Concurrent Session VII Presentations
Thursday, July 18, 2013
1:45 pm – 2:45 pm
VII–B: Improving the Quality of School-Level Finance Data
Stephen Cornman, National Center for Education Statistics
Stephanie Stullich and Heather Rieman, U.S. Department of Education
Peggy O’Guin, California Department of Education)
David Uhlig, Charlottesville City Public Schools (Virginia)
Concerns about the equitable distribution of school funding within school districts have led to
new federal data collections on school-level expenditures. The first of these was for the 2008–09
school year, as required under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), and asked
states to collect and report school-level data on both personnel and nonpersonnel expenditures.
Subsequently, the Office for Civil Rights added a similar data collection to its Civil Rights Data
Collection. Legislation has now been proposed that would change the Title I comparability provision
to require districts to demonstrate that actual expenditures in Title I schools are comparable to
those in non-Title I schools rather than to use proxies, such as student-staff ratios or estimates of
school expenditures based on average teacher salaries.
This panel will discuss the challenges of collecting finance data at the school level; current state and
local practices for tracking and reporting expenditures at the district level and the school level; data
quality issues that are evident in the school-level data collected thus far; and possible strategies for
improving the accuracy and completeness of the data, such as developing standardized protocols
for attributing costs to schools. Particular attention will be paid to the challenges that relate to
collecting school-level data on nonpersonnel expenditures. These issues will be discussed from
the perspectives of local and state fiscal coordinators as well as federal employees.
VII–C: Data Analysis Technical Assistance Community of
Practice in Education (DATA-COPE) Open Session
Dorothyjean Cratty, National Center for Education Statistics
Jared Knowles, Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction
This open session for the broad Data Analysis Community of Practice in Education (DATA-COPE)
will support the exchange of information and resources for state and district education agencies
and their partners. The focus of this exchange is on statistical methods for analyzing administrative
data. This is not a policy or IT discussion session but an “in the weeds” methodological knowledge
utilization session. Some of the areas of interest to the core DATA-COPE user group of state
education agency (SEA) and local education agency (LEA) analysts are growth models, teacher
effects, early warning indicators, student population projections, synthetic datasets, GIS data,
data visualizations, and powerful descriptive analysis.
VII–D: Let's Cross State Lines Without Getting Lost
Jay Pennington, Iowa Department of Education
Kathy Gosa, Kansas State Department of Education
Tom Ogle, Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
The state education agencies of Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska have been working together
to build a foundation for data exchange. This eScholar Interstate ID eXchange project enables
state administrators to locate students who may have continued school in a different state. This
capability will aid in identifying false drop-outs and in more accurately reporting key education
metrics. The panel members will discuss their progress and the technologies being used, including
the Common Education Data Standards Connect tool. In addition, they will address the challenges
encountered for their states, as well as the data policy and data governance issues that arose.
Download Zipped PowerPoint Presentation:
VII–E: Rolling Thunder: Texas’ Methodical Approach to Flipping the Statewide Switch (CANCELLED)
Melody Parrish, Texas Education Agency
Flipping the switch on anything statewide in a state like Texas is a massive undertaking. This session
will cover the phased-approach mindset that has undergirded all aspects of the Texas Student
Data System (TSDS) project. Every aspect of the TSDS project—from technical development and
limited production releases to communications and expectations management to bringing more
than 1,230 districts on board—has benefitted from this methodical and measured approach. Hear
the successes and challenges encountered during the last three years as well as practical tips for
making your next effort more successful.
VII–F: Using Longitudinal Data Through RTI and Data Team Processes to Inform Instruction and Support Services
Louis Cuglietto and Judy Diaz, Port Chester Public Schools (New York)
Mark Samis, Lower Hudson Regional Information Center
Shawn Bay, eScholar LLC
The presenters will discuss the use of longitudinal data to address Response to Intervention on the
ground at John F. Kennedy Magnet School in Port Chester, New York. This presentation will address
one of the pillars of the New York State’s Regents Reform Act regarding Data-Driven Instruction.
Every aspect of the discussion will address the collection and analysis of data to inform instruction
and support services. John F. Kennedy Magnet School is in the band of highest-need schools in
New York and is a 2010 National Blue Ribbon School.
VII–G: Massachusetts' Data Quality Program for Early Childhood Education and School Districtss
Rob Curtin, Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Robb Geier, Public Consulting Group
Massachusetts’ Departments of Early Education and Care (EEC) and Elementary and Secondary
Education (ESE) developed a Data Quality Program to help data collectors and data users
understand and address the issues that may affect the production of high-quality education
data. Participants in this session will learn how two state agencies collaborated to build a unified
program that addressed education from birth through grade 12. This curriculum supports a larger
program of data quality improvement that includes audits, flexible delivery models for training,
tools for implementation monitoring, and individual local education agency support.
Download Zipped PowerPoint Presentation:
VII–H: Massachusetts Early Warning Indicator System: Identifying At-Risk Students Across K–12 Trajectory
Kate Sandel, Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
After the positive response from districts to an early warning indicator provided to ninth graders,
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (MA DESE) created a datadriven
Early Warning Indicator System designed to identify students in first through twelfth grade
who are at risk of missing key educational benchmarks. MA DESE worked closely with American
Institutes for Research to develop statistical models for each grade, leveraging state longitudinal
data systems and using the state’s new P–20 platform to disseminate aggregate and student-level
reports. This session will highlight the development process for this system, challenges addressed,
and current efforts to support district use.
Download Zipped PowerPoint Presentation:
VII–I: Into the Future: Laying the Foundation for an Automated Teacher Licensure System
Matthew Bryant and Patty Pitts, Virginia Department of Education
Rona Jobe, Center for Innovative Technology
Corbin Fauntleroy,CNA Education
The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) is upgrading its teacher licensure data system and
is interested in developing an automated application system. Before developing the system, VDOE
worked with technical and research experts to define the technological and data collection needs
and a phased development process. This presentation will share the project’s results, reflecting
information collected from interviews with other states and literature on the use of electronic
signatures, payment and transcripts, and data elements that could be collected to support
research on teacher preparation and effectiveness. Lastly, the presenters will discuss plans for and
challenges faced in transitioning to automated processes.
Download Zipped PowerPoint Presentation:
VII–J: Integrating A–F School Performance Grading Into a Statewide Longitudinal Data System (SLDS)
William Hurwitch, Maine Department of Education
Manos Stefanakos, Choice Solutions, Inc.
This session will show how Maine leveraged its statewide longitudinal data system data
warehouse when building an A–F school grading system. Stakeholders, including the general
public, can access their school’s grade through balanced scorecards or data tables and drill down
for supporting longitudinal performance data or link to additional reports. The presenters will
discuss the measures, business rules, and roll-out process and how the grading system ties to
college enrollment, remedial course taking, and postsecondary persistence rates.
Download Zipped PowerPoint Presentation:
Top