Skip navigation

Click for menu... About NAEP... Click for menu... Subject Areas... Help Site Map Contact Us Glossary NewsFlash
Sample Questions Analyze Data State Profiles Publications Search the Site
Reading
The Nation's Report Card (home page)

Cross-district comparisons of percentage of students at or above Proficient in reading, grade 4 public schools: By urban district, 2003

horizontal line
 Grade 4 Instructions: Read across the row corresponding to a district listed to the left of the chart. Match the shading intensity to the key to determine whether the percentage of students at or above Proficient in this district was found to be higher than, not statistically significantly different from, or lower than the district in the column heading. For example, in the row for San Diego at grade 4: The percentage of students at or above Proficient in San Diego was lower than that of the nation and Charlotte; not significantly different from large central cities, New York City, and Houston; and was higher than that of Boston, Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, the District of Columbia, and Cleveland.
 
  Nation Large Central City Charlotte San Diego New York City Houston Boston Atlanta Chicago Los Angeles District of Columbia Cleveland
Charlotte No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
San Diego District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
New York City District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
Houston District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
Boston District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
Atlanta District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column
Chicago District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column
Los Angeles District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column
District of Columbia District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column
Cleveland District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column
District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column. District had higher percentage than the district listed at the top of the column.
No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column. No statistically significant difference detected from the district listed at the top of the column.
District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column. District had lower percentage than the district listed at the top of the column.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.





Major Findings additional information

  • At grade 4, the percentage of public-school students at or above Proficient in all the districts except Charlotte was lower than that of the nation.
  • When compared with large central city public schools, a higher percentage of fourth-grade students in Charlotte performed at or above Proficient, while lower percentages of students in Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, the District of Columbia, and Cleveland performed at or above Proficient.
  • The percentage of students performing at or above Proficient in San Diego, New York City, Houston, and Atlanta was not found to differ significantly from the percentage at or above Proficient in large central cities.

View cross-district comparisons of percentage of students at or above Proficient in reading, grade 8.

Return to district-level results main page.

Return to main results.


Last updated 16 December 2003 (SW)