| District | All students | Non- accommodated students |
Difference (all students minus non- accommodated) |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta | 2.9 | * | 2.6 | * | 0.3 |
| Austin | -1.2 | -0.5 | -0.7 | ||
| Boston | 3.5 | * | 4.0 | * | -0.5 |
| Charlotte | -0.6 | 0.2 | -0.9 | ||
| Chicago1 | 4.0 | 4.8 | * | -0.8 | |
| Cleveland | -4.6 | * | -4.3 | * | -0.3 |
| District of Columbia | 2.6 | * | 2.6 | * | 0.0 |
| Houston | 1.1 | 0.3 | 0.8 | ||
| Los Angeles | 0.7 | 1.0 | -0.3 | ||
| New York City | 5.5 | * | 7.5 | * | -2.0 |
| San Diego | 1.5 | 2.6 | -1.1 | ||
| * Statistically significant change. | |||||
| 1 The significance of the trend results from the officially reported sample for this jurisdiction would be different for nonaccommodated students alone. | |||||
| NOTE: Differences are calculated using unrounded numbers. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 and 2007 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments. |
|||||
Read more about the relation of exclusion and accommodation rates to results.