
|
|
| Table 2.9. Types of promotion and graduation practices based on statewide exit and end-of-course exams, by state: 2005–06 and 2009 | |||||||||
| State | Promotion contingent on performance on statewide exams (2005–06) | Graduation contingent on performance on statewide exit or end-of-course exams (2009) | State has appeals process or alternative route to diplomas for students who fail exit or end-of-course exams (2009) | Exit or end-of-course exams are based on state 10th grade standards or higher (2009) | State requires remediation for students failing promotion, exit, or end-of-course exams (2005–06) | State finances remediation for students failing promotion, exit, or end-of-course exams (2009) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States1 | 8 | 24 | 21 | 20 | 19 | 17 | |||
| Alabama | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Alaska | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | |||
| Arizona | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Arkansas | No | No | 2 | No | No | No | No | ||
| California | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Colorado | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Connecticut | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Delaware | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | No | |||
| District of Columbia | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Florida | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Georgia | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Hawaii | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Idaho | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |||
| Illinois | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Indiana | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |||
| Iowa | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Kansas | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Kentucky | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Louisiana | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Maine | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Maryland | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Massachusetts | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |||
| Michigan | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Minnesota | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |||
| Mississippi | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No | |||
| Missouri | Yes | 3 | No | No | No | Yes | No | ||
| Montana | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Nebraska | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Nevada | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |||
| New Hampshire | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| New Jersey | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |||
| New Mexico | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | |||
| New York | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | |||
| North Carolina | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | |||
| North Dakota | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Ohio | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Oklahoma | No | No | 4 | No | No | No | No | ||
| Oregon | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Pennsylvania | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Rhode Island | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| South Carolina | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | |||
| South Dakota | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Tennessee | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | |||
| Texas | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | |||
| Utah | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Vermont | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Virginia | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |||
| Washington | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | |||
| West Virginia | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Wisconsin | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | |||
| Wyoming | No | No | No | No | No | No | |||
|
1 National total reflects the number of "Yes" responses for the column. 2 Arkansas plans to make graduation contingent on performance on exit exams beginning with the class of 2010. 3 Missouri permits each school district to establish its own method for assessing students. 4 Oklahoma plans to make graduation contingent on performance on exit exams beginning with the class of 2012. SOURCE: Quality Counts at 10: A Decade of Standards Based Education, Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, Education Week, 2006 and Diplomas Count 2009: Broader Horizons, Editorial Projects in Education Research Center, Education Week, 2009.Data Source |
|||||||||