- Surveys & Programs
- Data & Tools
- Fast Facts
- News & Events
- Publications & Products
- About Us
NAEP - Nonaccommodated Estimate TUDA Grade 8 Reading
| District | All students | Non- accommodated students |
Difference (all students minus non- accommodated) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta | 5.5 | * | 3.9 | * | 1.6 |
| Austin | 0.3 | 1.2 | -1.0 | ||
| Boston | 0.7 | 2.2 | -1.5 | ||
| Charlotte | 0.2 | -0.4 | 0.6 | ||
| Chicago | 0.4 | 1.6 | -1.2 | ||
| Cleveland | 6.7 | * | 6.8 | * | -0.1 |
| District of Columbia1 | 2.6 | * | 0.4 | 2.2 | |
| Houston | 3.7 | * | 4.2 | * | -0.5 |
| Los Angeles | 0.9 | 1.7 | -0.8 | ||
| New York City | -1.9 | 0.9 | -2.8 | ||
| San Diego1 | -3.4 | -3.7 | * | 0.3 | |
| * Statistically significant change. | |||||
| 1 The significance of the trend results from the officially reported sample for this jurisdiction would be different for nonaccommodated students alone. | |||||
| NOTE: Differences are calculated using unrounded numbers. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 and 2007 Trial Urban District Reading Assessments. |
|||||
Read more about the relation of exclusion and accommodation rates to results.
Last updated 30 November 2007 (RF)
