Country |
2003 |
|
2006 |
|
2009 |
Score |
s.e. |
|
Score |
s.e. |
|
Score |
s.e. |
OECD trend score1 |
500 |
0.6 |
|
498 |
0.5 |
|
499 |
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OECD countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia |
524 |
2.1 |
|
520 |
2.2 |
|
514 |
2.5 |
Austria |
506 |
3.3 |
|
505 |
3.7 |
|
496 |
2.7 |
Belgium |
529 |
2.3 |
|
520 |
3.0 |
|
515 |
2.3 |
Canada |
532 |
1.8 |
|
527 |
2.0 |
|
527 |
1.6 |
Chile |
― |
† |
|
411 |
4.6 |
|
421 |
3.1 |
Czech Republic |
516 |
3.6 |
|
510 |
3.6 |
|
493 |
2.8 |
Denmark |
514 |
2.7 |
|
513 |
2.6 |
|
503 |
2.6 |
Estonia |
― |
† |
|
515 |
2.7 |
|
512 |
2.6 |
Finland |
544 |
1.9 |
|
548 |
2.3 |
|
541 |
2.2 |
France |
511 |
2.5 |
|
496 |
3.2 |
|
497 |
3.1 |
Germany |
503 |
3.3 |
|
504 |
3.9 |
|
513 |
2.9 |
Greece |
445 |
3.9 |
|
459 |
3.0 |
|
466 |
3.9 |
Hungary |
490 |
2.8 |
|
491 |
2.9 |
|
490 |
3.5 |
Iceland |
515 |
1.4 |
|
506 |
1.8 |
|
507 |
1.4 |
Ireland |
503 |
2.4 |
|
501 |
2.8 |
|
487 |
2.5 |
Israel |
― |
† |
|
442 |
4.3 |
|
447 |
3.3 |
Italy |
466 |
3.1 |
|
462 |
2.3 |
|
483 |
1.9 |
Japan |
534 |
4.0 |
|
523 |
3.3 |
|
529 |
3.3 |
Korea, Republic of |
542 |
3.2 |
|
547 |
3.8 |
|
546 |
4.0 |
Luxembourg |
493 |
1.0 |
|
490 |
1.1 |
|
489 |
1.2 |
Mexico |
385 |
3.6 |
|
406 |
2.9 |
|
419 |
1.8 |
Netherlands |
538 |
3.1 |
|
531 |
2.6 |
|
526 |
4.7 |
New Zealand |
523 |
2.3 |
|
522 |
2.4 |
|
519 |
2.3 |
Norway |
495 |
2.4 |
|
490 |
2.6 |
|
498 |
2.4 |
Poland |
490 |
2.5 |
|
495 |
2.4 |
|
495 |
2.8 |
Portugal |
466 |
3.4 |
|
466 |
3.1 |
|
487 |
2.9 |
Slovak Republic |
498 |
3.3 |
|
492 |
2.8 |
|
497 |
3.1 |
Slovenia |
― |
† |
|
504 |
1.0 |
|
501 |
1.2 |
Spain |
485 |
2.4 |
|
480 |
2.3 |
|
483 |
2.1 |
Sweden |
509 |
2.6 |
|
502 |
2.4 |
|
494 |
2.9 |
Switzerland |
527 |
3.4 |
|
530 |
3.2 |
|
534 |
3.3 |
Turkey |
423 |
6.7 |
|
424 |
4.9 |
|
445 |
4.4 |
United Kingdom2 |
― |
† |
|
495 |
2.1 |
|
492 |
2.4 |
United States |
483 |
2.9 |
|
474 |
4.0 |
|
487 |
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-OECD countries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albania |
― |
† |
|
― |
† |
|
377 |
4.0 |
Argentina |
― |
† |
|
381 |
6.2 |
|
388 |
4.1 |
Azerbaijan |
― |
† |
|
476 |
2.3 |
|
431 |
2.8 |
Brazil |
356 |
4.8 |
|
370 |
2.9 |
|
386 |
2.4 |
Bulgaria |
― |
† |
|
413 |
6.1 |
|
428 |
5.9 |
Chinese Taipei |
― |
† |
|
549 |
4.1 |
|
543 |
3.4 |
Colombia |
― |
† |
|
370 |
3.8 |
|
381 |
3.2 |
Croatia |
― |
† |
|
467 |
2.4 |
|
460 |
3.1 |
Dubai-UAE |
― |
† |
|
― |
† |
|
453 |
1.1 |
Hong Kong-China |
550 |
4.5 |
|
547 |
2.7 |
|
555 |
2.7 |
Indonesia |
360 |
3.9 |
|
391 |
5.6 |
|
371 |
3.7 |
Jordan |
― |
† |
|
384 |
3.3 |
|
387 |
3.7 |
Kazakhstan |
― |
† |
|
― |
† |
|
405 |
3.0 |
Kyrgyz Republic |
― |
† |
|
311 |
3.4 |
|
331 |
2.9 |
Latvia |
483 |
3.7 |
|
486 |
3.0 |
|
482 |
3.1 |
Liechtenstein |
536 |
4.1 |
|
525 |
4.2 |
|
536 |
4.1 |
Lithuania |
― |
† |
|
486 |
2.9 |
|
477 |
2.6 |
Macao-China |
527 |
2.9 |
|
525 |
1.3 |
|
525 |
0.9 |
Montenegro, Republic of3 |
437 |
3.8 |
|
399 |
1.4 |
|
403 |
2.0 |
Panama |
― |
† |
|
― |
† |
|
360 |
5.2 |
Peru |
― |
† |
|
― |
† |
|
365 |
4.0 |
Qatar |
― |
† |
|
318 |
1 |
|
368 |
0.7 |
Romania |
― |
† |
|
415 |
4.2 |
|
427 |
3.4 |
Russian Federation |
468 |
4.2 |
|
476 |
3.9 |
|
468 |
3.3 |
Serbia, Republic of3 |
437 |
3.8 |
|
435 |
3.5 |
|
442 |
2.9 |
Shanghai-China |
― |
† |
|
― |
† |
|
600 |
2.8 |
Singapore |
― |
† |
|
― |
† |
|
562 |
1.4 |
Thailand |
417 |
3.0 |
|
417 |
2.3 |
|
419 |
3.2 |
Trinidad and Tobago |
― |
† |
|
― |
† |
|
414 |
1.3 |
Tunisia |
359 |
2.5 |
|
365 |
4.0 |
|
371 |
3.0 |
Uruguay |
422 |
3.3 |
|
427 |
2.6 |
|
427 |
2.6 |
― Not available. |
† Not applicable. |
1 The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) trend scores are based on the averages of the 29 countries that participated in both the 2003 and 2009 assessments, met all technical standards, and that are currently members of the OECD. The five current OECD members not included in the OECD averages used to report on trends in mathematics literacy include Chile, Estonia, Israel, and Slovenia, which did participate in 2003; and the United Kingdom, which did not meet Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) standards for the 2003 assessment. |
2 Because of low response rates, 2003 data for the United Kingdom are not presented. |
3 The Republics of Montenegro and Serbia were a united country under the PISA 2003 assessment. |
NOTE: The PISA mathematics framework was revised in 2003. Because of changes in the framework, it is not possible to compare mathematics learning outcomes from PISA 2000 with those from PISA 2003, 2006, and 2009. Because PISA is principally an OECD study, the results for non-OECD countries are displayed separately from those of the OECD countries and are not included in the OECD average. Scores are reported on a scale from 0 to 1,000. Standard error is noted by s.e. In the country column, italics indicate non-national entities. UAE refers to United Arab Emirates. |
SOURCE: Fleischman, H.L., Hopstock, P. J., Pelczar, M.P, and Shelly, B.E. (2010). Highlights From PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-Year-Old Students in Reading, Mathematics, and Science Literacy in an International Context (NCES 2011-004), supplemental table M2. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. |