Skip Navigation
small NCES header image
Title:  The Evaluation of Charter School Impacts: Final Report
Description: Adding to the growing debate and evidence base on the effects of charter schools, this evaluation was conducted in 36 charter middle schools in 15 states. It compares the outcomes of 2,330 students who applied to these schools and were randomly assigned by lotteries to be admitted (lottery winners) or not admitted (lottery losers) to the schools. Both sets of students were tracked over two years and data on student achievement, academic progress, behavior, and attitudes were collected. The study is the first large-scale randomized trial of the effectiveness of charter schools in varied types of communities and states.

Key findings include:
  • On average, charter middle schools that held lotteries were neither more nor less successful than traditional public schools in improving math or reading test scores, attendance, grade promotion, or student conduct within or outside of school. Being admitted to a study charter school did significantly improve both students' and parents' satisfaction with school.
  • Charter middle schools' impact on student achievement varied significantly across schools.
  • Charter middle schools in urban areasóas well as those serving higher proportions of low-income and low achieving studentsówere more effective (relative to their nearby traditional public schools) than were other charter schools in improving math test scores. Some operational features of charter middle schools were associated with less negative impacts on achievement. These features include smaller enrollments and the use of ability grouping in math or English classes. There was no significant relationship between achievement impacts and the charter schools' policy environment.
Because the study could only include charter middle schools that held lotteries, the results do not necessarily apply to the full set of charter middle schools in the U.S.
Online Availability:
Cover Date: June 2010
Web Release: June 29, 2010
Publication #: NCEE 20104029
Center/Program: NCEE
Authors: Philip Gleason, Melissa Clark, Christina Clark Tuttle, and Emily Dwoyer: Mathematica Policy Research
Type of Product: Evaluation Report
Keywords:
Questions: For questions about the content of this Evaluation Report, please contact:
Marsha Silverberg.
 
 
Would you like to help us improve our products and website by taking a short survey?

YES, I would like to take the survey

or

No Thanks

The survey consists of a few short questions and takes less than one minute to complete.
National Center for Education Statistics - http://nces.ed.gov
U.S. Department of Education