Appendix B. Tables of Standard Errors

• Table 1: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, by district characteristics: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 2: Total number of public alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, number of students enrolled, and number of specific types: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 3: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, grouped by number of schools and/or programs per district, by district characteristics: Academic year 1999-2000
   
• Table 4: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, grouped by percent of students enrolled as of October 1, 2000, by district characteristics: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 5: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, grouped by percent of students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) in these schools and programs as of October 1, 2000, by district characteristics: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 6: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that were unable to enroll new students in an alternative school or program, by district characteristics: Academic year 1999-2000
   
• Table 7: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that employed various procedures when demand for enrollment exceeded available capacity within the last 3 years, by district characteristics: Academic years 1998-2001
   
• Table 8: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that reported that students could be transferred to an alternative school or program solely on the basis of various reasons, by district characteristics: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 9: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that reported the extent to which various means influence the placement of special education students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) in alternative schools and programs: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 10: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that reported a policy that allows all, some, or no students enrolled to return to a regular school, by district characteristics: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 11: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that cited various reasons as "very important" in determining whether an enrolled student can return to a regular school, by district characteristics: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 12: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that used various practices for hiring alternative school and program teachers, by district characteristics: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 13: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that reported various required services or practices be made routinely available to enrolled students, by district characteristics: Academic year 2000-01
   
• Table 14: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that collaborated with various agencies in order to provide services for enrolled students, by district characteristics: Academic year 2000-01 Standard errors for figures and for data not shown in tables: Academic years 1999-2001

Top