Skip to main content
Skip Navigation

Table of Contents  |  Search Technical Documentation  |  References

NAEP Sample Design → NAEP 2005 Sample Design → State Assessment Sample Design → School Participation in the 2005 State Assessment → Weighted Student Response Rates and Exclusion Rates, Science Assessment

NAEP Technical DocumentationWeighted Student Response Rates and Exclusion Rates, Science Assessment

The following table presents the overall weighted student response rates and exclusion rates for the science assessment. The weighted response rates utilize the student base weights and indicate the weighted percentage of assessed students as a percentage of all students to be assessed. The exclusion rates give the weighted percentage of excluded students with disabilities (SD) or are English language learners (ELL) as a percentage of all absent, assessed, and excluded students. Note that the table only includes those jurisdictions participating for science.

Weighted student response rates and exclusion rates, science state assessment, by jurisdiction: 2005
Domain Fourth grade Eighth grade
Weighted student response rate1 Weighted percent of all students who are SD and excluded2 Weighted percent of all students who are ELL and excluded2 Weighted student response rate1 Weighted percent of all students who are SD and excluded2 Weighted percent of all students who are ELL and excluded2
Total 93.42 2.63 1.37 90.47 2.62 0.88
Alabama 95.23 1.39 0.11 92.38 1.51 0.08
Arizona 93.30 3.15 2.53 88.98 2.88 2.43
Arkansas 93.43 1.76 1.80 91.52 2.12 0.96
California 93.54 2.31 3.05 90.99 1.79 1.53
California–Los Angeles 92.59 3.11 5.03 88.62 2.11 2.27
California–San Diego 93.40 2.55 3.51 90.09 2.50 2.31
Colorado 94.27 2.05 1.14 90.46 1.30 0.97
Connecticut 93.58 2.39 0.74 90.20 2.29 0.78
Delaware 92.78 4.20 1.23 89.48 6.44 0.66
Florida 92.99 1.78 1.33 89.53 2.40 1.33
Georgia 94.01 1.69 0.64 92.95 2.20 0.39
Georgia–Atlanta 93.87 1.74 0.08 89.12 1.96 0.34
Hawaii 95.08 2.09 1.21 88.38 2.30 1.33
Idaho 95.04 1.68 0.66 92.77 1.31 0.63
Illinois 93.40 1.88 1.23 90.83 2.02 0.85
Illinois–Chicago 94.56 3.29 2.27 92.42 1.91 1.88
Indiana 94.35 1.82 0.75 91.63 2.38 0.68
Kentucky 93.98 1.54 0.56 92.94 2.27 0.37
Louisiana 94.04 2.17 0.13 90.25 3.31 0.21
Maine 93.73 2.94 0.18 89.56 3.22 0.27
Maryland 94.26 2.08 0.70 87.16 2.22 0.36
Massachusetts 93.86 2.97 1.38 90.10 2.89 1.04
Massachusetts–Boston 93.12 4.99 3.93 90.36 4.52 3.06
Michigan 93.72 3.28 0.53 87.80 4.15 0.32
Minnesota 94.80 2.08 0.67 87.25 2.37 1.16
Mississippi 94.65 2.45 0.10 91.42 2.42 0.17
Missouri 93.37 2.12 0.54 91.00 2.42 0.13
Montana 93.87 2.01 0.20 92.47 2.62 0.57
Nevada 92.56 2.84 1.79 88.74 2.08 0.86
New Hampshire 92.86 2.02 0.33 89.38 2.17 0.36
New Jersey 92.86 2.59 1.23 88.66 2.94 1.10
New Mexico 93.43 1.97 1.37 90.59 2.34 1.74
New York–New York City 90.20 2.75 2.57 83.29 1.27 1.52
North Carolina 94.55 2.50 0.77 90.82 2.13 0.62
North Carolina–Charlotte 92.80 2.29 1.23 89.46 2.47 1.05
North Dakota 95.73 2.35 0.47 94.65 2.49 0.30
Ohio 93.31 3.44 0.20 89.25 4.16 0.15
Ohio–Cleveland 87.41 5.88 1.63 76.33 6.41 0.61
Oklahoma 94.61 3.09 0.68 91.41 2.86 0.78
Oregon 93.82 2.98 1.54 91.05 2.40 1.05
Rhode Island 93.06 1.91 1.35 91.52 2.65 0.73
South Carolina 94.36 3.39 0.45 92.92 3.53 0.87
South Dakota 95.02 1.11 0.37 94.13 1.41 0.46
Tennessee 93.42 3.12 0.52 90.62 2.79 0.37
Texas 93.88 5.92 2.82 92.25 4.15 1.50
Texas–Austin 92.73 5.96 4.43 91.04 5.88 4.68
Texas–Houston 93.82 5.47 3.83 87.74 3.61 3.45
Utah 94.66 2.43 1.23 92.20 1.97 0.70
Vermont 93.46 3.18 0.22 91.48 3.31 0.08
Virginia 94.20 2.65 0.90 92.02 2.74 0.81
Washington 93.16 2.37 1.24 89.88 2.21 1.46
West Virginia 93.53 2.32 0.00 90.79 2.35 0.06
Wisconsin 94.34 1.98 0.94 91.25 2.94 0.82
Wyoming 94.58 1.74 0.16 90.99 1.66 0.44
Other jurisdictions
DoDEA 93.17 1.30 1.08 93.82 0.57 0.68
1 Denominator is the total eligible sample less excluded cases.
2 Denominator is the total eligible sample.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005.

Last updated 13 April 2009 (JL)

Printer-friendly Version