Skip Navigation
small header image
U.S. Department of Education
Institute of Education Sciences
NCES Kids' Zone
  

Tables

Clicking on a plus sign (+) will display the contents of a publication. Clicking on "Show All" will open all sections and sub-sections, including all tables. Click on the minus sign (-) or "Hide All" to close sections.

  • New Table 2010181: Undergraduate Financial Aid Estimates for Six States: 2007-08Show All
    • Full PDF PDF File (633KB)
    • Introduction
    • Individual Tables

        United States:
      • Table 1.0: Percentage distribution of undergraduates enrolled at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, by selected student characteristics and institution type: United States, California, Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota, New York, and Texas 2007–08
      • Table 1.1: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, average price of attendance, percentage receiving any aid, and average amount of total aid received, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.2: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any grants, percentage receiving any student loans, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.3: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any federal grants, percentage receiving any state grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.4: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving institutional grants, percentage receiving other grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.5: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any need-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.6: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants from state or institutional sources, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.7: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who took out any federal loans; percentage who took out any private student loans, with average amounts borrowed; and percentage of students who ever took out any student loans, with cumulative amount borrowed to date; by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.8: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, percentage with zero net tuition after grants, and average amount of net tuition after grants, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.9: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average net price after grants, and average net price after total aid received, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.10: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average federal expected family contribution (EFC), percentage with financial need, and average amount of need, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.11: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage with financial need and average amount of need, percentage with remaining need after grants and average amount of remaining need, and percentage with remaining need after total aid and average amount of remaining need, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08
      • Table 1.12: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who worked while enrolled, percentage who worked full time while enrolled, average number of hours worked per week, average amount earned while enrolled, percentage who had work-study jobs and average amount of work-study earnings received, by student characteristics: United States 2007–08


        • California:
      • Table 2.1: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, average price of attendance, percentage receiving any aid, and average amount of total aid received, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.2: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any grants, percentage receiving any student loans, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.3: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any federal grants, percentage receiving any state grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.4: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving institutional grants, percentage receiving other grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.5: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any need-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.6: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants from state or institutional sources, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.7: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who took out any federal loans; percentage who took out any private student loans, with average amounts borrowed; and percentage of students who ever took out any student loans, with cumulative amount borrowed to date; by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.8: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, percentage with zero net tuition after grants, and average amount of net tuition after grants, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.9: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average net price after grants, and average net price after total aid received, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.10: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average federal expected family contribution (EFC), percentage with financial need, and average amount of need, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.11: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage with financial need and average amount of need, percentage with remaining need after grants and average amount of remaining need, and percentage with remaining need after total aid and average amount of remaining need, by student characteristics: California 2007–08
      • Table 2.12: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who worked while enrolled, percentage who worked full time while enrolled, average number of hours worked per week, average amount earned while enrolled, percentage who had work-study jobs and average amount of work-study earnings received, by student characteristics: California 2007–08


        • Georgia:
      • Table 3.1: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, average price of attendance, percentage receiving any aid, and average amount of total aid received, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.2: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any grants, percentage receiving any student loans, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.3: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any federal grants, percentage receiving any state grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.4: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving institutional grants, percentage receiving other grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.5: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any need-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.6: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants from state or institutional sources, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.7: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who took out any federal loans; percentage who took out any private student loans, with average amounts borrowed; and percentage of students who ever took out any student loans, with cumulative amount borrowed to date; by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.8: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, percentage with zero net tuition after grants, and average amount of net tuition after grants, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.9: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average net price after grants, and average net price after total aid received, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.10: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average federal expected family contribution (EFC), percentage with financial need, and average amount of need, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.11: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage with financial need and average amount of need, percentage with remaining need after grants and average amount of remaining need, and percentage with remaining need after total aid and average amount of remaining need, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08
      • Table 3.12: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who worked while enrolled, percentage who worked full time while enrolled, average number of hours worked per week, average amount earned while enrolled, percentage who had work-study jobs and average amount of work-study earnings received, by student characteristics: Georgia 2007–08


        • Illinois:
      • Table 4.1: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, average price of attendance, percentage receiving any aid, and average amount of total aid received, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.2: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any grants, percentage receiving any student loans, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.3: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any federal grants, percentage receiving any state grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.4: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving institutional grants, percentage receiving other grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.5: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any need-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.6: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants from state or institutional sources, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.7: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who took out any federal loans; percentage who took out any private student loans, with average amounts borrowed; and percentage of students who ever took out any student loans, with cumulative amount borrowed to date; by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.8: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, percentage with zero net tuition after grants, and average amount of net tuition after grants, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.9: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average net price after grants, and average net price after total aid received, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.10: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average federal expected family contribution (EFC), percentage with financial need, and average amount of need, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.11: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage with financial need and average amount of need, percentage with remaining need after grants and average amount of remaining need, and percentage with remaining need after total aid and average amount of remaining need, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08
      • Table 4.12: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who worked while enrolled, percentage who worked full time while enrolled, average number of hours worked per week, average amount earned while enrolled, percentage who had work-study jobs and average amount of work-study earnings received, by student characteristics: Illinois 2007–08


        • Minnesota:
      • Table 5.1: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, average price of attendance, percentage receiving any aid, and average amount of total aid received, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.2: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any grants, percentage receiving any student loans, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.3: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any federal grants, percentage receiving any state grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.4: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving institutional grants, percentage receiving other grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.5: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any need-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.6: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants from state or institutional sources, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.7: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who took out any federal loans; percentage who took out any private student loans, with average amounts borrowed; and percentage of students who ever took out any student loans, with cumulative amount borrowed to date; by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.8: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, percentage with zero net tuition after grants, and average amount of net tuition after grants, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.9: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average net price after grants, and average net price after total aid received, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.10: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average federal expected family contribution (EFC), percentage with financial need, and average amount of need, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.11: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage with financial need and average amount of need, percentage with remaining need after grants and average amount of remaining need, and percentage with remaining need after total aid and average amount of remaining need, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08
      • Table 5.12: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who worked while enrolled, percentage who worked full time while enrolled, average number of hours worked per week, average amount earned while enrolled, percentage who had work-study jobs and average amount of work-study earnings received, by student characteristics: Minnesota 2007–08


        • New York:
      • Table 6.1: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, average price of attendance, percentage receiving any aid, and average amount of total aid received, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.2: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any grants, percentage receiving any student loans, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.3: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any federal grants, percentage receiving any state grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.4: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving institutional grants, percentage receiving other grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.5: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any need-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.6: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants from state or institutional sources, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.7: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who took out any federal loans; percentage who took out any private student loans, with average amounts borrowed; and percentage of students who ever took out any student loans, with cumulative amount borrowed to date; by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.8: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, percentage with zero net tuition after grants, and average amount of net tuition after grants, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.9: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average net price after grants, and average net price after total aid received, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.10: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average federal expected family contribution (EFC), percentage with financial need, and average amount of need, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.11: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage with financial need and average amount of need, percentage with remaining need after grants and average amount of remaining need, and percentage with remaining need after total aid and average amount of remaining need, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08
      • Table 6.12: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who worked while enrolled, percentage who worked full time while enrolled, average number of hours worked per week, average amount earned while enrolled, percentage who had work-study jobs and average amount of work-study earnings received, by student characteristics: New York 2007–08


        • Texas:
      • Table 7.1: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, average price of attendance, percentage receiving any aid, and average amount of total aid received, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.2: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any grants, percentage receiving any student loans, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.3: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any federal grants, percentage receiving any state grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.4: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving institutional grants, percentage receiving other grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.5: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any need-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.6: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage receiving any merit-based grants, percentage receiving any merit-based grants from state or institutional sources, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.7: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who took out any federal loans; percentage who took out any private student loans, with average amounts borrowed; and percentage of students who ever took out any student loans, with cumulative amount borrowed to date; by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.8: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average tuition and fees, percentage with zero net tuition after grants, and average amount of net tuition after grants, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.9: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average net price after grants, and average net price after total aid received, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.10: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, average price of attendance, average federal expected family contribution (EFC), percentage with financial need, and average amount of need, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.11: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage with financial need and average amount of need, percentage with remaining need after grants and average amount of remaining need, and percentage with remaining need after total aid and average amount of remaining need, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
      • Table 7.12: Among in-state undergraduates at public 2-year, public 4-year, private not-for-profit 4-year, and private for-profit degree-granting institutions, percentage who worked while enrolled, percentage who worked full time while enrolled, average number of hours worked per week, average amount earned while enrolled, percentage who had work-study jobs and average amount of work-study earnings received, by student characteristics: Texas 2007–08
    • Glossary
    • Technical Notes
  • 2009186: Choosing a Postsecondary Institution: Considerations Reported by StudentsShow All
    • Full PDF PDF File (245KB)
    • Introduction
    • Individual Tables
      • Table 1: Percentage distribution of 2003–04 beginning postsecondary students who were recent high school graduates (graduated in 2003 or 2004) and not recent high school graduates (graduated prior to 2003), by type of institution: 2004–06
      • Table 2: Percentage distribution of 2003–04 beginning postsecondary students who were recent high school graduates, by type of institution and student characteristics: 2004–06
      • Table 3: Percentage of 2003–04 beginning postsecondary students who were recent high school graduates, by type of institution and enrollment choice factors: 2004–06
      • Table 4: Percentage distribution of 2003–04 beginning postsecondary students who were not recent high school graduates, by type of institution and student characteristics: 2004–06
      • Table 5: Percentage of 2003–04 beginning postsecondary students who were not recent high school graduates, by type of institution and enrollment choice factors: 2004–06
    • Glossary
    • Technical Notes
  • 2009201: Undergraduate Financial Aid Estimates by Type of Institution in 2007–08Show All
    • Full PDF PDF File (264KB)
    • Introduction
    • Individual Tables
      • Table 1: Average tuition and fees, average total price of attendance, and percentage of undergraduates receiving any aid, any grants, or any student loans and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 2: Percentage of undergraduates receiving grants from federal, state, institutional, or other sources and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 3: Percentage distribution of undergraduates receiving various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 4: Average total amount of financial aid that undergraduates received in various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 5: Average tuition and fees, average total price of attendance, and percentage of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any student loans and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 6: Percentage of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions receiving grants from federal, state, institutional, or other sources and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 7: Percentage distribution of undergraduates in public 4-year institutions receiving various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 8: Average total amount of financial aid that undergraduates in public 4-year institutions received in various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 9: Average tuition and fees, average total price of attendance, and percentage of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any student loans and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 10: Percentage of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions receiving grants from federal, state, institutional, or other sources, and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 11: Percentage distribution of undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions receiving various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 12: Average total amount of financial aid that undergraduates in private not-for-profit 4-year institutions received in various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 13: Average tuition and fees, average total price of attendance, and percentage of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any student loans and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 14: Percentage of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions receiving grants from federal, state, institutional, or other sources and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 15: Percentage distribution of undergraduates in public 2-year institutions receiving various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 16: Average total amount of financial aid that undergraduates in public 2-year institutions received in various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 17: Average tuition and fees, average total price of attendance, and percentage of undergraduates in private for-profit institutions receiving any aid, any grants, or any student loans and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 18: Percentage of undergraduates in private for-profit institutions receiving grants from federal, state, institutional, or other sources and average amounts received, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 19: Percentage distribution of undergraduates in private for-profit institutions receiving various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table 20: Average total amount of financial aid that undergraduates in private for-profit institutions received in various types of financial aid packages, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table A-1: Percentage distribution of undergraduates attending various types of institutions, by student characteristics: 2007–08
      • Table A-2: Percentage distribution of undergraduates by student characteristics, within type of institution: 2007–08
    • Glossary
    • Technical Notes
  • 2009182: A Profile of Military Servicemembers and Veterans Enrolled in Postsecondary Education in 2007–08Show All
    • Full PDF PDF File (308KB)
    • Introduction
    • Individual Tables
      • Table 1: Percentage distribution of undergraduates, by military status and receipt of veterans’ educational benefits
      • Table 2: Percentage distribution of undergraduates, by military status, receipt of veterans’ education benefits, dependency status, and selected demographic characteristics
      • Table 3: Percentage distribution of undergraduates, by military status, receipt of veterans’ education benefits, dependency status, and selected enrollment characteristics
      • Table 4: Percentage of first-time beginning undergraduates, by military status, dependency status, and selected considerations in and reasons for attending their institutions
      • Table 5: Percentage receiving financial aid and average amount received among undergraduates attending public 2-year institutions, by military status, dependency status, institution type, and type of aid
    • Glossary
    • Technical Notes

Pubs/Products|Surveys/Programs|DataTools|Tables/Figures|FastFacts|School/LibrarySearch|Annuals|What's New|Kids Zone
|Institute of Education Sciences|NCER|NCEE|NCSER
  
1990 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006, USA
Phone: (202) 502-7300 (map)
Statistical Standards|FedStats.gov