# The estimate rounds to zero. ‡ Reporting standards not met. Sample size is insufficient to permit a reliable estimate. Special analyses raised concerns about the accuracy and precision of national grade 4 Asian/Pacific Islander results in 2000. As a result, they are omitted.
* Significantly different from 2003. 1 "Other" comprises students whose race, based on school records, was "other race" or, if school data was missing, who self-reported their race as "multiracial" but not "Hispanic," or did not self-report racial/ethnic information. Approximately 1 percent of students were classified as American Indian/Alaska Native or Other races.
NOTE: Detail may not sum to totals because of rounding.
In addition to allowing for accommodations, the accommodations-permitted results (19962003) differ slightly from previous years' results and from previously reported results for 1996 and 2000, due to changes in sample weighting procedures.
Significance tests were performed using unrounded numbers. NAEP sample sizes have increased in 2003 compared to previous years, resulting in smaller detectable differences than in previous assessments.
SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, 2000, and 2003 Mathematics Assessments.
Major Findings
At grade 4, the percentages of White students, Black students, and Hispanic students at or above the Basic and Proficient achievement levels were higher in 2003 than in any of the previous assessment years.
The percentages of Asian/Pacific Islander students at or above Basic and Proficient were higher in 2003 than in 1990.
The percentage of White students at Advanced was higher in 2003 than in any of the previous assessment years.
See the national mathematics achievement-level results by race/ethnicity for grade 8.