| District | All students | Non- accommodated students |
Difference (all students minus non- accommodated) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta | 6.2 | * | 4.5 | * | 1.7 |
| Austin | 1.1 | 1.3 | -0.2 | ||
| Boston | 2.6 | 2.4 | 0.2 | ||
| Charlotte | 0.8 | 2.8 | -2.0 | ||
| Chicago | 2.1 | 2.7 | -0.6 | ||
| Cleveland | 0.9 | 1.3 | -0.4 | ||
| District of Columbia | 6.3 | * | 4.1 | * | 2.2 |
| Houston1 | -5.0 | * | -4.5 | -0.6 | |
| Los Angeles | 0.2 | 1.0 | -0.8 | ||
| New York City | 0.1 | 3.3 | -3.3 | ||
| San Diego | 2.4 | 3.2 | -0.8 | ||
| * Statistically significant change. | |||||
| 1 The significance of the trend results from the officially reported sample for this jurisdiction would be different for nonaccommodated students alone. | |||||
| NOTE: Differences are calculated using unrounded numbers. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 and 2007 Trial Urban District Reading Assessments. |
|||||
Read more about the relation of exclusion and accommodation rates to results.