Skip Navigation
small header image
Programs at Higher Education Institutions for Disadvantaged Precollege Students
NCES 96230
December 1995

List of Tables and Figures

Tables

  • Table 1: Percent of institutions that had precollegiate programs for disadvantaged students, and the percent of institutions with precollegiate programs where the largest program is Upward Bound, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 1a: Standard errors of the percent of institutions that had precollegiate programs for disadvantaged students, and standard errors of the percent of institutions with precollegiate programs where the largest program is Upward Bound, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 2: Percent of precollegiate students and of total funding that was located within the largest precollegiate program at each institution, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 2a: Standard errors of the percent of precollegiate students and of total funding that was located within the largest precollegiate program at each institution, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 3: Median and total number of precollegiate students served, the institution's faculty and staff, and students who worked with the largest precollegiate program in 1993-94, and the mean student faculty staff ratio, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 3a: Standard errors of the median and total number of precollegiate students, the institution's faculty and staff, and students who worked with the precollegiate program in 1993-94, and the standard errors of the mean student faculty staff ratio, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 4: Primary source of funding for institutions' largest precollegiate program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 4a: Standard errors of the primary source of funding for institutions largest precollegiate program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 5: Percent of institutions ranking selected potential goals of the precollegiate program as the most important goal, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 5a: Standard errors of the percent of institutions ranking selected potential goals of the precollegiate program as the most important goal, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 6: Percent of institutions using various locations as the primary location in which the largest precollegiate program is held, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 6a: Standard errors of the percent of institutions using various locations as the primary location in which the largest precollegiate program is held, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 7: Top goal and the primary location of the largest precollegiate programs: 1994
  • Table 7a: Standard errors of the top goal and the primary location of the largest precollegiate programs: 1994
  • Table 8: Percent of the largest precollegiate programs in 1993-94 with program activities in the academic year only, in the summer only, or in both time periods, and the percent of students in each type of program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 8a: Standard errors of the percent of the largest precollegiate programs in 1993-94 with program activities in the academic year only, in the summer only, or in both time periods, and standard errors of the percent of students in each type of program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 9: Mean number of total hours spent in program activities during the academic year, during the summer, and during both time periods, and the mean number of years a typical precollegiate student continues to participate in the largest precollegiate program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 9a: Standard errors of the mean number of total hours spent in program activities during the academic year, during the summer, and during both time periods, and standard errors of the mean number of years a typical precollegiate student continues to participate in the largest precollegiate program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 10: Percent of precollegiate programs ranking specified qualities among the top three student characteristics for targeting by their precollegiate program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 10a: Standard errors of the percent of precollegiate programs ranking specified qualities among the top three student characteristics for targeting by their precollegiate program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 11: Percent of precollegiate students who are low income and who are female, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 11a: Standard errors of the percent of precollegiate students who are low income and who are female, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 12: Percent of precollegiate students in each racial/ethnic category, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 12a: Standard errors of the percent of precollegiate students in each racial/ethnic category, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 13: Percent of institutions indicating each grade level as the one grade level at which precollegiate students usually enter the program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 13a: Standard errors of the percent of institutions indicating each grade level as the one grade level at which precollegiate students usually enter the program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 14: Percent of precollegiate students at each grade level, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 14a: Standard errors of the percent of precollegiate students at each grade level, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 15: Percent of institutions indicating a particular approach to providing services was the single most frequently used one, by type of approach and institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 15a: Standard errors of the percent of institutions indicating an approach to providing services was the single most frequently used approach, by type of approach and institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 16: Percent of institutions ranking selected services among the three most important in their largest precollegiate program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 16a: Standard errors of the percent of institutions ranking selected services among the three most important in their precollegiate program, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 17: Percent of institutions at which the largest precollegiate program provides one or more financial benefits, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 17a: Standard errors of the percent of institutions at which the largest precollegiate program provides one or more financial benefits, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 18: Percent of institutions providing specific financial benefits among those that offer benefits for successful performance, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 18a: Standard errors of the percent of institutions providing specific financial benefits among those that offer benefits for successful performance, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 19: Number and percent of institutions in the study, and the estimated number and percent in the Nation, by institutional characteristics: 1994
  • Table 20: Estimates and standard errors for figure 2, primary goals of precollegiate programs: 1994
  • Table 21: Estimates and standard errors for figure 3, mean number of hours spent in program activities by precollegiate students: 1994
  • Table 22: Estimates and standard errors for figure 4, most important student characteristics for targeting: 1994
  • Table 23: Estimates and standard errors for figure 6, precollegiate program goals and the year in which students usually start: 1994
  • Table 24: Estimates and standard errors for figure 7, grade ranges served by precollegiate programs: 1994
  • Table 25: Estimates and standard errors for figure 8, most frequently used approaches for providing services in largest precollegiate programs: 1994
  • Table 26: Estimates and standard errors for figure 9, percent of largest precollegiate programs rating selected services as very important: 1994
  • Table 27: Estimates and standard errors for figure 10, percent of largest precollegiate programs ranking selected services as among the three most important: 1994

Figures

  • Figure 1: Largest precollegiate program as a percent of all precollegiate programs at the same institution: 1994
  • Figure 2: Primary goals of precollegiate programs: 1994
  • Figure 3: Mean number of hours spent in program activities by precollegiate students: 1994
  • Figure 4: Most important student characteristics for targeting: 1994
  • Figure 5: Grade in which students typically start participating in precollegiate programs: 1994
  • Figure 6: Precollegiate program goals and the year in which students usually start: 1994
  • Figure 7: Grade ranges served by precollegiate programs: 1994
  • Figure 8: Most frequently used approaches for providing services in largest precollegiate programs: 1994
  • Figure 9: Percent of largest precollegiate programs rating selected services as very important: 1994
  • Figure 10: Percent of largest precollegiate programs ranking selected services as among the three most important: 1994

Top