Skip Navigation
small NCES header image
Building An Automated Record System : Back to Home National Forum on Education Statistics
Introduction Purpose of this Booklet Contents of this Booklet Description of a Student Record Description of a Student Record System Benefits of a Well-Designed Automated Student Record System Steps for Designing and Implementing an Automated Student Record System Summary Resource List
Step 1Step 2Step 3Step 4Step 5Step 6Step 7Step 8Step 9Step 10Step 11Step 12

Make sure that information about individual students cannot be viewed in reports.

Step 12 : Develop procedures for appropriate reporting of student data.

The final step focuses on other cautions related to the use of data from student record systems that must be addressed. When reporting aggregate information about student participation in a program (e.g., special education or Title I), safeguards must be in place to prevent individual student information from becoming known to anyone without proper authorization. The importance of such safeguards cannot be overstated since FERPA restricts the disclosure of individual student information.

One common error made by organizations that produce a variety of reports is to report specifics on groups of students so small that they can be identified individually from the data. Often these organizations produce specific reports with counts of students by type (such as by grade level by race/ethnicity by sex). If you look at school data, you may see that there is one Hispanic female in grade six. Later, when assessment results are available, the organization produces a school summary with percentages of students by type who have passed the test or average student scores by student types. While the latter (assessment) reports may mask the number of students in each category, it is possible to use the former (enrollment) reports to see that the Hispanic female in grade six made a specific grade and/or passed the test. Thus, it is important to establish procedures for identifying where information about the identity of specific students can be obtained. In this instance, assessment reports should not be released if the student grouping contains fewer than three persons.

It is a good idea to have someone "eyeball" the data before it is published. Compare the data to other sources, such as last year's data, to see if there are major differences that cannot be explained. If the data do not look correct, then the procedures used to run the report should be checked and the report rerun. It is far better to delay the publishing of correct data than to publish incorrect data in a timely fashion.

Inappropriate Release of Confidential Data

The parents of a first-grade student decided to have their child take an optional standardized test. One other first-grade student in the same school took the test. When average scores by grade for the school were published, the average for the first graders taking the test was included, even though only two students took the test. As a result, the parents of each of the two first graders were able to figure out the score made by the other student.

Back To Top

Would you like to help us improve our products and website by taking a short survey?

YES, I would like to take the survey


No Thanks

The survey consists of a few short questions and takes less than one minute to complete.
National Center for Education Statistics -
U.S. Department of Education