2004 Tables and Figures | All Years of Tables and Figures | Most Recent Full Issue of the Digest |
Previous Page | Download Excel (37KB) |
Table 150. | States which use criterion-referenced assessments aligned to state standards, by subject area and level, and state: 2003-04 |
____________________________________________________________________________________________________ | Aligned to state | | Criterion-referenced assessments, | standards\1\ | Off-the- | by level and subject area State |_____________________| shelf/ |____________________________________________ | Test| Augmented| norm | English/ |Mathematics| Science | Social | custom-| or hybrid|referenced| language | | | studies/ | developed| test| test | arts | | | history | (CRT)| | (NRT) | | | | ______________________|__________|__________|__________|__________|___________|__________|___________ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6| 7| 8 ______________________|__________|__________|__________|__________|___________|__________|__________ Alabama ..............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | HS | HS Alaska ...............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | Arizona ..............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | Arkansas .............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | California ...........| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | HS | MS, HS | | | | | | | Colorado .............| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | MS | Connecticut ..........| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | HS | Delaware .............| | X | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS District of Columbia .| | | X | | | | Florida ..............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS| | | | | | | | Georgia ..............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Hawaii ...............| | X | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | Idaho ................| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | Illinois .............| X | X | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Indiana ..............| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | ES | | | | | | | | Iowa .................| | | X | | | | Kansas ...............| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | Kentucky .............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Louisiana ............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Maine ................| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS| | | | | | | | Maryland .............| X | X | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | HS | HS Massachusetts ........| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | ES, MS | Michigan .............| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Minnesota ............| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | Mississippi ..........| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | HS | HS | | | | | | | Missouri .............| | X | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Montana ..............| | X | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | Nebraska .............| X | | |ES, MS, HS| | | Nevada ...............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS| ES, HS | MS | New Hampshire ........| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | | | | | | | | New Jersey ...........| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | MS | New Mexico ...........| X | | X | ES, MS | | | New York .............| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS North Carolina .......| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | HS | HS North Dakota .........| | X | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | | | | | | | | Ohio .................| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Oklahoma .............| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Oregon ...............| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS| Pennsylvania .........| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | Rhode Island .........| X | X | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | | | | | | | | South Carolina .......| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS| ES, MS South Dakota .........| | X | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Tennessee ............| X | X | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS| ES, MS Texas ................| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | ES, HS | MS, HS Utah .................| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS| | | | | | | | Vermont ..............| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS| Virginia .............| X | | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Washington ...........| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | MS, HS | West Virginia ........| X | | X |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Wisconsin ............| X | X | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS Wyoming ..............| | X | |ES, MS, HS|ES, MS, HS | | ______________________|__________|__________|__________|__________|___________|__________|__________ |
\1\Custom-developed/criterion-referenced tests (CRTs) are explicitly designed to measure state content standards. NOTE: ES=elementary school, MS=middle school, and HS=high school. SOURCE: Education Week, January 8, 2004, Number 17, Editorial Projects in Education, Count Me In: Special education in an Era of Standards. (This table was prepared April 2005.)
|