Table of Contents | Search Technical Documentation | References
Unusually large school weights can occur under three circumstances:
If a school's base weight was determined to be too large, the school weight was trimmed. Recall schools were sampled for NAEP with probability proportional to size where size was based on student grade enrollment. If a sampled school had a small grade enrollment, its school base weight was large. To determine if a school's base weight was too large, a comparison was made between a school's base weight and its ideal weight (described below). If a school's base weight was more than three times its ideal weight, the school's base weight was scaled back or trimmed to three times the ideal weight. The trimming was accomplished by way of a trimming factor. The trimming factor for school s was calculated using the following formula:
where
EXP_WTs is the ideal base weight for school s, and
SCH_BWTs is the actual school base weight for school s.
The ideal weight for a school depends on the type of circumstance, whether it was a new school, private school, or school with large grade enrollment increase. Details of the trimming procedure by type of circumstance are described below.
New schools with a disproportionately large student enrollment in a particular grade from a school district (or Catholic diocese) that was selected with a small probability of selection were likely candidates to have their school weights trimmed. The school base weights for such schools may be large relative to what they would have been if they had been selected from the NAEP public or private school sampling frame. The ideal weight for a new school was as follows:
EXP_WTs is the ideal base weight the school would have received if it had been on the NAEP public or private school sampling frame.
For the 2017 NAEP assessment, six schools out of 165 participating schools selected from the new-school sampling frame had their weights trimmed: one at grade 4 and five at grade 8.
Private school PSS nonrespondents who participated in NAEP and were found subsequently to have either larger enrollments than assumed at the time of school sampling or an atypical probability of selection given their affiliation, the latter being unknown at the time of sampling, were also likely candidates to have their school weights trimmed. The ideal weight for a PSS nonresponding private school was as follows:
EXP_WTs is the ideal base weight the school would have received if it had been on the NAEP private school sampling frame with accurate enrollment and known affiliation.
For the 2017 NAEP assessment, three out of the four private school PSS nonrespondents who participated in NAEP had their weights trimmed, one at grade 4 and two at grade 8.
Schools, other than the PSS nonrespondents described above, whose enrollments determined at the time of student sampling were much larger than those assumed at the time of school sampling were also candidates to have their school weights trimmed. These schools have large relative school weights because their school probabilities of selection were artificially low. The ideal weight for a school with a large grade enrollment increase was as follows:
EXP_WTs is the ideal base weight the school would have received if it had been on the relevant NAEP public or private school sampling frame with the updated enrollment figure from student sampling.
For the 2017 NAEP assessment, only one school with a large grade enrollment increase, a grade 8 school, had its weight trimmed.