Table 265. | Doctor's degrees\1\ conferred by institutions of higher education, by racial/ethnic group and sex of student: 1976-77 to 1993-94 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | | | | |American | Year and sex | Total | White, | Black, |Hispanic | Asian/ | Indian/ | Non- of student | | non- | non- | | Pacific | Alaskan | resident | |Hispanic|Hispanic| |Islander | Native | alien --------------------|----------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------- 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 --------------------|----------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------- | Number of degrees conferred |--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1976-77, total\2\ ..| 33,126 | 26,851 | 1,253 | 522 | 658 | 95 | 3,747 Men ..............| 25,036 | 20,032 | 766 | 383 | 540 | 67 | 3,248 Women ............| 8,090 | 6,819 | 487 | 139 | 118 | 28 | 499 | | | | | | | 1978-79, total\3\ ..| 32,675 | 26,138 | 1,268 | 439 | 811 | 104 | 3,915 Men ..............| 23,488 | 18,433 | 734 | 294 | 646 | 69 | 3,312 Women ............| 9,187 | 7,705 | 534 | 145 | 165 | 35 | 603 | | | | | | | 1980-81, total\4\ ..| 32,839 | 25,908 | 1,265 | 456 | 877 | 130 | 4,203 Men ..............| 22,595 | 17,310 | 694 | 277 | 655 | 95 | 3,564 Women ............| 10,244 | 8,598 | 571 | 179 | 222 | 35 | 639 | | | | | | | 1984-85, total\5\ ..| 32,307 | 23,934 | 1,154 | 677 | 1,106 | 119 | 5,317 Men ..............| 21,296 | 15,017 | 561 | 431 | 802 | 64 | 4,421 Women ............| 11,011 | 8,917 | 593 | 246 | 304 | 55 | 896 | | | | | | | 1986-87, total\6\ ..| 34,041 | 24,434 | 1,057 | 751 | 1,098 | 105 | 6,596 Men ..............| 22,061 | 14,812 | 485 | 441 | 794 | 57 | 5,472 Women ............| 11,980 | 9,622 | 572 | 310 | 304 | 48 | 1,124 | | | | | | | 1988-89, total\6,7\ | 35,659 | 24,884 | 1,066 | 629 | 1,323 | 85 | 7,672 Men ..............| 22,597 | 14,541 | 491 | 350 | 945 | 50 | 6,220 Women ............| 13,062 | 10,343 | 575 | 279 | 378 | 35 | 1,452 | | | | | | | 1989-90, total\6,8\ | 38,113 | 25,880 | 1,153 | 788 | 1,235 | 99 | 8,958 Men ..............| 24,248 | 15,105 | 533 | 423 | 871 | 49 | 7,267 Women ............| 13,865 | 10,775 | 620 | 365 | 364 | 50 | 1,691 | | | | | | | 1990-91, total\6,9\ | 38,547 | 25,328 | 1,211 | 732 | 1,459 | 102 | 9,715 Men ..............| 24,333 | 14,565 | 581 | 387 | 987 | 58 | 7,755 Women ............| 14,214 | 10,763 | 630 | 345 | 472 | 44 | 1,960 | | | | | | | 1991-92, total\6,10\| 40,090 | 25,813 | 1,223 | 811 | 1,559 | 118 | 10,566 Men ..............| 25,168 | 14,674 | 576 | 458 | 1,062 | 65 | 8,333 Women ............| 14,922 | 11,139 | 647 | 353 | 497 | 53 | 2,233 | | | | | | | 1992-93, total\6,11\| 42,021 | 26,700 | 1,352 | 827 | 1,582 | 106 | 11,454 Men ..............| 25,980 | 14,902 | 615 | 439 | 1,041 | 51 | 8,932 Women ............| 16,041 | 11,798 | 737 | 388 | 541 | 55 | 2,522 | | | | | | | 1993-94, total\6,12\| 43,149 | 27,156 | 1,393 | 903 | 2,025 | 134 | 11,538 Men ..............| 26,531 | 15,126 | 631 | 465 | 1,373 | 66 | 8,870 Women ............| 16,618 | 12,030 | 762 | 438 | 652 | 68 | 2,668 |==========|========|========|=========|=========|=========|========== | Percentage distribution of degrees conferred |--------------------------------------------------------------------- 1976-77, total\2\ ..| 100.0 | 81.1 | 3.8 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 0.3 | 11.3 Men ............. | 100.0 | 80.0 | 3.1 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 13.0 Women ............| 100.0 | 84.3 | 6.0 | 1.7 | 1.5 | 0.3 | 6.2 | | | | | | | 1978-79, total\3\ ..| 100.0 | 80.0 | 3.9 | 1.3 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 12.0 Men ............. | 100.0 | 78.5 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 2.8 | 0.3 | 14.1 Women ............| 100.0 | 83.9 | 5.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 0.4 | 6.6 | | | | | | | 1980-81, total\4\ ..| 100.0 | 78.9 | 3.9 | 1.4 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 12.8 Men ............. | 100.0 | 76.6 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 2.9 | 0.4 | 15.8 Women ........... | 100.0 | 83.9 | 5.6 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 0.3 | 6.2 | | | | | | | 1984-85, total\5\ ..| 100.0 | 74.1 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 0.4 | 16.5 Men ............. | 100.0 | 70.5 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 20.8 Women ........... | 100.0 | 81.0 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 0.5 | 8.1 | | | | | | | 1986-87, total\6\ ..| 100.0 | 71.8 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 19.4 Men ..............| 100.0 | 67.1 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 0.3 | 24.8 Women ............| 100.0 | 80.3 | 4.8 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 0.4 | 9.4 | | | | | | | 1988-89, total\6,7\ | 100.0 | 69.8 | 3.0 | 1.8 | 3.7 | 0.2 | 21.5 Men ..............| 100.0 | 64.3 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 4.2 | 0.2 | 27.5 Women ............| 100.0 | 79.2 | 4.4 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 0.3 | 11.1 | | | | | | | 1989-90, total\6,8\ | 100.0 | 67.9 | 3.0 | 2.1 | 3.2 | 0.3 | 23.5 Men ..............| 100.0 | 62.3 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 3.6 | 0.2 | 30.0 Women ............| 100.0 | 77.7 | 4.5 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.4 | 12.2 | | | | | | | 1990-91, total\6,9\ | 100.0 | 65.7 | 3.1 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 25.2 Men ..............| 100.0 | 59.9 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 4.1 | 0.2 | 31.9 Women ............| 100.0 | 75.7 | 4.4 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 0.3 | 13.8 | | | | | | | 1991-92, total\6,10\| 100.0 | 64.4 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 0.3 | 26.4 Men ..............| 100.0 | 58.3 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 4.2 | 0.3 | 33.1 Women ............| 100.0 | 74.6 | 4.3 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 0.4 | 15.0 | | | | | | | 1992-93, total\6,11\| 100.0 | 63.5 | 3.2 | 2.0 | 3.8 | 0.3 | 27.3 Men ..............| 100.0 | 57.4 | 2.4 | 1.7 | 4.0 | 0.2 | 34.4 Women ............| 100.0 | 73.5 | 4.6 | 2.4 | 3.4 | 0.3 | 15.7 | | | | | | | 1993-94, total\6,12\| 100.0 | 62.9 | 3.2 | 2.1 | 4.7 | 0.3 | 26.7 Men ..............| 100.0 | 57.0 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 5.2 | 0.2 | 33.4 Women ............| 100.0 | 72.4 | 4.6 | 2.6 | 3.9 | 0.4 | 16.1 --------------------|----------|--------|--------|---------|---------|---------|---------- |
\1\Includes Ph.D., Ed.D, and comparable degrees at the doctoral level. Excludes
first-professional degrees.
\2\Excludes 106 men whose racial/ethnic group was not available. \3\Excludes 53 men and 2 women whose racial/ethnic group was not available. \4\Excludes 116 men and 3 women whose racial/ethnic group was not available. \5\Excludes 404 men and 232 women whose racial/ethnic group was not available. \6\Reported racial/ethnic distributions of students by level of degree, field of degree, and sex were used to estimate race/ethnicity for students whose race/ethnicity was not reported. \7\Excludes 51 men and 10 women whose racial/ethnic group was not available. \8\Excludes 153 men and 105 women whose racial/ethnic group was not available. \9\Excludes 423 men and 324 women whose racial/ethnic group was not available. \10\Excludes 389 men and 180 women whose racial/ethnic group was not available. \11\Excludes 93 men and 18 women whose racial/ethnic group was not available. \12\Excludes 21 men and 15 women whose racial/ethnic group was not available. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, "Degrees and Other Formal Awards Conferred" surveys, and Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS), "Completions" surveys. (This table was prepared February 1996.)
|