State | State name | Number of schools used in mapping |
Estimated proportion of students meeting the state proficiency standard | Estimated NAEP score equivalent to the state proficiency standard |
Estimated standard error of the NAEP score equivalent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AK | Alaska | 103 | 0.73 | 191 | 2.1 |
AR | Arkansas | 115 | 0.62 | 203 | 1.7 |
CA | California | 216 | 0.38 | 217 | 1.3 |
CO | Colorado | 115 | 0.86 | 181 | 1.4 |
CT | Connecticut | 108 | 0.68 | 212 | 1.4 |
DC | District of Columbia | 103 | 0.47 | 190 | 1.1 |
FL | Florida | 104 | 0.58 | 211 | 1.2 |
GA | Georgia | 147 | 0.80 | 180 | 1.8 |
IA | Iowa | 129 | 0.77 | 196 | 1.9 |
ID | Idaho | 114 | 0.74 | 195 | 1.5 |
KY | Kentucky | 121 | 0.61 | 207 | 1.3 |
LA | Louisiana | 109 | 0.59 | 196 | 1.9 |
MA | Massachusetts | 161 | 0.54 | 225 | 1.3 |
ME | Maine | 145 | 0.50 | 224 | 1.2 |
MI | Michigan | 133 | 0.74 | 192 | 2.2 |
MS | Mississippi | 107 | 0.87 | 161 | 2.1 |
MT | Montana | 141 | 0.77 | 195 | 1.3 |
NC | North Carolina | 147 | 0.81 | 187 | 1.7 |
ND | North Dakota | 176 | 0.75 | 199 | 1.4 |
NJ | New Jersey | 109 | 0.77 | 195 | 1.7 |
NV | Nevada | 106 | 0.48 | 208 | 1.3 |
NY | New York | 145 | 0.64 | 209 | 1.5 |
OH | Ohio | 163 | 0.68 | 203 | 1.5 |
SC | South Carolina | 101 | 0.31 | 232 | 1.0 |
TX | Texas | 194 | 0.85 | 169 | 2.0 |
WA | Washington | 95 | 0.65 | 207 | 1.3 |
WI | Wisconsin | 127 | 0.82 | 186 | 1.2 |
WY | Wyoming | 145 | 0.44 | 229 | 0.9 |
NOTE: NAEP reading cut scores at grade 4 are 208 for Basic and 238 for Proficient. The following states' grade 4 reading test data were not used in the analysis or received special treatment: CT, LA, and OH—standard used for mapping is different from the standard specified as the AYP level; CA and LA—reading data not available for the state assessment, so English Language Arts (ELA) data used; AL, AZ, DE, HI, IL, IN, KS, MD, MN, MO, NH, NM, OK, OR, PA, RI, SD, TN, UT, VA, VT, and WV—state assessment data not available; NE—results deleted because state results are based on assessments developed by each local education agency. For more information about missing states and exclusion rates in each state, see A Profile of State Assessment Standards. For more information on the number of schools in the 2003 NAEP sample, see Appendix A (745K PDF) in The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2003. | |||||
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 Reading Assessment and National Longitudinal School-Level State Assessment Score Database (NLSLSASD). |
See more data tables on the potential effects of exclusion on mapping state proficiency standards onto NAEP scales.
Read more about comparing NAEP and state proficiency standards.
Read more about full population estimates.