
Data from the state nonfiscal CCD files are used to calculate averaged freshman graduation rates in this report. Graduates include only diploma recipients in this indicator. Other diploma recipients and those awarded high school equivalency credentials such as GEDs are not considered graduates. The purpose of these exclusions is to make the averaged freshman graduation rate as similar as possible conceptually to Adequate Yearly Progress provisions in the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) of 2001 (P.L. 107-110). These provisions require measurement of on-time graduation from public high schools, and explicitly exclude GEDs and other types of non-regular diplomas. Another reason for the exclusion of equivalency credentials in the averaged freshman graduation rate is that not all states report giving equivalency credentials, so comparable estimates across states would not be possible.

Although enrollments are reported by grade, some states report ungraded students. To adjust for this, an allocation procedure used in the Common Core of Data "Local Education Agency Universe Survey Dropout and Completion Data" file was applied. Through this process the data for ungraded enrollment counts were redistributed across grades in proportion to the graded enrollment of the state, and the resulting estimates for grades 8, 9, and 10 were added to the reported enrollment counts for those grades. For the 2002-03 school year, the averaged freshman graduation rate for public schools in the United States is based on the 2,719,947 diploma recipients reported for school year 2002-03, divided by the average of the 3,529,963 8th grade student enrollment reported for October 1998-99, the 3,986,992 9th grade student enrollment reported for October 1999-2000, and the 3,529,652 10th grade student enrollment reported for October 2000-01. The 2,719,947 public school diploma recipients divided by the 3,682,202 averaged number of public school freshmen, multiplied by 100, results in a 2002-03 public school graduation rate for the United States of 73.9 percent. The same formula is applied to compute the 2002-03 AFGR for public school students in each state.
More demographic information about students is available on the district-level nonfiscial CCD data files. However, the district level data are incomplete, so additional demographic information about graduates is not shown in this report. NCES is evaluating different options for imputing these missing data so that more detailed analyses by demographic characteristics can be undertaken. Once imputations are complete, state level totals from the imputed data may differ somewhat from rates based on the state level data shown here.
Note that the rate is not the same as a true cohort graduation rate that shows the proportion of actual first-time 9th grade students who graduated within 4 years of starting 9th grade. A true cohort rate requires data that track a given set of students over time. The CCD data used for the averaged freshman graduation rate are collected using repeating cross-sectional surveys. Individual students are not followed from year to year. Although the averaged freshman graduation rate was selected as the best of the available alternatives, there are several factors that make it fall short of a true on-time graduation rate. First, the averaged freshman class is, at best, an approximation of the actual number of first-time freshmen. To the extent that the averaging differs from actual net transfers into and out of a class, and to the extent that it does not accurately capture grade retention and dropout rates across all four years of a given freshman class' expected high school stay, the estimate will be wrong.
Second, by including all graduates in a specific year, the graduates may include students who repeated a grade in high school or completed high school early and, thus, are not on-time graduates in that year.
Taking these factors one at a time, it is possible that more high school students will move out of a given jurisdiction than move into it during the 4 years between the beginning of 9th grade and the expected graduation date. The averaged freshman count would overestimate the size of the actual cohort and thus underestimate the graduation rate. On the other hand, if more high school students moved into a jurisdiction than moved out during this 4-year period, the averaged freshman count would underestimate the size of the cohort and thus overestimate the graduation rate. Similarly, the use of 8th, 9th, and 10th grade enrollment counts to estimate a first-time freshman class may not work as intended in many situations. Using 8th and 9th grade enrollment counts can be inaccurate to the extent that they do not adequately account for grade retention at 9th grade. Retention rates at 9th grade tend to be relatively large. While adding 8th grade enrollments to the average may help diminish this problem, it is likely that in many cases it will not wholly adjust for actual 9th grade retention rates, thus overestimating the first-time freshman count and underestimating the graduation rate. Using 9th and 10th grade enrollment numbers can be inaccurate to the extent that the 10th grade counts exclude 9th graders who dropped out from the previous year (effectively underestimating the cohort) or include students retained in 10th grade (effectively overestimating the cohort).
The inclusion of graduates who spent more or less than 4 years in high school increases the number of graduates in the numerator and yields a higher estimated rate than would be the case if only on-time graduates were included in the numerator. On the other hand, not recording early graduates with their actual cohort decreases the graduation rate for a class.