Skip to main content

​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​NAEP Technical DocumentationProportion of Scale Score Variance Accounted for by the Population-Structure Models

For each assessment scale, the proportions of scale score variance accounted for by the population-structure model are given for each grade level. The numbers of principal components and group-defining variable contrasts used in the population-structure model are also provided.

The proportions in the tables indicate how strongly the scale score distributions are related to the groups to which students belong, as represented by the principal components. If the proportion of scale score variance accounted for by the population-structure model is one, all of the variability in the scores can be related to group membership as defined by the full set of variables in the population-structure model. The proportion of scale score variance accounted for by the population-structure model is

The quantity total variance minus residual variance divided by total variance 

where the total variance includes ​variance accounted for and unaccounted for by the variables in the population-structure model.

Beginning in 2022, five main reporting variables (school-reported gender, IEP status, LEP status, National School Lunch Program eligibility, and school-reported race/ethnicity) were added to the population-structure model directly along with the principal components. Please note that the new procedure was implemented for all 2022 assessments other than the ​age 9 long-term trend assessments.

Values of the proportion of scale score variance accounted for by the population-structure model range from approximately 0.50 to 0.98 in the national sample, depending on the subject area scale and sample for which it is calculated. The values are provided as documentation for each sample. However, for the purposes of NAEP, it is not necessary for the population-structure model to explain a high proportion of scale score variance. Student group membership cannot explain all the variance in the scale scores. The variation in the scale scores may also be due to ​variables not collected by NAEP.

Links to tables of the proportion of scale score variance accounted for by the population-structure model, national and state assessments, by subject area and year: Various years, 2000–2022
Subject areaYearNational assessmentGrade 4 state assessmentGrade 8 state assessmentGrade 12 state assessment
Arts2016 R3
2008 R3
Civics2022 R3
2018 R3
2014 R3
2010 R3
2006 R3
Economics2012 R3
2006 R3
Geography2018 R3
2014 R3
2010 R3
2001 R2/R3
Mathematics2022 R3 R3 R3
2019 R3 R3 R3
2017 R3 R3 R3
2015 R3 R3 R3
2013 R3 R3 R3 R3
2011 R3 R3 R3
2009 R3 R3 R3 R3
2007 R3 R3 R3
2005 R3 R3 R3
2003 R3 R3 R3
2000 R2/R3 R2/R3 R2/R3
Reading2022 R3 R3 R3
2019 R3 R3 R3
2017 R3 R3 R3
2015 R3 R3 R3
2013 R3 R3 R3 R3
2011 R3 R3 R3
2009 R3 R3 R3 R3
2007 R3 R3 R3
2005 R3 R3 R3
2003 R3 R3 R3
2002 R3 R3 R3
2000 R2/R3
Science2019 R3
2015 R3 R3 R3
2011 R3 R3
2009 R3 R3 R3
2005 R3 R3 R3
2000 R2/R3 R2/R3 R2/R3
Technology and engineering literacy (TEL)
2018 R3
2014 R3
U.S. history2022 R3
2018 R3
2014 R3
2010 R3
2006 R3
2001 R2/R3
Vocabulary2015 R3
2011 R3
2009 R3
Writing2011 R3
2007 R3
2002 R3 R3 R3
— Not available.
† Not applicable; subject was not assessed at this grade in this year.
NOTE: In NAEP, vocabulary, reading vocabulary, and meaning vocabulary refer to the same reporting scale. R2 is the non-accommodated reporting sample; R3 is the accommodated reporting sample. If sampled students are classified as students with disabilities (SD) or English learners (EL), and school officials, using NAEP guidelines, determine that they can meaningfully participate in the NAEP assessment with accommodation, those students are included in the NAEP assessment with accommodation along with other sampled students including SD/EL students who do not need accommodations. The R3 sample is more inclusive than the R2 sample and excludes a smaller proportion of sampled students. The R3 sample is the only reporting sample used in NAEP after 2001. Because preliminary analyses of students' writing performance in the 2017 NAEP writing assessments at grades 4 and 8 revealed potentially confounding factors in measuring performance, results will not be publicly reported.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 20002022 Assessments.

 

Links to tables of the proportion of scale score variance accounted for by the population-structure model, long-term trend assessments, by subject area and year: Various years, 2004–2023
Subject areaYearAssessmentNational assessment
Mathematics2022/2023​
​​Long-term trend R3
ReadingLong-term trend R3
​Mathematics2020​
Long-term trend R3
ReadingLong-term trend R3
Mathematics2012Long-term trend R3
ReadingLong-term trend R3
Mathematics2008Long-term trend R3
ReadingLong-term trend R3
Mathematics2004Long-term trend R3
ReadingLong-term trend R3
NOTE: R3 is the accommodated reporting sample. If sampled students are classified as students with disabilities (SD) or English learners (EL), and school officials, using NAEP guidelines, determine that they can meaningfully participate in the NAEP assessment with accommodation, those students are included in the NAEP assessment with accommodation along with other sampled students including SD/EL students who do not need accommodations. The R3 sample is more inclusive than the R2 sample and excludes a smaller proportion of sampled students. The R3 sample is the only reporting sample used in NAEP after 2001.​ In 2020 and 2022/2023, age 17 was not assessed. 
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 2004–2023​ Mathematics and Reading Long-Term Trend Assessments.








Last updated 24 July 2024 (SK)