State | State name | Number of schools in the NAEP full population sample | Number of schools used in mapping |
Estimated proportion of students meeting the state proficiency standard |
Estimated NAEP score equivalent to the state proficiency standard |
Estimated standard error of the NAEP score equivalent |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AK | Alaska | 158 | 97 | 0.79 | 179 | 2.0 |
AR | Arkansas | 151 | 144 | 0.53 | 214 | 1.3 |
CA | California | 445 | 421 | 0.47 | 209 | 1.0 |
CO | Colorado | 147 | 135 | 0.86 | 182 | 1.9 |
CT | Connecticut | 132 | 132 | 0.66 | 211 | 1.3 |
FL | Florida | 169 | 159 | 0.70 | 199 | 1.2 |
GA | Georgia | 176 | 156 | 0.86 | 169 | 2.6 |
HI | Hawaii | 132 | 131 | 0.56 | 204 | 1.3 |
IA | Iowa | 130 | 125 | 0.77 | 192 | 1.3 |
ID | Idaho | 157 | 148 | 0.87 | 181 | 2.2 |
IN | Indiana | 138 | 138 | 0.72 | 197 | 1.2 |
KY | Kentucky | 149 | 148 | 0.67 | 202 | 1.7 |
LA | Louisiana | 136 | 134 | 0.64 | 192 | 1.4 |
MA | Massachusetts | 202 | 199 | 0.48 | 232 | 0.9 |
MD | Maryland | 125 | 123 | 0.82 | 182 | 1.9 |
MS | Mississippi | 127 | 116 | 0.88 | 157 | 1.9 |
MT | Montana | 244 | 194 | 0.81 | 193 | 1.7 |
NC | North Carolina | 175 | 168 | 0.82 | 180 | 1.8 |
ND | North Dakota | 263 | 194 | 0.76 | 200 | 2.2 |
NJ | New Jersey | 135 | 134 | 0.81 | 187 | 2.5 |
NM | New Mexico | 161 | 135 | 0.50 | 204 | 1.6 |
NV | Nevada | 120 | 113 | 0.47 | 210 | 1.4 |
NY | New York | 190 | 186 | 0.70 | 205 | 1.5 |
OH | Ohio | 201 | 198 | 0.76 | 194 | 1.5 |
OK | Oklahoma | 176 | 175 | 0.82 | 177 | 1.5 |
SC | South Carolina | 119 | 118 | 0.34 | 226 | 1.8 |
TN | Tennessee | 139 | 137 | 0.88 | 161 | 3.1 |
TX | Texas | 383 | 376 | 0.80 | 183 | 1.3 |
WA | Washington | 136 | 133 | 0.80 | 194 | 1.4 |
WI | Wisconsin | 169 | 169 | 0.82 | 185 | 2.0 |
WV | West Virginia | 195 | 190 | 0.80 | 182 | 1.4 |
WY | Wyoming | 170 | 146 | 0.47 | 227 | 0.7 |
NOTE: NAEP reading cut scores at grade 4 are 208 for Basic and 238 for Proficient. The following states' grade 4 reading test data were not used in the analysis or received special treatment: ME and MI—results deleted due to discrepancies between state assessment data and the state document; CA and LA—reading data not available for the state assessment, so English Language Arts (ELA) data used; MA—reading data not available for state assessment, so "Language" data variable used; AZ, DC, DE, IL, KS, MN, MO, OR, PA, and VA—neither reading nor ELA data available in the state data file; AL, NH, RI, SD, UT, and VT—state assessment data not available. NE—state results were based on assessments developed by each local education agency. For more information about missing states and exclusion rates in each state, see A Profile of State Assessment Standards. | ||||||
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Reading Assessment and National Longitudinal School-Level State Assessment Score Database (NLSLSASD). |
See more data tables on the potential effects of exclusion on mapping state proficiency standards onto NAEP scales.
Read more about comparing NAEP and state proficiency standards.
Read more about full population estimates.