Return | Download Excel (56 KB) |
Table B.1.04. | IEA: Percentage of fourth-grade students reaching the PIRLS 2006 international benchmarks in reading literacy, by jursidiction: 2006 |
Jurisdiction | Advanced (625) |
High (550) |
Intermediate (475) |
Low (400) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Percent | s.e. | Percent | s.e. | Percent | s.e. | Percent | s.e. | ||||||||
International average | 9 | 0.2 | 40 | 0.3 | 74 | 0.3 | 90 | 0.2 | |||||||
Austria | 8 | 0.9 | 45 | 1.5 | 84 | 1.1 | 98 | 0.4 | |||||||
Belgium (Flemish)1,2 | 7 | 0.6 | 49 | 1.5 | 90 | 0.9 | 99 | 0.2 | |||||||
Belgium (French) | 3 | 0.4 | 23 | 1.3 | 66 | 1.6 | 92 | 0.7 | |||||||
Bulgaria1 | 16 | 1.4 | 52 | 2.3 | 82 | 1.8 | 95 | 1.0 | |||||||
Canada, British Columbia1 | 16 | 1.3 | 56 | 1.6 | 88 | 1.0 | 98 | 0.3 | |||||||
Canada, Nova Scotia | 13 | 1.0 | 48 | 1.2 | 82 | 1.0 | 96 | 0.4 | |||||||
Canada, Ontario1 | 16 | 1.1 | 54 | 1.9 | 87 | 1.1 | 98 | 0.5 | |||||||
Canada, Quebec | 6 | 0.8 | 41 | 1.9 | 83 | 1.3 | 97 | 0.4 | |||||||
Chinese Taipei | 7 | 0.7 | 43 | 1.3 | 84 | 1.0 | 97 | 0.4 | |||||||
Denmark | 11 | 0.8 | 52 | 1.4 | 85 | 1.0 | 97 | 0.4 | |||||||
England | 15 | 0.9 | 48 | 1.3 | 78 | 1.1 | 93 | 0.7 | |||||||
France | 5 | 0.6 | 35 | 1.2 | 76 | 1.2 | 96 | 0.4 | |||||||
Georgia1 | 1 | ! | 0.4 | 15 | 1.3 | 50 | 1.8 | 82 | 1.3 | ||||||
Germany | 11 | 0.9 | 52 | 1.6 | 87 | 0.8 | 97 | 0.3 | |||||||
Hong Kong SAR3 | 15 | 1.0 | 62 | 1.6 | 92 | 0.8 | 99 | 0.2 | |||||||
Hungary | 14 | 0.9 | 53 | 1.8 | 86 | 1.4 | 97 | 0.5 | |||||||
Iceland | 3 | 0.4 | 29 | 1.1 | 72 | 0.8 | 93 | 0.8 | |||||||
Indonesia | # | † | 2 | 0.3 | 19 | 1.6 | 54 | 2.1 | |||||||
Iran, Islamic Rep. of | 1 | 0.2 | 8 | 0.7 | 30 | 1.3 | 60 | 1.6 | |||||||
Israel4 | 10 | 1.0 | 40 | 1.3 | 70 | 1.3 | 85 | 1.2 | |||||||
Italy | 14 | 1.4 | 52 | 1.8 | 87 | 1.3 | 98 | 0.4 | |||||||
Kuwait | # | † | 2 | 0.3 | 10 | 0.8 | 28 | 1.2 | |||||||
Latvia | 8 | 0.8 | 46 | 1.5 | 86 | 1.2 | 98 | 0.4 | |||||||
Lithuania | 5 | 0.8 | 43 | 1.3 | 86 | 0.9 | 99 | 0.3 | |||||||
Luxembourg | 15 | 0.6 | 56 | 0.8 | 89 | 0.5 | 99 | 0.2 | |||||||
Macedonia, Rep. of | 2 | 0.4 | 15 | 1.1 | 40 | 1.7 | 66 | 1.6 | |||||||
Moldova, Rep. of | 3 | 0.4 | 23 | 1.5 | 67 | 1.9 | 91 | 0.9 | |||||||
Morocco | # | † | 1 | ! | 0.4 | 9 | 1.2 | 26 | 2.0 | ||||||
Netherlands2 | 6 | 0.5 | 49 | 1.2 | 91 | 0.8 | 99 | 0.2 | |||||||
New Zealand | 13 | 0.7 | 45 | 1.0 | 76 | 1.0 | 92 | 0.6 | |||||||
Norway5 | 2 | 0.3 | 22 | 1.1 | 67 | 1.6 | 92 | 0.8 | |||||||
Poland | 7 | 0.5 | 36 | 1.2 | 73 | 1.1 | 93 | 0.7 | |||||||
Qatar | # | † | 1 | 0.2 | 11 | 0.4 | 33 | 0.7 | |||||||
Romania | 4 | 0.5 | 27 | 1.6 | 61 | 2.2 | 84 | 1.8 | |||||||
Russian Federation1 | 19 | 1.5 | 61 | 2.0 | 90 | 1.1 | 98 | 0.5 | |||||||
Scotland2 | 10 | 0.8 | 40 | 1.4 | 77 | 1.4 | 93 | 0.8 | |||||||
Singapore | 19 | 1.4 | 58 | 1.7 | 86 | 1.0 | 97 | 0.4 | |||||||
Slovak Republic | 8 | 0.6 | 43 | 1.5 | 80 | 1.3 | 94 | 0.9 | |||||||
Slovenia | 6 | 0.6 | 37 | 1.2 | 76 | 1.1 | 94 | 0.5 | |||||||
South Africa | 2 | 0.4 | 6 | 0.9 | 13 | 1.4 | 22 | 1.6 | |||||||
Spain | 5 | 0.5 | 31 | 1.3 | 72 | 1.3 | 94 | 0.8 | |||||||
Sweden | 11 | 0.9 | 53 | 1.5 | 88 | 1.0 | 98 | 0.4 | |||||||
Trinidad and Tobago | 2 | 0.5 | 13 | 1.2 | 38 | 1.7 | 64 | 2.0 | |||||||
United States1,2 | 12 | 1.2 | 47 | 2.0 | 82 | 1.4 | 96 | 0.6 | |||||||
† Not applicable. | |||||||||||||||
# Rounds to zero. | |||||||||||||||
! Interpret data with caution. (Estimates are unstable.) | |||||||||||||||
1 National Defined Population covers less than 95 percent of the National Target Population. | |||||||||||||||
2 Met guidelines for sample participation rates only after substitute schools were included. | |||||||||||||||
3 Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China. | |||||||||||||||
4 National Defined Population covers less than 80 percent of the National Target Population. | |||||||||||||||
5 Nearly satisfied guidelines for sample participation rates after replacement schools were included. | |||||||||||||||
NOTE: The International average does not include the results from the Canadian provinces. Average reading literacy scores are reported on a scale of 0 to 1,000. Benchmarks refer to the percentage of students who reached each cutpoint score along the scale (400, 475, 550, 625). For benchmark definitions and methodology see Mullis et al. (2007). Apparent differences may not be statistically significant. Standard error is noted by s.e. | |||||||||||||||
SOURCE: Data from the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS), 2006. Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M., and Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 International Report, exhibit 2.1. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College (42MB). |