Skip Navigation
small NCES header image

Table Library

The tables shown here complement those included in the publications that have been published using the ELS:2002 data. Additional tables will be added to ELS:2002 Table Library periodically.

The tables are all produced using the ELS:2002/06 second follow-up data file, which is available in public-use form using EDAT and in restricted-use form through obtaining a restricted-use license. The ELS Variable List lists all the variables available in all of the ELS data files.

Suggestions from users on tables to include in this “Tables” section of the ELS:2002 website are welcome.

Clicking on a plus sign (+) will display the contents of a publication. Clicking on "Show All" will open all sections and sub-sections, including all tables. Click on the minus sign (-) or "Hide All" to close sections.
indicates a recently added or modified table.


  • AP/IB prevalence and availability: Offerings in schools, and coursetaking and exam taking by students, 2002 and 2009
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Subject distribution of AP exam taking by 2003–2004 high school seniors
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Selectivity of the first postsecondary institution attended and exam subjects taken by 2003–2004 high school seniors
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Characteristics of 2003-2004 high school graduates who took AP exams in 2003–2004, by exam subject
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Percent of high schools offering Advanced Placement (AP) courses, by distribution of students at the school enrolled in AP courses and school urbanicity: 2009
    • Tables/Figures Table 5. Percent of high schools offering International Baccalaureate (IB) programs, by school urbanicity: 2009
    • Tables/Figures Table 6. Percent of high schools offering Advanced Placement (AP) programs on site, by school urbanicity: 2009
  • Career Academies available in high schools, 2002 and 2009
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Percent of high schools offering career academy courses, by school urbanicity: 2002
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Weighted frequencies of high schools offering career academy courses, by school urbanicity: 2002
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Percent of high schools offering Career Clusters, by school urbanicity: 2009
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Weighted frequencies of high schools offering Career Clusters, by school urbanicity: 2009
  • New Table ListingCareer and Technical Education (CTE) in high school, outcomes by 2012
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Percentage distribution of postsecondary attendance of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Concentrators compared to Non-Concentrators among 2003-04 public high school graduates, by attainment status (2012)
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Percentage distribution of postsecondary degree attainment of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Concentrators compared to Non-Concentrators among 2003-04 public high school graduates, by institution level (2012)
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Percentage distribution of postsecondary degree attainment of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Concentrators compared to Non-Concentrators among 2003-04 public high school graduates, by degree or credential type (2012)
    • Tables/Figures Table 4a. Average hourly wages and postsecondary degree attainment of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Concentrators compared to Non-Concentrators among 2003-04 public high school graduates, by degree type (2012)
    • Tables/Figures Table 4b. Average hourly wages of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Concentrators who were 2003-04 public high school graduates, by specific area of CTE concentration while in high school and postsecondary degree attainment (2012)
    • Tables/Figures Table 5a. Average hourly wages of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Concentrators compared to Non-Concentrators among 2003-04 public high school graduates, by degree or credential type (2012)
    • Tables/Figures Table 5b. Average hourly wages of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Concentrators who were 2003-04 public high school graduates, by specific area of CTE concentration while in high school and type of postsecondary degree or credential received (2012)
    • Tables/Figures Table 6. Percentage of CTE graduates who enroll in postsecondary education, by field of concentration in high school (2012)
    • Tables/Figures Table 7. Percentage of CTE graduates whose 2012 occupation is in the same field as their high school area of CTE concentration (2012)
    • Tables/Figures Table 8. Percentage of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Concentrators compared to Non-Concentrators among 2003-04 public high school graduates, by employment status (2012)
  • New Table Listing Employment and hours worked, 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores, by enrollment in postsecondary institutions and employment status at the time of the second follow-up in 2006, and selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores who were not enrolled in a postsecondary institution but employed at the time of the second follow-up in 2006, by hours worked per week and selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores who were employed while enrolled in a postsecondary institution during the 2004–2005 or 2005–2006 academic years, by hours worked per week and selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores who were employed while enrolled in a postsecondary institution during the 2004–2005 or 2005–2006 academic years, by main reason for working and selected student, family, and school characteristics
  • GEDs and high school completions of 2003–2004 high school graduates by 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. High school completion status of 2001–2002 high school sophomores by 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. GED and high school equivalency attainment for 2001–2002 sophomores who had not graduated by 2003–2004, as of 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores who were high school graduates as of the summer of 2004, by race/ethnicity and high school sector
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Percentage distribution of academic year 2001-02 tenth-graders, by high school completion status and birth of first child, Jan 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 5. Percentage distribution of academic year 2001-02 tenth-graders, high school completion status and conception of first child, Jan 2006
  • New Table Listing Marital status, parental status, community service, and military service, 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores, by current marital status and selected student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores, by current marital status and selected school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores, by current parental status and selected student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores, by current parental status and selected high school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 5. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores performing unpaid or community service at any time during 2004 to 2006, by type of organization and selected student, family, and high school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 6. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores performing unpaid volunteer or community service at any time during 2004 to 2006 and the percentage distribution among those students, by frequency of service and selected student, family, and high school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 7. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores, by millitary service since leaving high school and selected student, family and high school characteristics
  • New Table ListingOn-time and late high school completion, high school seniors of 1992 and 2004
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Age at high school graduation for spring 1990 high school sophomores, by select student background characteristics: 2000
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Percentage of high school seniors in 2004, by birth month and year
  • New Table ListingPostsecondary enrollment of 2003-2004 high school seniors by college preparation activities, 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Percentage distribution of 2003-2004 high school seniors ever enrolled in a postsecondary institution, by sector of first postsecondary institution attended, student and family characteristics, and importance of financial aid
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Percentage distribution of 2003-2004 high school seniors ever enrolled in a postsecondary institution, by sector of first postsecondary institution attended and college preparation program
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Percentage of 2003-2004 high school seniors enrolled in a postsecondary institution in 2006, by sources of college information reported in 2004, and student and family characteristic
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Percentage distribution of 2003-2004 high school seniors enrolled in a postsecondary institution in 2006, by individual source of college information reported in 2004, and student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 5. Percentage distribution of 2003-2004 high school seniors, by postsecondary enrollment status in 2006, and student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 6. Percentage of 2003-2004 high school seniors and percentage distribution of their postsecondary enrollment status in 2006, by sources of college information reported in 2004
  • Postsecondary enrollments of 2003–04 high school graduates by 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Plans of 2003–04 high school graduates for postsecondary enrollment immediately after high school
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Timing of first postsecondary enrollment
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Sector of first postsecondary institution attended
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Selectivity of first postsecondary institution attended
    • Tables/Figures Table 5. Highest level postsecondary institution attended
    • Tables/Figures Table 6. Current educational expectation
    • Tables/Figures Table 7. Highest education level attempted
    • Tables/Figures Table 8. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores who were enrolled in a 4-year college or university at the time of the 2006 follow-up, by race/ethnicity and sector of high school
  • Postsecondary persistence of 2003–04 high school graduates by 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Student postsecondary persistence from year 1 to year 2: High school sophomores in 2002 who were surveyed in 2006, by postsecondary sector and student race/ethnicity
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Student postsecondary persistence from year 1 to year 2: High school seniors in 2004 who were surveyed in 2006, by postsecondary sector and student race/ethnicity
  • Postsecondary student financial aid applications of 2003–04 high school graduates
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Postsecondary enrollment status and level of high school graduates who filed a FAFSA for academic year 2004–05
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Postsecondary enrollment status and level of high school graduates who did not file a FAFSA for academic year 2004–05
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Percentage of academic year 2004–05 FAFSA filers who received a federal loan or Pell grant, by level of first postsecondary program attended
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Percentage of academic year 2004–05 FAFSA filers who received a Pell grant, by funding status, postsecondary enrollment status and level
    • Tables/Figures Table 5. Percentage of academic year 2004–05 FAFSA filers who received a federal loan, by funding status, postsecondary enrollment status and level
    • Tables/Figures Table 6. Percentage of academic year 2004–05 FAFSA non-filers who received a federal loan, by funding status, postsecondary enrollment status and level
  • New Table ListingReasons for postsecondary enrollment decisions, 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores not enrolled in postsecondary institutions in 2006 and percentage distribution of their educational expectations in 2006, by selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores not yet enrolled in postsecondary institutions as of 2006, by reasons for not enrolling and selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores not yet enrolled in postsecondary institutions in 2006 and percentage distribution of their main reason for not enrolling, by selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores who delayed postsecondary enrollment, by reasons for delaying enrollment and selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 5. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores who delayed postsecondary enrollment and percentage distribution of their main reason for delaying enrollment, by selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 6. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores who had attended more than one postsecondary institution as of 2006, by reasons for transferring and selected student, family, and high school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 7. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores who had ever attended a postsecondary institution as of 2006, by financing methods for higher education and selected student, family, and high school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 8. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores neither enrolled in postsecondary institutions nor employed in 2006 and percentage distribution of their main reason not employed, by selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 9. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores neither enrolled in postsecondary institutions nor employed in 2006 and percentage distribution of their educational expectations in 2006, by selected student, family, and school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 10. Percentage of 2002 high school sophomores reporting specific reasons for attending their first postsecondary institution, by selected student, family, and high school characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 11. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores reporting main reason for attending their first postsecondary institution, by selected student, family, and high school characteristics
  • New Table Listing Selected characteristics of postsecondary STEM and non-STEM majors, 2006
    • Tables/Figures Table 1. Percentage distribution of 2003–2004 high school seniors, by intended STEM and non-STEM major upon beginning postsecondary study and selected student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 2. Percentage distribution of 2003–2004 high school seniors, by intended STEM and non-STEM major upon beginning postsecondary study and STEM courses taken in high school
    • Tables/Figures Table 3. Percentage distribution of 2003–2004 high school seniors who intended to pursue a STEM major upon beginning postsecondary study, by educational expectation in 2006 and selected student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 4. Percentage distribution of 2003–2004 high school seniors who intended to pursue a STEM major upon beginning postsecondary study, by educational expectation in 2006 and STEM courses taken in high school
    • Tables/Figures Table 5. Percentage distribution of 2003–2004 high school seniors, by enrollment in a postsecondary institution in 2006 and selected student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 6. Percentage distribution of 2003-2004 high school seniors ever enrolled in a postsecondary institution, by level of first postsecondary institution attended and intended major upon beginning postsecondary study
    • Tables/Figures Table 7. Percentage distribution of 2003-2004 high school seniors ever enrolled in a postsecondary institution, by enrollment intensity of first postsecondary institution attended and intended major upon beginning postsecondary study
    • Tables/Figures Table 8. Percentage distribution of 2003–2004 high school seniors enrolled in a postsecondary institution in 2006, by declaration of major and selected student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 9. Percentage distribution of 2003–2004 high school seniors enrolled in a postsecondary institution with a declared major in 2006, by STEM and non-STEM major in 2006 and selected student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 10. Percentage distribution of 2003–2004 high school seniors enrolled in a postsecondary institution with a declared major in 2006, by STEM and non-STEM major in 2006 and STEM courses taken in high school
    • Tables/Figures Table 11. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores ever enrolled in a postsecondary institution, by sector of first postsecondary institution, intended major, and student and family characteristics
    • Tables/Figures Table 12. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores ever enrolled in a postsecondary institution, by sector of first postsecondary institution, intended major and high school math enjoyment
    • Tables/Figures Table 13. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores ever enrolled in a postsecondary institution, by sector of first postsecondary institution, intended major, and self-efficacy on high school math tests and assignments
    • Tables/Figures Table 14. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores ever enrolled in a postsecondary institution, by sector of first postsecondary institution, intended major and self-efficacy in high school math classes
    • Tables/Figures Table 15. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores enrolled in a postsecondary institution in 2006 who declared a major, by STEM and non-STEM major in 2006 and high school math enjoyment
    • Tables/Figures Table 16. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores enrolled in a postsecondary institution in 2006 who declared a major, by STEM or non-STEM major in 2006 and self-efficacy in high school math classes
    • Tables/Figures Table 17. Percentage distribution of 2002 high school sophomores enrolled in a postsecondary institution in 2006 who declared a major, by STEM or non-STEM major in 2006 and self-efficacy on high school math tests and assignments

Would you like to help us improve our products and website by taking a short survey?

YES, I would like to take the survey

or

No Thanks

The survey consists of a few short questions and takes less than one minute to complete.