Skip navigation

Click for menu... About NAEP... Click for menu... Subject Areas... Help Site Map Contact Us Glossary NewsFlash
Sample Questions Analyze Data State Profiles Publications Search the Site
Reading
The Nation's Report Card (home page)

Cross-district comparisons of percentage of students at or above Proficient in reading, grade 8 public schools: By urban district, 2003

horizontal line
 Grade 8 Instructions: Read across the row corresponding to a district listed to the left of the chart. Match the shading intensity to the key to determine whether the percentage of students at or above Proficient in this district was found to be higher than, not statistically significantly different from, or lower than the district in the column heading. For example, in the row for Boston at grade 8: The percentage of students at or above Proficient in Boston was lower than that of the nation and Charlotte; not significantly different from New York City and San Diego; and was higher than that of large central cities, Chicago, Houston, Atlanta, Los Angeles, the District of Columbia, and Cleveland.
 
  Nation Large Central City Charlotte Boston New York City San Diego Chicago Houston Atlanta Los Angeles District of Columbia Cleveland
Charlotte No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
Boston District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
New York City District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
San Diego District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
Chicago District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
Houston District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
Atlanta District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column
Los Angeles District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column
District of Columbia District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column
Cleveland District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column
District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column. District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column.
No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column. No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column.
District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column. District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.





Major Findings additional information

  • At grade 8, the percentage of students performing at or above Proficient in all districts except Charlotte was lower than that of the nation.
  • When compared with large central city public schools, higher percentages of students performed at or above Proficient in Charlotte and Boston, and lower percentages of students performed at or above Proficient in Chicago, Houston, Atlanta, Los Angeles, the District of Columbia, and Cleveland.
  • The percentage of eighth-grade students performing at or above Proficient in New York City and San Diego was not found to be statistically different from the percentage in large central cities.

View the percentage of students with disabilities and limited-English-proficient students identified, excluded, and assessed with accommodations, grades 4 and 8.

Return to district-level results main page.

Return to main results.


Last updated 16 December 2003 (SW)