Large student weights generally come from compounding nonresponse adjustments at the school and student levels with artificially low first-stage selection probabilities, which can result from inaccurate enrollment data on the school frame used to define the school size measure. Even though measures are in place to limit the number and size of excessively large weights—such as the implementation of adjustment factor size constraints in both the school and student nonresponse procedures and the use of the school trimming procedure—large student weights can occur due to compounding effects of the various weighting components.
The student weight trimming procedure uses a multiple median rule to detect excessively large student weights. Any student weight within a given trimming group greater than a specified multiple of the median weight value of the given trimming group has its weight scaled back to that threshold. Student weight trimming was implemented separately by sample type (state-based or national), grade, school type (public or private), and subject. The multiples used were 3.5 for public school trimming groups and 4.5 for private school trimming groups. Trimming groups were defined by jurisdiction and Trial Urban District Assessment (TUDA) districts for the state-based public school samples at grades 4 and 8, nationally for the national public school sample at grade 12, and by private school type (Catholic and non-Catholic) for the private school samples at grades 4, 8, and 12.
The procedure computes the median of the nonresponse-adjusted student weights in the trimming group g for a given grade and subject sample. Any student k with a weight more than M times the median (M = 3.5 for public school trimming groups and 4.5 for private school trimming groups) received a trimming adjustment factor calculated as follows:
M is the trimming multiple,
MEDIANg is the median of nonresponse-adjusted student weights in trimming group g, and
STUWGTgk is the weight after student nonresponse adjustment for student k in trimming group g.
In the 2007 assessment, relatively few students had weights considered excessively large. Out of the approximately 920,000 students included in the combined 2007 assessment samples, 402 students required student weight trimming.