List of Tables and Figures

Tables:

• Table 1: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for students by district characteristics. Academic year 2000-01

• Table 2: Total number of public alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, number of students enrolled, and number of specific types Academic year 2000-01

• Table 3: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, grouped by number of schools and/or programs per district, by district characteristics Academic year 1999-2000

• Table 4: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, grouped by percent of students enrolled as of October 1, 2000, by district characteristics Academic year 2000-01

• Table 5: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, grouped by percent of students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) in these schools and programs as of October 1, 2000, by district characteristics Academic year 2000-01

• Table 6: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that were unable to enroll new students in an alternative school or program, by district characteristics Academic year 1999-2000

• Table 7: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that employed various procedures when demand for enrollment exceeded available capacity within the last 3 years, by district characteristics Academic years 1998-99 to 2000-01

• Table 8: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that reported that students could be transferred to an alternative school or program solely on the basis of various reasons , by district characteristics Academic year 2000-01

• Table 9: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that reported the extent to which various means influence the placement of special education students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) in alternative schools and programs Academic year 2000-01

• Table 10: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that reported a policy that allows all, some, or no students enrolled to return to a regular school, by district characteristics Academic year 2000-01

• Table 11: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that cited various reasons as very important in determining whether an enrolled student can return to a regular school, by district characteristics Academic year 2000-01

• Table 12: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that used various practices for hiring alternative school and program teachers, by district characteristics Academic year 2000-01

• Table 13: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that reported various required services or practices be made routinely available to enrolled students, by district characteristics academic year 2000-01

• Table 14: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that collaborated with various agencies in order to provide services for enrolled students, by district characteristics Academic year 2000-01

Figures:

• Figure 1: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students that offered alternative schools and programs for prekindergarten through grade 12 Academic year 2000-01

• Figure 2: Percent of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students where new enrollment needs exceeded available capacity between the months of August 1999 and June 2000, by month: Academic year 1999-2000

• Figure 3: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students,grouped by the number of various services or practices made routinely available to enrolled students Academic year 2000-01

• Figure 4: Percentage distribution of districts with alternative schools and programs for at-risk students, grouped by the number of various agencies the district reported collaborating with to provide services to enrolled student

Top