Skip Navigation


Table 5. Percentage distribution of academic year 2001-02 tenth-graders, high school completion status and conception of first child, Jan 2006

Students' first child conception High school completion status
No high school completion High school completion    
Left high school before Sept. 2003   Left high school between Sept. 2003 and Aug. 2004   Left high school after Aug. 2004 or still enrolled   Completed high school before Sept.2003   Completed high school between Sept. 2003 and Aug. 2004   Completed high school between Sept. 2004 and Jan. 2006   Completed GED  
                             
Male 3.1   2.9   2.7   2.9   80.6   3.4   4.3  
First child conception (birth – 9 mo) before or during Aug 2003 22.8   10.7 ! 7.5 ! 7.8 ! 34.9      
First child conception between Sept 2003 and Aug 2004 (expected completion date) 8.6 !   6.3 !   50.3   8.8 ! 13.4 !
First child conception between Sept 2004 and April 2005 11.3 ! 11.3 !   3.9 ! 55.2     9.6 !
Respondent with no biological children before Jan 2006 2.5   2.5   2.5   2.8   82.6   3.3   3.9  
                             
Female 2.4   1.9   1.6   2.6   86.5   2.2   2.8  
First child conception (birth – 9 mo) before or during Aug 2003 20.8   7.9     4.9   46.4   3.9 ! 10.1  
First child conception between Sept 2003 and Aug 2004 (expected completion date) 8.7   6.9   7.1   5.8   57.8   4.3 ! 9.4  
First child conception between Sept 2004 and April 2005 7.5   4.5 ! 4.7 !   71.1   4.9 ! 4.9 !
Respondent with no biological children before Jan 2006 0.8   1.2   1.0   2.3   90.9   1.9   1.9  
! Interpret data with caution. Estimate is unstable because the coefficient of variation (CV) for this estimate is 30 percent or greater (i.e., the standard error represents 30 percent or more of the estimate).
‡ Reporting standards are not met. The coefficient of variation (CV) for this estimate is 50 percent or greater (i.e., the standard error represents 50 percent or more of the estimate).
NOTE: All estimates are weighted by F2QWT, where G10COHRT=1. This weight chosen over BYF2WT, because it includes sophomore base year nonrespondents, added into ELS first follow-up and since all analysis variables used were from ELS second follow-up. Details may not sum to 100 percent due to rounding.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Education Longitudinal Study of 2002 (ELS:02), Second follow-up collected in 2006.