Table 12. | Percent and standard error for public elementary schools reporting various ways in which dance or drama/theatre was taught or incorporated into other subject or curriculum areas, by school characteristics: School year 2009–10 (Table 12—Continued |
School characteristic | Dance | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Taught as a separate subject |
Taught as part of the physical education program | Taught as part of the music curriculum | Activities and instruction are integrated into other curriculum areas | Other ways of teaching dance |
Any integration with other subject or curriculum areas | |||||||
Percent | Standard error | Percent | Standard error | Percent | Standard error | Percent | Standard error | Percent | Standard error | Percent | Standard error | |
All public elementary schools | 3 | (0.7) | 44 | (1.8) | 37 | (1.5) | 29 | (1.7) | 5 | (0.7) | 61 | (1.7) |
Enrollment size | ||||||||||||
Less than 300 | ‡ | (†) | 44 | (4.0) | 34 | (3.3) | 25 | (3.4) | 5! | (1.9) | 57 | (3.9) |
300 to 499 | 4 | (1.2) | 41 | (2.6) | 42 | (2.6) | 34 | (3.0) | 4 | (0.9) | 64 | (2.9) |
500 or more | 4 | (0.9) | 46 | (2.3) | 33 | (2.3) | 28 | (1.9) | 4 | (1.0) | 61 | (2.3) |
Community type | ||||||||||||
City | 7 | (1.5) | 39 | (3.1) | 36 | (2.7) | 32 | (2.8) | 6 | (1.4) | 59 | (2.9) |
Suburban | 2! | (0.8) | 47 | (2.6) | 38 | (2.4) | 31 | (2.6) | 5 | (1.2) | 65 | (2.8) |
Town | ‡ | (†) | 35 | (4.7) | 38 | (4.8) | 27 | (4.0) | 5! | (2.5) | 59 | (5.2) |
Rural | ‡ | (†) | 48 | (3.2) | 34 | (2.9) | 26 | (3.1) | 3! | (0.9) | 59 | (2.9) |
Region | ||||||||||||
Northeast | 5! | (1.8) | 40 | (3.7) | 41 | (3.4) | 32 | (3.1) | 7 | (1.6) | 63 | (3.6) |
Southeast | 2! | (0.8) | 40 | (3.3) | 33 | (2.8) | 26 | (2.6) | 5 | (1.2) | 56 | (3.4) |
Central | ‡ | (†) | 47 | (3.2) | 41 | (2.4) | 27 | (3.4) | 3! | (1.1) | 64 | (2.7) |
West | ‡ | (†) | 45 | (3.2) | 31 | (2.8) | 31 | (2.8) | 4 | (1.3) | 60 | (2.9) |
Percent combined enrollment of Black and other races/ethnicities1 | ||||||||||||
Less than 6 percent | 3! | (1.4) | 53 | (4.1) | 41 | (3.7) | 32 | (3.7) | 3! | (1.3) | 67 | (3.7) |
6 to 20 percent | ‡ | (†) | 44 | (3.7) | 40 | (3.5) | 27 | (2.9) | 4! | (1.6) | 61 | (3.6) |
21 to 49 percent | 2! | (0.7) | 44 | (3.8) | 38 | (3.5) | 30 | (2.8) | 5 | (1.4) | 64 | (3.8) |
50 percent or more | 5 | (1.3) | 37 | (3.0) | 30 | (2.6) | 29 | (2.6) | 6 | (1.1) | 55 | (2.7) |
Percent of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch | ||||||||||||
0 to 25 percent | 3! | (1.0) | 56 | (3.8) | 49 | (2.8) | 34 | (3.1) | 4! | (1.4) | 73 | (2.8) |
26 to 50 percent | ‡ | (†) | 47 | (3.5) | 34 | (3.2) | 30 | (2.9) | 5! | (1.6) | 63 | (3.6) |
51 to 75 percent | 4! | (1.2) | 36 | (3.2) | 33 | (3.0) | 24 | (3.0) | 4 | (1.2) | 54 | (3.2) |
76 percent or more | 5 | (1.2) | 38 | (3.4) | 31 | (3.3) | 30 | (3.1) | 5 | (1.2) | 55 | (3.6) |
See notes at end of table. |