List of Tables and Figures

Tables

Table 1: Percent of postsecondary education institutions with the stated policy about the proportion of Title IV aid applicants verified for 1993-94 awards, by institutional control
Table 2: Percent of postsecondary education institutions that use guidelines developed by the institution to select additional Title IV aid applicants for verification, and the percent indicating whether those additional applicants are more or less likely to have errors than those selected by the U.S. Department of Education, by institutional control: 1994-95
Table 3: Percent of postsecondary education institutions rating each reason for exercising professional judgment on Pen grant applications for 1993-94 awards as "not at all important" (1) to "very important" (5)
Table 4: Percent of postsecondary education institutions with each approach for reviewing 1993-94 Pell grant applications for the exercise of professional judgment, by institutional control
Table 5: Percent of postsecondary education institutions indicating the extent to which they use professional judgment to reduce the amount of federal student loans to individual students, by institutional control: 1994-95
Table 6: PPercent of postsecondary education institutions indicating the extent to which they use professional judgment to deny federal student loans to individual students, by institutional control: 1994-95
Table 7: Percent of postsecondary education institutions using each of the indicated reasons for using professional judgment to reduce or deny federal student loans to individual students, by institutional control: 1994-95
Table 8: Percent of postsecondary education institutions that participate in the subsidized Stafford loan program, the percent of participating institutions that had increased subsidized Stafford borrowing in 1993-94 compared with 1992-93, and the rank order of reasons for that increased borrowing (ranked first = most important), by institutional control
Table 9: Percent of postsecondary education institutions that participate in the unsubsidized Stafford and SLS loan programs, the percent of participating institutions that had increased unsubsidized Stafford and SLS borrowing in 1993-94 compared with 1992-93, and the rank order of reasons for that increased borrowing (ranked first = most important), by institutional control
Table 10: Percent of postsecondary education institutions that participate in the PLUS loan program, the percent of participating institutions that had increased PLUS borrowing in 1993-94 compared with 1992-93, and the rank order of reasons for that increased borrowing (ranked first = most important), by institutional control
Table 11: Standard errors for the figures and for data not shown in tables

Figures:

Figure 1: Percent of postsecondary education institutions with the stated policy about the proportion of Title IV aid applicants verified for 1992-93 and 1993-94 awards
Figure 2: Percent of postsecondary education institutions indicating the extent to which they believe the law allows the use of professional judgment to adjust federal financial aid awards to maximize access to the institution: 1994-95

Top