Skip Navigation
small header image
Digest of Education Statistics: 2006
Digest of Education Statistics: 2006

NCES 2007-017
July 2007


Table A-2. Design effects (DEFF) and root design effects (DEFT) for selected
Subsample characteristic Follow-up survey of 1980 sophomores in 1984 Follow-up survey of 1980 seniors in 1984 Follow-up survey of 1980 sophomores in 1986 Follow-up survey of 1980 seniors in 1986
Total sample 2.40 (1.54) 2.87 (1.69) 2.19 (1.47) 2.28 (1.50)
Sex         
Male (†) (†) 2.07 (1.43) 2.13 (1.45)
Female (†) (†) 2.06 (1.43) 2.26 (1.50)
        
Race/ethnicity         
White and other 2.06 (1.42) 2.09 (1.44) 1.92 (1.38) 1.70 (1.30)
Black 2.22 (1.47) 2.26 (1.50) 2.19 (1.47) 2.40 (1.54)
Hispanic 3.15 (1.73) 3.72 (1.92) 3.11 (1.76) 4.06 (2.01)
        
Socioeconomic status composite (SES)1          
Low 1.91 (1.37) 2.28 (1.50) 1.83 (1.35) 2.31 (1.51)
Middle 1.95 (1.39) 1.81 (1.34) 2.06 (1.42) 2.02 (1.42)
High 2.05 (1.42) 1.93 (1.38) 1.92 (1.38) 1.71 (1.30)
— Not available.
† Not applicable.
1 The SES index is a composite of five equally weighted measures: father's education, mother's education, family income, father's occupation, and presence of certain items in the respondent's household.
NOTE: The average design effect for the 1980 sophomore cohort first follow-up (1982) survey is 3.6 (1.89) and the average design effect for the 1980 senior first follow-up (1982) survey is 2.6 (1.62). Standard errors appear in parentheses.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, High School and Beyond Study of 1980 Sophomores (HS&B-So:80/84 and HS&B-So:80/86); and High School and Beyond Study of 1980 Seniors (HS&B-Sr:80/84 and HS&B-SR:80/86).


1990 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006, USA
Phone: (202) 502-7300 (map)