall semester entry (unless the institution was the same for both periods), and "false starts" (i.e., when the student withdraws without earning any additive credits from the ostensible first postsecondary institution in the first term of attendance but enrolls in another institution and earns credits at that institution at a later date). Universe consists of all for whom a true postsecondary institution of first attendance could be determined. Weighted N=2.0 million. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88/92/2000): "Second Follow-up, High School Transcript Study, 1992," and "Fourth Follow-up, Postsecondary Education Transcript Study (PETS), 2000." (Taken from table 8 on p. 14 of the complete report from which this article is excerpted.) |
Table C. Percentage distribution of the highest postsecondary degree, by highest level of mathematics completed in high school: 1992–2000
#Rounds to zero.
NOTE: The universe consists of all known postsecondary participants for whom the highest level of mathematics completed in high school could be determined. Weighted N=2.0 million. Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88/92/2000): "Second Follow-up, High School Transcript Study, 1992," and "Fourth Follow-up, Postsecondary Education Transcript Study (PETS), 2000." (Taken from table 11 on p.19 of the complete report from which this article is excerpted.) |
Footnotes 1Of the approximately 12,100 students in the NELS:88/2000 panel, about 9,600 (75.2 percent, weighted) reported having attended at least one postsecondary institution. Based on received in-scope transcripts and, when transcripts were not received, other corroborating information (from National Student Loan Data Systems files, Advanced Placement and College Entrance Examination Board tests, and other student responses), about 9,400 (71.2 percent, weighted) were judged as "likely participants." Based only on received in-scope transcripts, about 8,900 (66.8 percent, weighted) were "known participants." See discussion of the determination of likely participation in section I and appendix B of the full report. 2"Postsecondary institutions" include not only 4-year colleges and universities, 2-year colleges, and other degree-granting institutions but also noncollegiate institutions awarding less-than-2-year certificates. 3Of the high school graduates in the NELS cohort, 3.3 percent had received a diploma or GED by December of 1991, and 1 percent of those who entered postsecondary education had done so by the same date. The tables in this report use the bracketing dates of 1992-2000 to mark the modal year of high school graduation and date of postsecondary entry (1992). By confining the universe to those survey participants who were in the 12th grade in 1992, early high school graduates, dropouts, students who had been retained in grade, and those who were not in school in 1992 are excluded. The populations under study are thus skewed toward higher levels of academic preparation and performance. 4Race categories exclude Hispanic origin unless specified. 5True institution of first attendance excludes postsecondary institutions attended while the student was still in high school, institutions attended in the summer between high school graduation and fall semester entry (unless the institution was the same for both periods), and "false starts" (i.e., when the student withdraws without earning any additive credits from the ostensible first postsecondary institution in the first term of attendance but enrolls in another institution and earns credits at that institution at a later date).
|