State/jurisdiction | Reported estimate | Full population estimates (FPE) | Difference (reported minus FPE) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | 3.8 | 2.4 | 1.4 | ||
Alaska1 | 3.6 | * | 2.7 | 0.9 | |
Arizona | 1.2 | 1.5 | -0.3 | ||
Arkansas | 2.3 | 2.5 | -0.2 | ||
California | 1.8 | 1.9 | -0.1 | ||
Colorado | 5.4 | * | 5.9 | * | -0.5 |
Connecticut | 1.4 | 1.9 | -0.5 | ||
DoDEA2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.0 | ||
Delaware | 2.0 | * | 3.9 | * | -1.9 |
District of Columbia1 | 3.0 | * | 0.4 | 2.6 | |
Florida1 | 3.3 | 3.6 | * | -0.3 | |
Georgia | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.0 | ||
Hawaii | 3.1 | * | 3.3 | * | -0.2 |
Idaho | 2.5 | * | 2.7 | * | -0.2 |
Illinois | 2.8 | 1.1 | 1.7 | ||
Indiana1 | 3.3 | * | 2.5 | 0.8 | |
Iowa | 1.4 | 1.6 | -0.2 | ||
Kansas | 6.0 | * | 6.0 | * | 0.0 |
Kentucky1 | 4.7 | * | 2.8 | 1.9 | |
Louisiana | 4.6 | * | 4.6 | * | 0.0 |
Maine | 5.4 | * | 5.7 | * | -0.3 |
Maryland | 7.8 | * | 6.1 | * | 1.7 |
Massachusetts | 6.4 | * | 5.6 | * | 0.8 |
Michigan | -0.5 | -0.9 | 0.4 | ||
Minnesota | 1.8 | 2.0 | -0.2 | ||
Mississippi1 | 2.4 | 3.0 | * | -0.6 | |
Missouri1 | 4.2 | * | 3.4 | 0.8 | |
Montana | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.5 | ||
Nebraska | -0.3 | -1.2 | 0.9 | ||
Nevada | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | ||
New Hampshire1 | 2.3 | * | 1.6 | 0.7 | |
New Jersey | 4.7 | * | 4.7 | * | 0.0 |
New Mexico | 4.3 | * | 4.6 | * | -0.3 |
New York | 0.4 | 0.6 | -0.2 | ||
North Carolina | 2.1 | 2.6 | -0.5 | ||
North Dakota | 4.6 | * | 3.9 | * | 0.7 |
Ohio | 1.6 | -0.5 | 2.1 | ||
Oklahoma1 | 3.2 | * | 1.4 | 1.8 | |
Oregon | 1.6 | 1.3 | 0.3 | ||
Pennsylvania | 5.5 | * | 5.2 | * | 0.3 |
Rhode Island | 3.0 | * | 2.7 | * | 0.3 |
South Carolina | 0.3 | 0.7 | -0.4 | ||
South Dakota | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.1 | ||
Tennessee1 | 3.5 | * | 2.6 | 0.9 | |
Texas | 4.8 | * | 4.7 | * | 0.1 |
Utah | 1.9 | 1.5 | 0.4 | ||
Vermont | 3.7 | * | 3.0 | * | 0.7 |
Virginia1 | 3.3 | * | 2.8 | 0.5 | |
Washington | -0.2 | -0.9 | 0.7 | ||
West Virginia | 1.0 | 1.5 | -0.5 | ||
Wisconsin | 1.1 | 0.2 | 0.9 | ||
Wyoming | 4.9 | * | 4.7 | * | 0.2 |
* Statistically significant change. | |||||
1 The significance of the trend results from the officially reported sample for this jurisdiction would be different under the scenario. | |||||
2 Department of Defense Education Activity (overseas and domestic schools). | |||||
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 and 2007 Mathematics Assessments. |
Read more about the potential effects of exclusion rates on assessment results.