Archived Changes
Changes to IPEDS Data Collections, 2017-18
Background |
The proposed changes were first suggested during the public comment period associated with the last IPEDS clearance, for years 2016-17 through 2018-19 (OMB# 1850-0582), which took place during the early 2016. These proposed changes were further discussed and formulated during the IPEDS Technical Review Panel (TRP) that took place in August 2016. Meetings of the IPEDS TRP are convened by RTI International, the current contractor for the IPEDS web-based data collection system. In general, the subject areas for the meetings are determined by legislation, emerging areas of concern in postsecondary education, and an ongoing goal of decreasing reporting burden while retaining the federal data necessary for use by policy makers and education analysts. Detailed summaries of each meeting are posted online (https://edsurveys.rti.org/IPEDS_TRP) and comments on panel suggestions are solicited. Cumulatively, three meetings of the TRP have impacted the changes included in this clearance package, as summarized in table 1.
Other changes are based on NCES review of data quality reports and feedback from institutions and other stakeholders. The reasons behind the proposed changes are included in the following section, by survey component. |
Table 1. IPEDS TRP meetings relevant to proposed changes |
||
Topic (Date) |
Summary |
Survey Components Affected |
Selected outcomes of the Advisory Committee on Measures of Student Success (February and October 2012) |
The Committee on Measures of Student Success recommended that the Department of Education (ED) broaden the coverage of student graduation data to reflect the diverse student populations at 2-year institutions and improve the collection of student progression and completion data. In response, ED released an action plan for improving measures of postsecondary student success in support of the Administration’s college completion agenda and based on those recommendations.
Two IPEDS TRP meetings were convened to address these needs. The first panel suggested that NCES clarify the definition of a degree/certificate-seeking student for IPEDS reporting purposes and collect certain outcome information in IPEDS for first-time, part-time students. The second panel suggested that NCES collect certain outcome information in IPEDS for non-first-time students similar to information that was proposed by the first panel for first-time, part-time students. The panel also suggested that similar outcome information be collected for first-time, full-time students. |
· Outcome Measures |
Outcome Measures (September 2014) |
As of the date of TRP 45, the specifics regarding data elements, metrics, and data collection had not yet been finalized or released to the public. At the time, ED was in the planning stages of the forthcoming Postsecondary Institutional Rating System (PIRS), which was to create an effective postsecondary rating system used measures on access, affordability, and outcomes. This TRP was asked to revisit the Outcome Measures component and consider any changes that would help inform policymakers, consumers, and other stakeholders, and further improve outcome data in IPEDS.
This TRP considered a number of issues related to the Outcome Measures survey component. A few of the topics the TRP discussed were: collecting multiple cohort years, time-to-degree durations, time intervals, and subsequent awards earned from other institutions. In addition, the TRP deliberated on the addition of collecting outcomes by demographics and using Federal Student Aid (FSA) data. In these discussions, the issue of identifying Pell students and tracking their outcomes was identified as an important need to policymakers, researchers, and the public. |
· Outcome Measures |
Outcome Measures (August 2016) |
This TRP discussed the initial NCES proposal of adding a Pell Grant recipient cohort to the Outcome Measures survey component as well as additional suggestions, which were proposed through the IPEDS public comment period for the 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19 data collection. Specifically, the TRP discussed whether: (1) all non-degree-granting institutions report to Outcome Measures, (2) academic reporting institutions should report on a full-year cohort instead of fall-census cohort, (3) the Pell Grant recipient cohort should include students receiving Pell at entry or over the course of the eight-year period, (4) the four Outcome Measure cohorts should each have a sub-Pell Grant cohort instead of a single, total Pell Grant recipient cohort, and (5) the new award year at 4 years after entry should be added, and (6) institutions should report the award type [certificate, associate or bachelor] at each status year after entry - 4 years, 6 years, and 8 years. |
· Outcome Measures |
Detailed Proposed Changes to Forms by IPEDS Survey Component
Institutional Characteristics (IC, includes Header and Identification). Feedback from the IPEDS Help Desk suggests that the current format of the distance education questions on courses and programs should be combined into one question to decrease repetition and clarify what is being asked. |
Table 2. Changes to the Institutional Characteristics (IC) Form |
|||
Change |
Implementation year |
Source |
Estimated burden |
· Combining two separate distance education questions on courses and programs into one to clarify and improve data quality. |
2017-18 |
NCES Review |
No additional |
Outcome Measures (OM). The proposed changes to the 2017-18 OM survey component are primarily based on recommendations made during the August 23-24, 2016 Technical Review Panel (TRP) meeting, Outcome Measures 2017-18: New Data Collection Considerations. The August TRP was convened as a result of the public comments to the proposed changes for the 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19 data collections received during the 60-day and 30-day comment periods. The initial proposed change for the 2016-17, 2017-18, and 2018-19 collections was the addition of a fifth cohort, Pell Grant recipients; however, this proposed change received several comments against adding only a single cohort for Pell recipients.
Starting in the 2016-17 data collection year, the Graduation Rate (GR) survey component collected the 150% graduation rates for first-time, full-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who were Pell Grant recipients and Stafford borrowers who did not receive a Pell. To provide more Pell Grant recipient information on other types of undergraduates (e.g., non-first-time and part-time), NCES proposes to collect additional information on Pell Grant recipients through the following changes starting with the 2017-18 data collection year:
(1) All academic reporting institutions will begin reporting on a full-year cohort instead of fall-census date cohort. This proposed change would align the cohort coverage for all institutions and capture all cohort-eligible students who enter an institution at any point during the year. While some of the August TRP panelists cited a few concerns (i.e., loss of integration with the other IPEDS survey components and the increase in burden on institutions to track several cohorts for GR and OM), the change is critical if the Pell Grant cohorts (proposed change #2) are added to OM. One of the primary purposes for the creation of OM is to tell a more accurate completion story for institutions with small full-time, first-time student populations. Thus, for academic reporter institutions that enroll more nontraditional students or who enroll students outside of the fall semester, the full-year cohort better reflects the population of entering students. NCES is proposing that this year be defined as July 1-June 30, which matches the current collection period for 12 Month Enrollment but would be a change to OM for program reporters. The intent of the collection period is to include within a cohort students that are most similar.
One concern for academic reporters reporting on a full-year cohort is the question of how to report students who change their attendance status during the first full-year. NCES proposes that all students be assigned to a cohort at the point of entry to the institution. This guidance is similar to the GR and current OM guidance - once a student enters a cohort, the student remains in that cohort.
(2) Institutions will report a Pell Grant sub-cohort for each of the four Outcome Measure cohorts (i.e., full-time, first-time; part-time, first-time; full-time, non-first-time; and part-time, non-first-time), and NCES will calculate the respective sub-cohorts for non-Pell Grant recipients. Comments received through the public comment periods and the suggestions received during the August TRP overwhelmingly recommended not aggregating all Pell Grant recipients into a single cohort that combines attendance statuses and prior postsecondary experiences. Disaggregating Pell Grant recipients for each of the four cohorts allows for a more nuanced analysis and facilitates more meaningful comparisons across institutions.
(2a) Students who received a Pell Grant any time during the full cohort entry year will be included in one of the Pell Grant cohorts. Students who received a Pell Grant after the full-year are not included in the cohort. Initially, NCES proposed to count all students who received a Pell Grant at any time over the 8-year period in the Pell Grant OM cohort. While Pell at entry would undercount the number of Pell Grant recipients, TRP panelists noted that Pell at entry would provide a better measure of social capital at entry to improve comparisons, align the instructions with Pell graduation rates in the Graduation Rates survey component, and allow for less bias as most attrition occurs early in enrollment.
Recipients of Pell Grant dollars (disbursed) at that institution will be included in the Pell Grant sub-cohorts. Students who were awarded but did not receive a disbursement are not included.
(3) Institutions will begin reporting on a new award status at 4 years after entry. Currently, institutions report on an award status at 6 and 8 years after entry. Several comments from the public comment periods recommended that an award status at 4 years after entry should be collected to be in alignment with GR’s collection at 150% of normal time, which satisfies the Higher Education Act requirements, as amended.
(4) Institutions will begin reporting on the highest award (i.e., certificate/or equivalent, associate’s or bachelor’s) received at each status year after entry – 4 years, 6 years, and 8 years. The award statuses at 4, 6, and 8 years will be mutually exclusive (i.e., each student will be reported once at each status year, by the highest award level earned at that time). This change is different from previous OM instructions to report on the first award earned.
While some commenters recommended that award type should be reported based on award intent, the TRP strongly suggested that NCES collect data on award received because of the limitations associated with data on award intent. Students’ intent at entry may change, be unknown, or be unrealistic. Institutions with missions to prepare students for transfer would assign students to an award level that may not match actual intent. Finally, reporting on award sought could be manipulated to improve an institution’s metrics.
In sum, NCES has received thoughtful public comments and expert suggestions for improving the OM survey to collect more information on Pell Grant recipients, as several TRPs (#s 24, 37, 40, 45, and 50) have encouraged NCES to collect information on this vulnerable population. Data from the Federal Student Aid Data Center show that in 2014-15, the federal government disbursed $30.3 billion in Pell Grants to 8.4 million full- and part-time undergraduate students. In contrast, $13.1 billion was disbursed to 5.5 million students 10 years ago, reflecting a 10-year growth of the Pell Grant program by 131 percent in federal dollars to 50 percent more students. The Pell Grant program is a large commitment of public dollars to increase opportunities for the future workforce. The increased demands for accountability and transparency require measurement of the Pell Grant program. NCES notes that several of the public comments and the August TRP panelists aired concerns of the potential unintended consequences of evaluating an institution’s performance by metrics of how it educates Pell Grant recipients. While these concerns are important to keep in mind in evaluating the data, it is imperative for the federal government to have comparable and comprehensive institutional data on the Pell Grant recipient population.
Please note that due to the extent of changes, a number of updates were made to instructions and FAQs. It is advised that respondents review all instructions and FAQs before completing the OM form. |
Table 3. Changes to the Outcome Measures (OM) Form |
|||
Change |
Implementation year |
Source |
Estimated burden |
· Academic reporters will report on a full-year entering cohort: Similar to program reporters, all reporting institutions to the OM survey will be given the same instructions when creating their OM cohort: Institutions will report using a full-year cohort. Institutions will report on students that enrolled during the period between July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010. Students will be assigned to the appropriate cohort upon entry, and will remain in the assigned cohort. |
2017-18 |
Public Comments from 60-day and 30-day comment periods and from Outcome Measure TRP 50 |
Substantial |
· Four Pell Grant sub-cohorts will be reported for each of the four OM cohorts (FTFT, PTFT, FTNFT, and PTNFT). Students who received a Pell Grant (dollars disbursed) are included in the Pell Grant sub-cohorts. Institutions should not include students who were awarded a Pell Grant, but did not receive a disbursement. Institutions will identify and include Pell Grant recipients who enrolled and received a Pell Grant within the cohort coverage period of July 1, 2009 and June 30, 2010. Students who enrolled but did not receive a Pell Grant during the cohort coverage period, but received a Pell Grant after June 30, 2010 are not included in the Pell Grant sub-cohorts. |
2017-18 |
Public Comments from 60-day and 30-day comment periods and from Outcome Measure TRP 50 |
Substantial |
· A new award status of 4-years after entry will be added. Institutions will report the award status at 4-, 6- and 8-years. There is no change to enrollment status reporting requirements at 8 years after entry. |
2017-18 |
Public Comments from 60-day and 30-day comment periods and from Outcome Measure TRP 50 |
Substantial |
· At the 4-, 6-, and 8-year award statuses, institutions will report the highest award earned (i.e., certificates/equivalent, associate’s or bachelor’s). For each of the OM cohorts, a non-Pell Grant recipient sub-cohort will be calculated by subtracting the Pell Grant recipient sub-cohort from the total of the same OM cohort. Collect the status update from both 2- and 4-year degree-granting institutions at 8 years after the cohort enters the institution with award information collected for both the 6- and 8-year timeframes. Pell Grant recipient data collection will begin in 2017-18. Institutions will report on their 2009-10 cohorts. Note: Data will not be disaggregated by race, ethnicity, or gender. Note: No outcome data will be collected from non-degree-granting institutions. |
2017-18 |
Public Comments from 60-day and 30-day comment periods and from Outcome Measure TRP 50 |
Substantial |
Proposed Minor Changes to the IPEDS Data Collection starting in 2017-18
NCES also submits some more minor changes to IPEDS data collection materials each year to clarify online instructions, frequently asked questions, and data collection screens.
NCES regularly receives feedback from the IPEDS reporting community on areas that require clarification. Clarification changes were made to the following IPEDS collections: Academic Libraries, Admissions, Completions, Fall Enrollment, Finance (for each scenario: FASB and GASB forms, FASB forms only, and GASB forms only), Graduation Rates, Graduation Rates 200, Human Resources, Institutional Characteristics, Outcome Measures, and Student Financial Aid. For Academic Libraries, a committee regularly provides feedback to NCES for improvements and, for Admissions, clarifications were made after discussions with the College Board, which recently changed the SAT Test.
The changes made are listed in the table below; none of the changes are expected to increase institutional burden. The exception is OM, which includes all proposed changes along with approved changes in the blank forms available on the survey materials page. |
Table 4. Proposed Minor Changes to Academic Libraries (AL) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
DELETED FAQ. |
REWORDED FAQ. Are music sheets collected? |
INSTRUCTION CHANGE: Physical Books (include government documents) - Report physical book titles owned or leased by the library if individual titles are cataloged and/or searchable through the library catalog or discovery system. Exclude serials, microforms, maps, nonprint materials, and uncataloged items. Include music scores if searchable by title through the library catalog or discovery system. Include government documents that are accessible through the library''s catalogs regardless of whether they are separately classified and/or shelved. "Cataloged" includes documents for which records are provided by the library or downloaded from other sources into the library catalog or discovery system. |
INSTRUCTION CHANGE: Physical Media – Report the number of titles of media materials. Include microforms, audiovisual materials, cartographic, and graphic materials and three-dimensional artifacts realia. |
INSTRUCTION CHANGE: Total interlibrary loans and documents provided to other libraries – Report the number of filled requests for material provided to other libraries. Include all returnable and non-returnable interlibrary loans and documents. Include direct borrowing between consortium members. Do not include transactions between the main or central library and branches, or transactions between branches. |
NEW FAQ: Our institution now has a Library and Learning Center, instead of a standalone Library, which is comprised of a library, tutoring, a writing center, and computer labs. Should we answer for the entire facility or just the library component? |
NEW FAQ: Where are microfiche and microforms included? How does an institution count microfilm by titles Government Document collections are not in the library catalog or discovery system as individual titles? |
NEW FAQ: If a title is not searchable through the institution''s catalog or discovery system, but is searchable through their link resolver, is this counted in IPEDS? |
NEW FAQ: How should direct borrowing between consortium members be included? |
NEW FAQ: Are proceedings included as an e-book or as an e-serial? |
NEW FAQ: Is ArtStor reported as a database or media? |
NEW FAQ: The instructions state to exclude DDA and PDA collection usage numbers until they have been purchased or leased by the library. How should an institution report usage if DDA and PDA numbers cannot be excluded in a COUNTER report? |
NEW FAQ: What should an institution report if they have platforms with BR1 and MR1 data, as well as, BR2 data? |
NEW FAQ: Ebrary counts every page download as a chapter download. Should an institution report Ebrary counts in COUNTER BR2 data? |
NEW FAQ: Should an institution include usage based collection model items (e.g., evidence-based programs) in e-book usage? |
NEW FAQ: Should expenditures for memberships (e.g., state and national associations) be reported? |
NEW FAQ: How does an institution report digitization expenditures? |
NEW FAQ: Where do we report annual access fees for e-journals or e-books? |
Table 5. Proposed Minor Changes to Admissions (ADM) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
SCREEN CHANGE (2 screens: Selection Process-Test scores and Admissions Information Screen)
|
INSTRUCTION CHANGE (related to Selection Process-Test scores screen): SAT |
SCREEN CHANGE (Admissions Overview screen)
|
Table 6. Proposed Minor Changes to Completions (C) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
INSTRUCTION AND FAQ CHANGE: Postsecondary award, certificate, or diploma of less than 1 academic year: Less than 900 contact or clock hours, or less than 30 semester or trimester credit hours, or less than 45 quarter credit hours) |
INSTRUCTION AND FAQ CHANGE: Postsecondary award, certificate, or diploma of at least 1 but less than 4 academic years: Less than 900 contact or clock hours, or less than 30 semester or trimester credit hours, or less than 45 quarter credit hours |
Table 7. Proposed Minor Changes to Fall Enrollment (EF) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
INSTRUCTION CHANGE: Full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking students in column 1, report undergraduate students who have no prior postsecondary experience and have enrolled full-time with the intent to earn a degree, certificate, or other formal award. The following are also considered first-time: |
GLOSSARY CHANGE: First-time student (undergraduate) - A student who has no prior postsecondary experience (except as noted below) attending any institutions for the first time at the undergraduate level. This includes students enrolled in academic or occupational programs. It also includes students enrolled in the fall term who attended college for the first time in the prior summer term, and students who entered with advance standing (college credits or postsecondary formal award earned before graduation from high school). |
CHANGE FAQ : 1) What is NOT considered "prior postsecondary experience" when reporting first-time students? |
NEW FAQ: How do I report a student who earned a postsecondary award while in high school (a dual enrolled student) and has now graduated high school and enrolled in my institution in the Fall? |
Table 8. Proposed Minor Changes to Finance (F) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
NEW INSTRUCTION (for Expense screens FASB and GASB): Do NOT include O&M expenses in Salaries and Wages, Benefits, Depreciation, Interest, or Other Natural Expenses because O&M expense is reported in its own separate natural classification category. |
REWORDED INSTRUCTION (for General Information Screen, Item #2 (Audit Opinion) for FASB and GASB): |
SCREEN AND INSTRUCTION CHANGE (Part C - Scholarships and Fellowships items 05 and 06 for FASB only): |
SCREEN, INSTRUCTION, AND FAQ CHANGES (Part D, Line 05 for GASB only): |
Table 9. Proposed Minor Changes to Graduation Rates (GR) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
NEW FAQ. Who is considered a "recipient" of a Pell Grant or Subsidized Direct Loan? For the purposes of the GR component, a recipient of a Pell Grant or Subsidized Direct Loan is a student who receives and uses that award within their first year of entry into the institution. |
CHANGES TO SCREENS, INSTRUCTIONS, AND FAQs: Change wording from " |
SCREEN CHANGE (Pell/Direct Loan Screens): Add "(within entering year)" next to each row in the Pell/Direct Loan recipients screen: Recipients of a Pell Grant (within entering year); Recipients of a Direct Subsidized Loan (within entering year) that did not receive a Pell Grant; and Did not receive either a Pell Grant of Direct Subsidized Loan (within entering year) |
Table 10. Proposed Minor Changes to Graduation Rates 200 (GR200) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
REVISED SCREENING QUESTION: Do you have students to report who, 1) received an award between 151% and 200% of normal time to completion or 2) are still enrolled as of 200% of normal time? |
Table 11. Proposed Minor Changes to Human Resources (HR) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
Screen change: Removed |
Table 12. Proposed Minor Changes to Institutional Characteristics (IC) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
INSTRUCTION CHANGE: Distance education |
Table 13. Proposed Minor Changes to Student Financial Aid (SFA) Form |
Changed instruction/FAQ/screen (where applicable; additions in red, deletions with |
NEW FAQ. The SFA survey indicates that the maximum amount of DOD TAP awarded per fiscal year per student is $4500. What do I do if my DOD TAP average is greater than $4500 per student? |
SCREEN CHANGE: Adding Prior Year values to military aid screens. |