Skip Navigation

Search
Illustration/Logo View Quarterly by  This Issue  |  Volume and Issue  |  Topics
Education Statistics Quarterly
Vol 6, Issue 4, Topic: Early Childhood Education
Children Born in 2001: First Results From the Base Year of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B)
By: Kristin Denton Flanagan and Jerry West
 
This article was excerpted from the Introduction and Selected Findings of the E.D. TAB of the same name. The sample survey data are from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B).  
 
 

Introduction

This E.D. TAB provides descriptive information about children born in the United States in 2001. It presents information on certain child and family characteristics, on children's mental and physical skills, on children's first experiences in child care, and on the fathers of these children. The report profiles data from a nationally representative sample of children at about 9 months of age, both overall and for various subgroups (i.e., male and female, children from different racial/ethnic groups, and children living in different types of families).

Data source

The ECLS-B is a nationally representative sample of the nearly 4 million children born in the United States in the year 2001.1 During the first wave of the study, 10,688 parents provided information and 10,221 children were directly assessed.

The ECLS-B was designed to collect information from children and their families for the first time when the children were about 9 months of age (i.e., 8 to 10 months). However, information was collected from a few children as young as 6 months and as old as 22 months. The term "9 months" is used throughout this document to refer to the data collection that took place between fall 2001 and fall 2002, at which time most of the sampled children were about 9 months of age (72 percent of the population was 8 to 10 months of age). For ease of reporting, this E.D. TAB uses the term "about 9 months of age" to refer to the entire population of children in the study. Four additional waves of data collection are planned for when the children are 2-year-olds, preschool-aged (e.g., age 4), and then when they are in kindergarten.

Organization of this report

The information in this report is presented in four sections: (1) characteristics of the children and their families; (2) children's early mental and physical skills; (3) children's first experiences in child care; and (4) the fathers of these children. The topics selected for this initial release of baseline information are only a small sampling of the types of questions that can be addressed.


Selected Findings

Demographic characteristics of children and their families

Information on the demographic characteristics of the children and their families was largely provided by the parents as part of the parent interview and also drawn from information presented on the child's birth certificate.

In 2001, of babies born in the United States

  • 51 percent were boys and 49 percent were girls;
  • 54 percent were White, non-Hispanic; 14 percent were Black, non-Hispanic; 26 percent were Hispanic; 3 percent were Asian/Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic; 1 percent were American Indian, non-Hispanic; and 4 percent were multiracial, non-Hispanic;
  • 3 percent of babies born were twins, less than 0.5 percent were part of other multiple births (e.g., triplets, quadruplets), and 97 percent were single births;
  • 12 percent of babies were born premature, 6 percent were low birth weight (i.e., more than 3.3 pounds to 5.5 pounds), and 1 percent were very low birth weight (i.e., 3.3 pounds or less); and
  • 11 percent of babies were born to teenage mothers2 (i.e., 15 to 19 years of age).
When these children were about 9 months of age
  • 23 percent were living in families whose household income was below the poverty threshold;
  • 64 percent were living with both of their married biological parents, 14 percent were living with unmarried biological parents, and 20 percent were living with one parent;
  • 27 percent were living with mothers who had less than a high school education, and 17 percent were living with fathers who had less than a high school education; and
  • 24 percent were living with mothers who had a bachelor's degree or higher, and 24 percent were living with fathers who had a bachelor's degree or higher.

Children's early mental and physical skills

The ECLS-B assessment of young children's mental and physical development relies on a direct measure of children-the Bayley Short Form-Research Edition (BSF-R), which was developed for use in the ECLS-B. The BSF-R is a shortened version of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-Second Edition (BSID-II) (Bayley 1993), a standardized assessment of mental and motor developmental status for children from birth to 42 months of age.

This E.D. TAB presents information on young children's specific mental and physical skills (i.e., proficiencies). Proficiency scores provide a means of distinguishing status in specific skills within a content area. Clusters of two to five test questions having similar content and difficulty were included at several points along the score scale of the BSF-R mental and physical assessments. Clusters of items provide a more reliable test of proficiency than do single items.3

Below are the five proficiencies for early mental skills.

  • Exploring objects. The child is reaching for and holding objects. He/she may have no specific purpose or goal except to play or discover.
  • Exploring objects with a purpose. The child is manipulating objects with a purpose (e.g., to see what makes the ringing sound in a bell).
  • Babbling. The child is making simple sounds and gestures (e.g., babbling or jabbering).
  • Early problem solving. The child is using reasoning to interact with objects (e.g., if a toy is out of reach, using another object, like another toy, to bring the desired toy within reach).
  • Communicating with words. The child understands and uses words, both receptively (pointing to named objects) and expressively (saying words).
Below are the five proficiencies for early physical skills.
  • Eye-hand coordination. The child demonstrates eye-hand coordination as he/she reaches for objects.
  • Sitting. The child can sit alone, without leaning against something or other assistance.
  • Prewalking. The child is taking steps and supporting his/her weight while standing, with assistance (moving along furniture or holding onto someone's hand).
  • Independent walking. The child is walking alone, without assistance (without holding onto something or someone).
  • Balance. The child can balance in various positions (e.g., squatting, standing on one foot).
The ECLS-B was designed to collect information from children and their families for the first time when the children were about 9 months of age (i.e., 8 to 10 months). However, information was collected from a few children as young as 6 months and as old as 22 months. Young children's mental and physical skills develop rapidly. Therefore, this E.D. TAB presents information on young children's skills by their age at assessment, in several ways. First, this E.D. TAB presents information on the children in the sample 8 to 10 months of age at the time of assessment. Next, the E.D. TAB presents information on the children in the sample who were 11 to 13 months of age at the time of assessment. Tables 4 and 5 in the full report present a breakdown by age (i.e., age at assessment, month by month).4

When children were 8 to 10 months old, in terms of their mental skills (figure A)

  • 99 percent were exploring objects in play;
  • 88 percent were exploring objects with a purpose;
  • 47 percent were babbling;
  • 3 percent were demonstrating early problem solving; and
  • less than 0.5 percent were using words.
When children were 8 to 10 months old, in terms of their physical skills (figure B)
  • 91 percent demonstrated eye-hand coordination;
  • 93 percent were sitting;
  • 73 percent were showing prewalking skills;
  • 19 percent were walking; and
  • 1 percent could balance.
When children were 11 to 13 months old, in terms of their mental skills (figure A)
  • 100 percent were exploring objects in play;
  • 97 percent were exploring objects with a purpose;
  • 72 percent were babbling;
  • 17 percent were demonstrating early problem solving; and
  • 5 percent were using words.
When children were 11 to 13 months old, in terms of their physical skills (figure B)
  • 96 percent demonstrated good eye-hand coordination;
  • 98 percent were sitting;
  • 91 percent were showing prewalking skills;
  • 55 percent were walking; and
  • 10 percent could balance.

back to top


Figure A. Percentage of children demonstrating certain mental skills at 8 to 10 months of age and at 11 to 13 months of age: 2001

Figure A. Percentage of children demonstrating certain mental skills at 8 to 10 months of age and at 11 to 13 months of age: 2001
# Less than .5 percent.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort, Restricted-Use File (NCES 2004-093). (Originally published as figure 4 on p. 12 of the complete report from which this article is excerpted.)


Figure B. Percentage of children demonstrating certain physical skills at 8 to 10 months of age and at 11 to 13 months of age: 2001

Figure B. Percentage of children demonstrating certain physical skills at 8 to 10 months of age and at 11 to 13 months of age: 2001
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort, Restricted-Use File (NCES 2004-093). (Originally published as figure 5 on p. 12 of the complete report from which this article is excerpted.)


Children's first experiences in child care

As part of the parent interview, information was collected on children's first experiences in child care. Parents provided information on whether their child was in care, the type of care, the number of hours in care, and the age at which the child first entered care. The ECLS-B seeks to provide information on the care that young children receive on a regular basis from persons other than their parents.5

  • When children were about 9 months of age, approximately one-half (50 percent) were in some kind of regular child care arrangement, such as a center-based care arrangement or care provided by a nonrelative or relative in a private home (table A).
  • Black children (63 percent) were more likely to be in some kind of child care arrangement, compared to White (49 percent), Hispanic (46 percent), and Asian children (47 percent). Children whose mothers work (full time or part time) are more likely to be in child care than children whose mothers do not work or who are looking for work. Children in families who were not poor (at or above the poverty threshold) (52 percent) were more likely to be in child care than children from poor families (43 percent) (table A).
  • Among children about 9 months of age (table A)
    • 26 percent were in relative care as their primary arrangement,6 where they received care from someone related to them other than the parent, such as a grandparent, aunt, uncle, sibling, or some other relative. Relative care could be in the child's home or in the home of the caregiver.
    • 15 percent were in nonrelative care as their pri- mary arrangement, where they received care from someone who is not related to them, such as a nanny, home-based care provider, regular sitter, or neighbor. This does not include day care centers or preschools. The care could be in the child's home or in the home of the caregiver.
    • 9 percent were in center-based care as their pri- mary arrangement, such as early learning cen- ters, nursery schools, and preschools (including Early Head Start).
    • 1 percent had a primary arrangement that was actually multiple arrangements, where they spent equal numbers of hours across different care ar- rangement types (such as 20 hours a week with a relative and 20 hours a week in a center-based program).
  • The type of child care children received varied by their race/ethnicity. Black children were more likely than White, Hispanic, or Asian children to be in center-based care. White children were less likely than Black, Hispanic, or Asian children to be cared for by a relative (table A).
  • Of children in child care, 39 percent began when they were younger than 3 months, 47 percent were 3 to 6 months old, and 14 percent started care when they were older than 6 months. In terms of hours per week in child care, 19 percent of children about 9 months of age were in an arrangement 10 hours or fewer, 27 percent were in an arrangement 11 to 30 hours, 31 percent were in an arrangement 31 to 40 hours, and 24 percent were in an arrangement more than 40 hours.
  • The age at which children entered child care and the number of hours they spent in the arrangement varied by their race/ethnicity. Asian children were more likely than White, Black, or Hispanic children to enter a child care arrangement when they were younger than 3 months of age. Asian children were more likely than White, Black, or Hispanic children to spend more than 40 hours a week in care, and Black children were more likely than White or Hispanic children to spend more than 40 hours a week in care.
  • Children in relative care were more likely to be in care for 10 hours or fewer a week than children in nonrelative care or a center-based program. Children in multiple care arrangements were more likely to be in care more than 40 hours a week than children in a single care arrangement.


Table A. Percentage of children participating in child care at about 9 months of age, by primary type of arrangement, and by child and family characteristics: 2001

Child and family characteristics Care arrangement
Relative care Nonrelative care Center-based care Multiple arrangements No regular arrangement
    Total 26 15 9 1 50
Child’s sex
    Male 26 15 9 1 50
    Female 26 16 8 1 50
Child’s race/ethnicity
    White, non-Hispanic 21 17 9 1 51
    Black, non-Hispanic 33 15 14 1 37
    Hispanic 30 11 5 # 54
    Asian, non-Hispanic 33 10 4 # 53
    Other, non-Hispanic1 28 14 10 1 46
Mother’s employment status
    Full time (35 hours or more) 39 29 17 1 15
    Part time 38 21 8 2 33
    Looking for work 22 6 7 # 65
    Not in workforce 9 4 3 # 84
    No mother in household 37 2 17 # 45
Poverty status
    Below poverty threshold 28 8 7 1 57
    At or above poverty threshold 25 17 9 1 48

# Rounds to zero.

1Other includes Native Hawaiian, other Pacific Islanders, American Indian, Alaska Native, and multiracial children.

NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort, Restricted-Use File (NCES 2004-093). (Originally published as table 6 on p. 17 of the complete report from which this article is excerpted.)

back to top


Fathers in children's lives

As part of the parent interview, information was collected on whether or not there was a father in the household (e.g., biological, nonbiological, no resident father) and if there was no resident biological father in the household, then information was collected on the amount of contact the biological father had with the child.

  • When children were about 9 months of age, 1 in 5 (20 percent) lived in households with no father (table B).
  • Black children (58 percent) were more likely than White children (10 percent), Hispanic children (20 percent), or Asian children (6 percent) to live in a household with no father present (table B). Forty-five percent of children living below the poverty threshold lived in households with no father present, while 12 percent of children living at or above the poverty threshold lived in households without a father.
  • In the ECLS-B, in about 99 percent of the interviews, the biological mother was the respondent.7 According to the child's mother, when there was no resident biological father in the household
    • 40 percent of young children had contact with their father the same day as the home visit (when the parent interview was conducted);
    • 38 percent of children had contact with their father within 2 to 7 days of the home visit;
    • 7 percent of children had contact with their father within the last 8 to 14 days of the home visit;
    • 2 percent of children had not seen their father in more than 2 weeks; and
    • 13 percent of children had never seen their father.
  • Of children with no resident father, 6 percent of Black children had nonresident fathers who had never had contact with them, compared to 18 percent of White children, 21 percent of Hispanic children, and 25 per-cent of Asian children.

Table B. Percentage of children with or without fathers in the household around 9 months of age, by child and family characteristics: 2001

Child and family characteristics All children Father in household
Biological Non- biological No father
   Total 100 79 1 20
Child’s sex
   Male 51 79 1 19
   Female 49 78 1 20
Child’s race/ethnicity
   White, non-Hispanic 54 88 2 10
   Black, non-Hispanic 14 41 1 58
   Hispanic 25 78 1 20
   Asian, non-Hispanic 3 93 # 6
   Other, non-Hispanic1 4 74 1 25
Poverty status
   Below poverty threshold 23 53 1 45
   At or above poverty threshold 77 86 1 12

# Rounds to zero.

1Other includes Native Hawaiian, other Pacific Islanders, American Indian, Alaska Native, and multiracial children.

NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding. In the absence of a biological parent, the father designation (i.e., nonbiological) was assigned to the adoptive, step, foster/guardian, partner (including household members defined as spouses/partners of the parent respondent but were not identified by the respondent as mothers/female guardians or fathers/male guardians), or "unknown-type" parent.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort, Restricted-Use File (NCES 2004-093). (Originally published as table 8 on p. 21 of the complete report from which this article is excerpted.)


Reference

Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley Scales of Infant Development, Second Edition Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.

Back to top


Footnotes

1Sampling was based on occurrence of birth as listed on the birth certificate. Sampled children subsequently identified by the state registrars as having died or who had been adopted near or at the time of birth were excluded. However, data were collected when the children were 9 months of age, so there are some cases with adoptive parents.

2Children with mothers less than 15 years of age were excluded from the study.

3For more information on the content, administration, and properties of the direct child assessment, please refer to appendix A of the full report.

4This E.D. TAB does not present information on children's mental and physical skills by characteristics such as children's sex, race/ethnicity, and poverty status. Preliminary analyses revealed that, for the most part at this age, the mental and physical skills discussed in this report do not significantly differ by children's sex, race/ethnicity, and poverty status. A future NCES report will examine group differences in children's mental and physical skills in more detail, presenting information from the 9-month collection and the 2-year collection of the ECLS-B.

5Parents include biological and adoptive parents as well as stepparents and guardians.

6Primary care arrangement is where the child spends the most hours. If the child spent equal time across two or more arrangements, primary care was classified as multiple arrangements.

7In the ECLS-B, this was by design. When the home visit was conducted, the interviewer specifically asked for the biological mother to be the respondent.


Data source: The NCES Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B).

For technical information, see the complete report: Flanagan, K.D., and West, J. (2004). Children Born in 2001: First Results From the Base Year of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) (NCES 2005-036).

Author affiliations: K. D. Flanagan, Education Statistics Services Institute; J. West, NCES.

For questions about content, contact Jennifer Park (jennifer.park@ed.gov).

To obtain the complete report (NCES 2005-036), call the toll-free ED Pubs Number (877-433-7827) or visit the NCES Electronic Catalog (http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch).


back to top