Skip Navigation
small NCES header image
Office for Civil Rights Survey Redesign: A Feasibility Survey
NCES: 92130
September 1992

Tables of Estimates and Standard Errors

  • Table 2a and Table 2a Continued: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts administering various disciplinary actions and standard errors of the percentage able to provide information on these actions by various student classifications, by district characteristics: United States, 1991-92
     
  • Table 3a and Table 3a Continued: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts indicating their ease in reporting the frequency (number of times) each disciplinary action was taken and the unduplicated count of students disciplined, by district characteristics: United States, 1991-92
     
  • Table 4a and Table 4a Continued: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts offering various academic programs and standard errors of the percentage able to report enrollment in these programs by various student classifications, by district characteristics: United States, 1991-92
     
  • Table 5a: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts indicating that they classify biracial/bi-ethnic students on records for their own purposes in various ways, by district characteristics: United States, 1991-92
     
  • Table 6a: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts that provide information on special populations, by district characteristics: United States, 1991-92
     
  • Table 7a: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts that have an automated, integrated student record system, by district characteristics: United States, 1991-92
     
  • Table 8a: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts indicating that they currently maintain various types of individual student information on automated systems or paper files: United States,1991-92
     
  • Table 9a: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts indicating that they currently maintain various types of individual student information on automated systems, by district characteristics: United States, 1991-92
     
  • Table 10a: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts preferring various methods of providing data currently reported on OCR E&S Survey forms ED101 and ED102. by district characteristics: United States, 1991-92
     
  • Table 11a: Standard errors of the percentage of public school districts requiring various kinds of assistance in order to report OCR information on diskettes or other automated means, by district characteristics: United States, 1991-92


Top


Would you like to help us improve our products and website by taking a short survey?

YES, I would like to take the survey

or

No Thanks

The survey consists of a few short questions and takes less than one minute to complete.