Skip to main content
Skip Navigation

​NAEP Technical DocumentationResults of NAEP Differential Item Functioning (DIF) Analyses

Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses are completed for all items in a NAEP assessment. DIF analyses have traditionally included Black, Hispanic, and female students as the "focal" groups, and White or male students as the "reference" groups. If sample sizes are sufficient, the DIF analysis will also include an expanded set of focal groups, such as Asian, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and American Indian or Alaska Native students. Items that exhibit a strong indication of DIF are labeled "C" for dichotomous items and "CC" for polytomous items. The number of items classified in each DIF category using the Mantel-Haenszel procedure are provided, along with information about items categorized as "C" or "CC".

Links to NAEP differential item functioning (DIF) results, national and state assessments, by subject area and year: Various years, 20002019
Subject areaYearType of sample
Arts2016 R3
2008 R3
Civics2018 R3
2014 R3
2010 R3
2006 R3
Economics2012 R3
2006 R3
Geography2018 R3
2014 R3
2010 R3
2001 R2 R3
Mathematics2019 R3
2017 R3
2015 R3
2013 R3
2011 R3
2009 R3
2007 R3
2005 R3
2003 R3
2000 R2 R3
Reading 2019 R3
2017 R3
2015 R3
2013 R3
2011 R3
2009 R3
2007 R3
2005 R3
2003 R3
2002 R3
2000 R2 R3
Science2019 R3
2015 R3
2011 R3
2009 R3
2005 R3
2000 R2 R3
Technology and engineering literacy (TEL)2018 R3
2014 R3
U.S. history2018 R3
2014 R3
2010 R3
2006 R3
2001 R2 R3
Vocabulary2015 R3
2011 R3
2009 R3
Writing2011 R3
† Not applicable.
NOTE: Because preliminary analyses of students' writing performance in the 2017 NAEP writing assessments at grades 4 and 8 revealed potentially confounding factors in measuring performance, results will not be publicly reported. R2 is the non-accommodated reporting sample; R3 is the accommodated reporting sample. If sampled students are classified as students with disabilities (SD) or English learners (EL), and school officials, using NAEP guidelines, determine that they can meaningfully participate in the NAEP assessment with accommodation, those students are included in the NAEP assessment with accommodation along with other sampled students including SD/EL students who do not need accommodations. The R3 sample is more inclusive than the R2 sample and excludes a smaller proportion of sampled students. The R3 sample is the only reporting sample used in NAEP after 2001. In NAEP, vocabulary, reading vocabulary, and meaning vocabulary refer to the same reporting scale. The block naming conventions used in the 2018 civics, geography, and U.S. history assessments are described in the document 2018 Block Naming Conventions in Data Products and TDW. The block naming conventions used in the 2019 mathematics, reading, and science assessments are described in the document 2019 Block Naming Conventions in Data Products and TDW.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 2000–2019 Assessments.

 

Links to NAEP differential item functioning (DIF) results, long-term trend assessments, by subject area and year: 2004, 2008, and 2012
Subject areaYearType of sample
Mathematics long-term trend2012 R3
Reading long-term trend R3
Mathematics long-term trend2008 R3
Reading long-term trend R3
Mathematics long-term trend2004 R3
Reading long-term trend R3
NOTE: R3 is the accommodated reporting sample. If sampled students are classified as students with disabilities (SD) or English learners (EL), and school officials, using NAEP guidelines, determine that they can meaningfully participate in the NAEP assessment with accommodation, those students are included in the NAEP assessment with accommodation along with other sampled students including SD/EL students who do not need accommodations. The R3 sample is more inclusive than the R2 sample and excludes a smaller proportion of sampled students. The R3 sample is the only reporting sample used in NAEP after 2001. 
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2004, 2008, and 2012 Long-Term Trend Assessments.






Last updated 05 October 2023 (SK)